Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And Popular Mechanics didn't have anything to gain. Um, yeah..
True scientists who have nothing to gain have conducted empirical studies that have concluded that the logistics of the whole event is a fraud. That people like you continue to believe in lies, when the evidence demonstrably reveals you to be in error, is absurd.
Go to my first post in this thread. This is the same non sense trotted out by conspiracy theorists. The fact that you are a birther speaks volumes.
I just saw a picture of either WTC 3 or WTC 6, completely blackened by fire, one side of it smashed, no windows anywhere, and standing tall.
Americans are taught not to question, and events like these remind me why
Exactly what would've been the point of bringing down WTC 7 from the point of a conspiracy guy like yourself? What exactly was the gain? Further, how can someone ask what is rational when all the of rational evidence has been discounted because you can't accept reality? It's incredibly ironic.
Exactly what would've been the point of bringing down WTC 7 from the point of a conspiracy guy like yourself? What exactly was the gain? Further, how can someone ask what is rational when all the of rational evidence has been discounted because you can't accept reality? It's incredibly ironic.
Spoliation of evidence involving Government crimes world-wide.
1) the Twin towers were hit by 2 767s, which were the largest planes at the time
2) both Towers lost 20-23% of the structure on the impact floors.
3) only slight weekening can have a catistrophic effects when the load is 125% the normal load on the structural members.
so no other outside influences were needed to bring the towers down.
1) the Twin towers were hit by 2 767s, which were the largest planes at the time
2) both Towers lost 20-23% of the structure on the impact floors.
3) only slight weekening can have a catistrophic effects when the load is 125% the normal load on the structural members.
so no other outside influences were needed to bring the towers down.
That's a nice neat package you have there, son.
Do you mind if anyone looks inside for any reason, logic or common sense?
It will for unquestioning minds like yours. And that explanation might have merit, but it does not end the argument. The motive is still there, plenty of other buildings (around the world) have suffered far worse and not collapsed, and the ability of neoconservatives to get their operatives in place over a 12 hour window and plant thermite is also possible.
For all I know, PM is published by Newscorp.
Are all buildings built the same? Do all buildings burn for 7 hours uncontrolled? It's pretty obvious to a truly rational person that some people just can't handle the reality of that horrible day, and it's easier to believe in some mass conspiracy than to believe that people just do sh*t things to each other for political and religious gain.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
