Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,112 posts, read 30,622,386 times
Reputation: 16395

Advertisements

I think it could depend on multiple factors. If a business is leasing a building, could the lessor ban smoking in that building for the tennants? What about neighboring businesses? Cigarette smoke can cause extensive damage to walls that could effect neighboring businesses. If I own a hat shop and a bar goes in next door and makes my store ( and consequently, my merchandise) smell like smoke should I have recourse if sales go down? I've seen nicotine from regular indoor smoking cause waxy substances in windows and walls that's very difficult to remove. If we share an a/c or air vent, am I going to be responsible to damages from my neighbor?

Should the bar be required to install some sort of high powers independent air circulation system? Whose expense should it be?

Personally, I dont care either way, but if I'm smoking, thatfreedom ends when it starts affecting other people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:07 PM
 
Location: SW Missouri
15,852 posts, read 35,126,723 times
Reputation: 22695
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Interesting court case I found

High Court will Review Smoking Ban Constitutionality

COLUMBUS – The Supreme Court of Ohio today agreed to become the first state supreme court in the nation to determine whether a statewide smoking ban violates bar owners’ property rights. The Court also agreed to review whether the Ohio Department of Health has consistently exceeded its authority in fining business owners under the ban.

Lawsuit documents here

http://www.ohioconstitution.org/wp-c...risdiction.pdf
Nobody is forced to go to a bar. Unlike a hospital or school or other facility were people do not have the choice bars are purely optional. There are plenty of non-smoking establishments to accommodate those folks who do not smoke, therefore, it should be up to the owner of the establishment to determine whether or not the bar should cater to a smoking or non-smoking crowd.

20yrsinBranson
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,733,986 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetJockey View Post

Personally, I dont care either way, but if I'm smoking, thatfreedom ends when it starts affecting other people.

There are plenty of laws on the books that protect businesses from outside harm. We don't need a ban on smoking to double up on that protection.

You could say the same about sewage. Why should a hat shop lose customers because a shop next door let's their sewage leak and stink..... but we don't need another law banning sewage stink.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,522,627 times
Reputation: 8075
If smoking was as harmful as they make it out to be then the FDA would be allowed to regulate it or the Feds would make it illegal. But the Feds and states make too much tax revenue off cigarettes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Flippin AR
5,513 posts, read 5,239,642 times
Reputation: 6243
I believe smokers should have the right to smoke (although I never would), so long as they are not affecting anyone else. What they do NOT have the right to do is pollute the air others have to breathe with massive toxins and carcinogens. That is tantamount to assault, and over the long term (like if you live with a smoker who smokes in the home), assault with a deadly weapon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:10 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,948,311 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Interesting court case I found

High Court will Review Smoking Ban Constitutionality

COLUMBUS – The Supreme Court of Ohio today agreed to become the first state supreme court in the nation to determine whether a statewide smoking ban violates bar owners’ property rights. The Court also agreed to review whether the Ohio Department of Health has consistently exceeded its authority in fining business owners under the ban.

Lawsuit documents here

http://www.ohioconstitution.org/wp-c...risdiction.pdf
Absolutely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,522,627 times
Reputation: 8075
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Nobody is forced to go to a bar. Unlike a hospital or school or other facility were people do not have the choice bars are purely optional. There are plenty of non-smoking establishments to accommodate those folks who do not smoke, therefore, it should be up to the owner of the establishment to determine whether or not the bar should cater to a smoking or non-smoking crowd.

20yrsinBranson
A well designed ventilation system would eliminate most of the smoke in bars but some would still complain about the smell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:16 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,948,311 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Nobody is forced to go to a bar. Unlike a hospital or school or other facility were people do not have the choice bars are purely optional. There are plenty of non-smoking establishments to accommodate those folks who do not smoke, therefore, it should be up to the owner of the establishment to determine whether or not the bar should cater to a smoking or non-smoking crowd.

20yrsinBranson
While I agree with the result of your position, I have one objection.

" There are plenty of non-smoking establishments to accommodate those folks who do not smoke"

I don't agree with that premise. It isn't the fact that there may be such establishments available that are non-smoking, rather that there is the freedom of any individual to cater to that need if it is in demand.

That is, even if there was not a single non-smoking establishment available currently, the owner should be the one to determine what is allowed and those who desire a non-smoking establishment can become a business owner and stipulate that as a requirement for their business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,021,348 times
Reputation: 6192
Either outlaw cigarettes altogether or allow it. This death by a million small bans thing is nothing more than an infringment on property rights. Why do we continue to allow cigarette smoking? Revenue. Oh and look how Prohibition worked out for organized crime; it was a windfall.

Freedom is not easy and that includes property rights. You want your local haunt to not allow smoking, then you should lobby the owner and exercise your preference through your wallet and encourage others to do the same. Having government ban something that you dislike is asking government to overstep their bounds. Enough.

If you genuinely think cigarettes are pure harm and serve no purpose, then lobby to have cigarettes outlawed completely but as I said before, that's pretty darn unlikely. Government is not there to support your personal cause; stop trying to use it to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2011, 02:36 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,463,557 times
Reputation: 15184
Government can permit or forbid businesses from having alcohol consumption on its grounds. Why is smoking any different?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top