Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2011, 09:15 PM
 
Location: Durham, NC
2,619 posts, read 3,150,063 times
Reputation: 3615

Advertisements

Actually, I am wondering why Michael Savage would even want to go to Britain any more. If they have gotten so lame brained that they consider him a threat while allowing radical Muslim cockroaches to spew their garbage, maybe Britain has become a lost cause.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2011, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,607,009 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
Interesting details on various countries:
Freedom of speech by country - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
When you study the details you will notice that most countries have similar exceptions from freedom of speech, for the US for instance it says:

"There are several exceptions to this including obscenity, defamation, incitement to riot, and fighting words, as well as harassment, privileged communications, trade secrets, classified material, copyright, patents, military conduct, commercial speech such as advertising, and time, place and manner restrictions."
Not to mention 'free speech zones'...


And there is an interesting map on the freedom of press 2009, where the US is not at the highest level, unlike e.g. Japan, Canada, Germany and most Scandinavian countries.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...nkings_Map.svg
Re: "free speech zones", the SCOTUS said they were constitutional in Madsen v. Women's Health Center. It's interesting that the 6-3 vote in that case was not what you'd expect. The 3 dissenting justices, who argued that "free speech zones" were unconstitutional and violated the First Amendment, were Kennedy, Scalia, and Thomas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 06:50 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,749,338 times
Reputation: 9728
Basically, there is free speech around the world. As long as you can speak or write you can say what you want anywhere. Only the sanctions vary from country to country. While in some regions such as the US, Europe or Australia there are no official sanctions for hardly anything you say, there are unofficial sanctions on the part of the people, the media etc. For instance political correctness.
In the US for instance you can say you find religion x stupid, but if you do you can forget about being elected into a political office. Or try saying you are an atheist or gay while running for president
Society always finds ways to condition the individual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Word Traveler via Haslet TX.
504 posts, read 457,087 times
Reputation: 262
Default And dont forget Snoop

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConservativeAmericanGuy View Post
Those limey bastards tried to keep out Jerry Lee Lewis as well...

Yeah lol and they kept Snoop Doggy Dog out as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 08:02 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,749,338 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLA-P View Post
Yeah lol and they kept Snoop Doggy Dog out as well.
And rightly so, Snoop Dogg and his idiots behaved like Neanderthals in Britain, read up here:
Snoop Dogg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(The big paragraph in the middle of the legal issues section)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 08:16 AM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,924,929 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
And rightly so, Snoop Dogg and his idiots behaved like Neanderthals in Britain, read up here:
Snoop Dogg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(The big paragraph in the middle of the legal issues section)
The US routinely denies entry to individuals who have been convicted of crimes. Canada does the same. Even DUI is enough to get refused entry there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Neither here nor there
14,810 posts, read 16,209,541 times
Reputation: 33001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
Basically, there is free speech around the world. As long as you can speak or write you can say what you want anywhere. Only the sanctions vary from country to country. While in some regions such as the US, Europe or Australia there are no official sanctions for hardly anything you say, there are unofficial sanctions on the part of the people, the media etc. For instance political correctness.
In the US for instance you can say you find religion x stupid, but if you do you can forget about being elected into a political office. Or try saying you are an atheist or gay while running for president
Society always finds ways to condition the individual.
It's "free speech with consequences". Like if want to, you could publicly burn a Koran in Afghanistan but your head would be quickly separated from your body.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 12:09 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,707,101 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Park View Post
It's their country and they can ban whomever (or is it whoever?) they want.

I believe nobody has an absolute right to visit any foreign country they please ... for all I know Bolivia might want to ban Kirdik for the way he dresses or Sri Lanka might want to ban Bulldogdad for his folksy attitude or Moldova might want to ban me because I like Bruce Springsteen.

Folksy in a gun lovin, freedom lovin, God fearin, taco eatin, Los Lobos lisnin, 4x4 drivin, sort a way. LOL

Cant stand his politics but thank goodness for the BOSS.


Hey little girl is ur daddy....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 01:12 PM
 
5,915 posts, read 4,813,813 times
Reputation: 1398
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmellc View Post
Actually, I am wondering why Michael Savage would even want to go to Britain any more.
He probably doesn't want to visit Britain. For him it's just a matter of principle to have his name removed from that list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2011, 02:18 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,995,315 times
Reputation: 7060
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
Apparently Brits are afraid of freedom of speech.

Britain reaffirms its ban on Michael Savage
Great Britain is so backwards. They ban right-wing pundits as "hate speech" but they're perfectly happy to allow Islamist extremists spewing their jihad hate speech every day on the street corners of Londonstan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top