Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The bottom line is there is not a 100% consensus on man causing global warming and until there is it should not be brought up as fact in grade schools to impressionable children...
There's hardly 100% consensus on anything in science. Should we abstain from teaching basic cosmology because somebody thinks Venus entered the Solar system 3500 years ago and wrote a book on it? Of course not.
If the GW crowd can't win people with BS they'll do it to our children....
This planet's temps are only a half step to the right of the little ice-age, and these alarmists act as if we are about to fall of the climatic cliff, and burn in the fires of hell.
Maurice Strong said:
“In order to save the planet, the group [GIM] decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about? This group of world leaders [GIM] forms a secret society to bring about an economic collapse.”
Maurice Strong has demonstrated an uncanny ability to manipulate people, institutions, governments, and events to achieve the outcome he desires.
Through his published writings and public presentations he has declared his desire to empower the U.N. as the global authority to manage a new era of global governance.
He has positioned his NGO triumvirite, the IUCN, WWF, and the WRI, to varnish U.N. activity with the perception of "civil society" respectability. And now he has been appointed Senior Advisor to the U.N. Secretary General and assigned the responsibility of reforming the United Nations bureaucracy.
There's hardly 100% consensus on anything in science. Should we abstain from teaching basic cosmology because somebody thinks Venus entered the Solar system 3500 years ago and wrote a book on it? Of course not.
The bottom line is there is not a 100% consensus on man causing global warming and until there is it should not be brought up as fact in grade schools to impressionable children...
The Joint Chiefs believe that climate change is real and a national security threat. The fact that it is regarded as such makes teaching our children about climate change in school perfectly valid IMHO just as teaching about Cold War threats was valid when I was a kid.
It is only indoctrination if you don't want your (grand)children to be educated and prepared.
The bottom line is there is not a 100% consensus on man causing global warming and until there is it should not be brought up as fact in grade schools to impressionable children...
Since you seem so fixated on this person open your own thread and discuss him there, don't hijack this one
He has everything to do with this thread about global warming and how the DOE is brainwashing our kids with it, to push an agenda. Follow the friggin money!
I understand they are also indoctrinating them into the Satanic disciplines of evolutionary biology and basic physics.
Another superior intelligence post to the topic at hand...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
