Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2011, 02:12 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,583,593 times
Reputation: 4283

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Perhaps someone could enlighten me, as it is confusing. Nearly every week, there is an article in our local newspaper concerning the arrest of someone who has in thier possession downloaded child porn from the internet.

I am a little ignorant, but how in the hell is this stuff available "to download" in the first place! I am a little surprised that these sources, where ever they may be, are not shut down and banned in the first place. Is this not illegal to create and dispense? If made outside of the US, how can this still not be blocked?

Excuse the ignorance, but how the hell does this type of trafficking ever happen in the first place!?
Because Law Enforcement "can't stop crime" , they control
crime by placing criminal in jail ....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2011, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Metro DC area
4,520 posts, read 4,209,259 times
Reputation: 1289
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
How nice of you.. but hey, what if someone else feels the same way about "gays"? And no, I'm not saying gays are anyway involved in pedophilia, pornography etc, I'm saying you dont like people who look at porn and think they should be immediately killed.. Others dont like gays and think they should be immediately killed. Where do you set the limit and decide those who deserve death? Do we take a poll daily?
I said those who exploit/rape/abuse children....Your post suggests that I mean that porn watchers (in general) should be immediately killed. That's not what I said...but if it's people watching child porn, then my answer is yes. Not even touching the gay comment..as you said it's irrelevant and a silly assumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 12:28 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,583,593 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Perhaps someone could enlighten me, as it is confusing. Nearly every week, there is an article in our local newspaper concerning the arrest of someone who has in thier possession downloaded child porn from the internet.

The internet carries both "child and SM Porn" which is not
suitable for even the scum of the earth...........

I am a little ignorant, but how in the hell is this stuff available "to download" in the first place! I am a little surprised that these sources, where ever they may be, are not shut down and banned in the first place. Is this not illegal to create and dispense? If made outside of the US, how can this still not be blocked?

Child Porn is stoppable , but it's a '''low priority"''USA Intelligencies
Agencies could do the trick...NSA....CIA...Good Luck in getting that
DONE......my friend......
Excuse the ignorance, but how the hell does this type of trafficking ever happen in the first place!?
Porn is for people who can't or don't know how to ''make love''
the only time that "I was into ADULT PORN was 2006-07 when
I was having serious problems in my marriage.I noticed that
porn was totally different from the 1978 brand that I sampled
for a couple of weeks while I was in the Military..it was the
Violent Humiliating To WOMEN porn and COVERT CHILD PORN
'''such as EXPLOITED BLACK TEENAGER'' where they use (18)
(years old) women who LOOK 8 to 12 YEARS OLD...and are
LEGAL in as much as they meet the AGE LIMIT FOR PORN
STARS , but when you look at it...it's definitily CHILD PORN.
I Live In CALIFORNIA and wrote both my SENATORS.....
''''both WOMEN''''My CONGRESSMAN...THE GOVERNOR....
didn't ever hear from my FEMALE SENATORS...MY CONGRESS
-MAN '''brushed me off"''CALIFORNIA TERMINATOR GOVERNOR
said for me to CONTACT MY '''STATE REP"" and COMPLAIN....
and nothing ever HAPPENED to the PORN SITES.....It's A Very
Low PRIORITY and people think that It's An American Freedom
The other site that I complained about was GHETTO G____ER
which had what appeared to be KKK Skinhead Nazi TERRORIST
RAPING AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN......And passing it off as
INTERACIAL PORN.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,304,138 times
Reputation: 6658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howest2008 View Post
Porn is for people who can't or don't know how to ''make love''
Wrong

I sometimes watch porn when I have sex with my girlfriend
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 12:56 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,214,810 times
Reputation: 35013
Quote:
Originally Posted by filihok View Post
Wrong

I sometimes watch porn when I have sex with my girlfriend
Extra stimulation is often needed to perform. That's porn's real legacy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 01:02 PM
 
Location: An absurd world.
5,160 posts, read 9,172,561 times
Reputation: 2024
I do believe that child porn (when it really does occur) is a problem, but in many cases, efforts to crack down on it get out of hand. The FBI wrongfully has closed down thousands of sites before because they believed they were involved in child porn. It reminds me of the George Carlin bit about people placing a lot of emphasis on children to get legislations and regulations passed. Or as he put it:
"They want to censor you, and take your drugs away, all in the name of protecting kids."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 01:05 PM
 
1,337 posts, read 1,522,763 times
Reputation: 656
Quoting a rather odd ramble: " .... '''such as EXPLOITED BLACK TEENAGER'' where they use (18) (years old) women who LOOK 8 to 12 YEARS OLD...and are LEGAL in as much as they meet the AGE LIMIT FOR PORN STARS , but when you look at it...it's definitily CHILD PORN....."

It's child porn, why, exactly?

(a) because you don't think the current age limit is appropriate, or

(b) because you view the superficialities of that adults appearance as being something nefarious and criminal, just because heaven forbid a person looks younger than they are (something many people usually find to be a beneficial quality, only hoping that they could be so lucky to age that gracefully),

(c) or is it because you think it's designed to be targeted towards people who like younger looking persons.... which then still begs the question how you remotely think it is child porn, since the person is an adult, regardless of their superficial appearance?

-------------
Yeah, I'm sure that black teenage you speak of was "exploited." They definitely were either holding a gun to her head, or picked her up out of a homeless camp and 'forced' her to take pictures because she had "no other options in life," or otherwise "tricked" her and took advantage of her naivety, because as we all know, eighteen year old adults can't make informed decisions and consent. In fact, I think all sex for those under 21 must be made illegal. Better make it 25 or 30, just to be safe. You have convinced me, thank you for making us see the light.

Last edited by FreedomThroughAnarchism; 03-10-2011 at 01:37 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 01:23 PM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,372,847 times
Reputation: 1450
Child porn isn't natural, it's one of the most disgusting (the most disgusting) side of Humanity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 01:43 PM
 
1,337 posts, read 1,522,763 times
Reputation: 656
.[deleted]

Last edited by FreedomThroughAnarchism; 03-10-2011 at 02:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 02:01 PM
 
81 posts, read 197,343 times
Reputation: 90
These people deserve to die. They are the lowest of the low. If I ever saw anyone harm a child I would beat them to a pulp. I was in the mall last year and some ghetto fat pig and her boyfriend were treating their child like crap. The guy smacked the child full force blow to the back of his head! I immediately ran up to that guy,grabbed him by the neck and choked him violently. Thankfully there were witnesses who saw what happened, so we called the cops who then called child protective services. My wife consoled the child who was only 5 and said that "His mama and boyfriend hit him all the time"! If I was allowed to I would have adopted that boy right there to save him from a life of misery!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top