Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-27-2011, 11:38 PM
 
2,385 posts, read 4,332,495 times
Reputation: 2405

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Not true.
Forgotten April 1992 in Los Angeles already? How do you think the riots spread? (All public transportation was shut down during the riots).

Actual gangbangers and career criminals generally DO have access to cars. The homeless who commit crimes often don't, but I don't think you're talking about the homeless.

And if they don't - they can steal them....
We're not talking about a riot. We're talking about common, everyday, run-of-the-mill violence, vandalism and shoplifting. If you think that doesn't go on in the hood, well, I guess you've never really been to the hood then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-28-2011, 06:43 AM
 
2 posts, read 1,247 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
THEN DON'T BUY PROCESSED FOOD. Holy crap! That's what I do!!!! What a concept, don't buy food you don't want to eat. If you love freedom then let food providers make what there is a market for. If you're going to tell me what to eat and what food producers can produce, then you're going to have to let me control women's bodies. Is that fair? Or can you be consistent in your pro-choice views and let that apply to all facets of life?
Processed food is subsidized. It's definitely an area where the market should determine what is produced but that's not possible as long as Big Ag gets subsidized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 07:02 AM
 
2 posts, read 1,247 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by NomadScribe View Post
Look, I am not a transportation planner, nor do I expect every transport project o be funded immediately OR paid off by tax payers within 10 years.

About your questions, have public transport projects paid for themselves yet? I don't know. I have honestly not looked it up.

But have you looked up how the public transport system of Amsterdam or Stockholm or Berlin or any other European hub is faring? Are all of them in dismal failure? Have any of them seen success? Even in just getting local citizens to use their cars less?

I think this is a missing piece for many debators against public transport- they are so hel* bent on figuring out how public transport did not work out that they completely miss out how it did. I am not a statistician. Please do not demand that info of me. If you are interested, figure it out yourself smarty. In the meantime, what is your point and angle? Even if you are pumping for car use, there is a lot of interesting angles to get involved with the public transport model that will not leave you so alienated

Actually, there is an excellent example in the case of Curitiba, Brazil (if memory serves correct) where they adopted a Rapid Bus Transit model that effectively allowed public transportation users to reach there destinations faster than individual cars. This was made possible by rigging the traffic lights to always give the green light to oncoming buses. Ridership grew and the numbers of people driving their cars dropped. I don't have specifics in way of percentages, nor do I know how the program was financed. However, it is possible to have mass transit that deters people from driving their own vehicles. If a city in Brazil can do this, why can't we?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 07:18 AM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,417,923 times
Reputation: 24964
L.A. Mass Transit Chief Makes Airtight Case Against Rail - Hit & Run : Reason Magazine
Quote:
MTA claims it can no longer afford to support lines with mediocre ridership:
Metro Chief Executive Art Leahy said there were “astonishingly low†ridership levels on buses headed into downtown each morning and that the system operated at 42% capacity.
Leahy here reveals the inherent advantage of bus lines over rail lines – you can easily add to and subtract from bus service as the city changes and the needs of your customers evolve. (MTA says it will “enhance†service on some heavier-demand lines.)
If bus routes aren't sustainable, why would rail be?
In general and taken as an aggregate of commuters,not enough people ride buses or take trains to justify the expenditure of public funds on them.
Public transportation is nothing more than a giant wealth redistribution scheme.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 07:26 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,308,171 times
Reputation: 7364
Big oil companies have traditionally funded Republicans thus they are always against anything that saves our country oil and makes us less oil dependent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlassoff View Post
Judging by the number of posts on here from the right wing disparaging public transportation, I must wonder (applying the same logic that the right wing frequently applies to Sarah Palin and the religious right): Why is the right wing afraid of public transportation?

I don't think many people disparage public transportation. But many people disagree with public funding for programs that provide very little benefit. Most of us believe public transportation should fund itself.

What we are "afraid" of is the government taking more and more of our hard earned dollars for frivolous programs.

And you don't need to disparage Sarah Palin to make your point .... well, unless you are afraid of her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 07:32 AM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,417,923 times
Reputation: 24964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Big oil companies have traditionally funded Republicans thus they are always against anything that saves our country oil and makes us less oil dependent.
Can we then make the argument that powerful unions and Dems represent the self interest of the autoworker and will thus stand in the way of any attempt to get people out of their cars and onto mass transit?

Conspiracy theories aside, people prefer the freedom of the automobile.
And "freedom" seems to be a bad word in some camps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,847,737 times
Reputation: 4585
Public transportation? The RW is afraid of anything "Public".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 07:49 AM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,417,923 times
Reputation: 24964
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Public transportation? The RW is afraid of anything "Public".
Get it right.Anything the state runs is ultimately a fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 08:13 AM
 
Location: bold new city of the south
5,821 posts, read 5,301,736 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
You ever try bringing a load of 2X4's home on the bus?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
My fear is that public transportation will not be able to operate revenue-neutral based on the prices users are willing to pay. Taxes will have to be increased on everyone, to support the portion of the population that chooses to use public transportation.
We have had a monorail here for 20+ years. I think 12 people have ridden it so far. Maybe if I ever went where this 'Pubic Transportation' went, I might support it. But, it never has (or will), and neither will I.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top