Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Humanity will be the death of this planet not because of man made C02 it will be man made stupidity on not understanding the true nature of the earth and our planet.
Nature can not be tamed controlled and or understood without destruction results and unforseen consquences.
Nah the planet will survive but it may be uninhabitable for humans when all is said and done.
What like redirecting the flow of the Mississippi River destroying the Delta and the only natural barrier to storm surges?
Pretty much. You won't find me agreeing that the ACOE has sucessfully tamed any of the rivers. The harm done by erosion and periodically devistaing floods may well be worse than allowing these rivers to spread, flood and change course naturally.
Since the beginning of time man has done one thing that differentiates himself from nearly every other species on the planet, that is to control his environment. Governments go overboard on this, IMO. YMMV.
What we do know for certain is that the solar activity is in a heightened period and that anyone arguing Man made global warming quickly dismisses this cycle as well as that of the migration of the earth's magnetic poles. Why? The political agenda which drives the theory of man made global warming (pc: climate change) of course.
Why interfer with nature at all when this is a result of sunspots? You understand we are again forming glaciers in the upper Rocky Mountians through a cycle of heavy snows where the snowpack is not melting and is being added to every year, right?
While the southwest and Florida BURN. It is called climate change buckaroo .
Casper
While the southwest and Florida BURN. It is called climate change buckaroo .
Casper
Its called not letting the forestry service do its job and clear dead trees over the years in controlled burns. Now we got matchsticks lighting up more matchsticks. All to save the forests.
Its called not letting the forestry service do its job and clear dead trees over the years in controlled burns. Now we got matchsticks lighting up more matchsticks. All to save the forests.
Apparently you havn't watched these fires rage the past ten years. You suggest the cause is "climate change" and tell me to try again? LOL. Get your ark built early.
Trying to lower carbon emissions isn't trying to destroy the planet.
It makes decent sense to try and do it, in a responsible way that doesn't hurt anyones economy, and lessons our impact globally.
And they are talking about new technologies, not even caps.
Exactly, but as soon as climate change or global warming enters the headlines, ther OP could not resist the negative spin on it.
Hey OP...
UN scientists meet to decide best way to destroy the planet as opposed to oil cartel lobbyists meet with and grease the palms of corrupt politicians to decide the best ways to save the planet...right?
While the southwest and Florida BURN. It is called climate change buckaroo .
Casper
If your referencing forest fires one of the reasons they are so devastating over the last few decades is because we have prevented fires over the last 100 years. There is a vast accumulation of fuel on the ground and this causes very hot and long fires that sterilize the forest floor. Forests fires are natural event and in the past before mans intervention they happened frequently. These fires would move quickly through a forest burning yp the little bit of fuel that accumulated since the last fire, actually quite beneficial and really essential to the health of a forest.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.