Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2012, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,285,332 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nightflight View Post
Lol @ "contempt of Congress". Isn't that like pinching a prostitute on the butt?
Nothing short of impeachment will do anything to get Holder to come along and I doubt the Senate would go along with that. However, the House can bring it off, if they can get past the Speaker, Boehner and his RINO actions. In watching Boehner try to stop Issa from this investigation I have determined that Boehner is nothing less than one of the worst RINOs in Congress.

Issa can continue to keep this thing in front of the public and it may cost some votes for Obama in the end. It is so obvious what is going on that maybe some left leaning people can come to see what is going on.

Has anyone noticed on this thread that in January Issa threatened contempt charges and nothing has happened yet other than more threats. I wonder how much Boehner has to do with this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2012, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,285,332 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
That would seem to be a serious separation of powers issue, but hey that hasn't stopped the "Constitutionalists" before.
I see that you must think that separation of powers is more important than Checks and Balances. Can you explain how that is? Oh yeah, left leaners don't care about Checks and Balances when their people are involved. Actually what you suggest is much more anti-constitutional than what the real truth is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,663,697 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrench409 View Post
The issue isn't vile extremists from either side. We know that is gonna happen no matter what.

The issue is selective censorship.

As for spewing vile venom, use the little 'report post' icon on the site. It works.
Sometimes. Occasionally.

Some of the worst offenders whom I've reported continue unabated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,350,388 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucario View Post
Issa is nothing more than a grandstanding fool.
Nothing but a racist witch hunt indeed! Nothing to see here move along folks.....ROFLMMFAO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,350,388 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucario View Post
Sometimes. Occasionally.

Some of the worst offenders whom I've reported continue unabated.
I believe if you read the TOS it clearly states that disagreeing with you is not a violation and not worthy of reporting the post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 12:06 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,397,060 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I see that you must think that separation of powers is more important than Checks and Balances. Can you explain how that is? Oh yeah, left leaners don't care about Checks and Balances when their people are involved. Actually what you suggest is much more anti-constitutional than what the real truth is.
Separation of powers is basically another way of saying checks and balances. If you allow congress to run wild over the executive and judicial branches there are no checks and balances. The need for some executive privilege has been recognized by the Supreme Court for quite some time.

Basically this goes back to 1796 when George Washington refused to provide the house with treaty documents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,663,697 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
I believe if you read the TOS it clearly states that disagreeing with you is not a violation and not worthy of reporting the post.
Spewing racist hatred is substantially different from disagreeing with me.

However, I do understand that some of these "people" may be spewing views that you agree with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,285,332 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
Separation of powers is basically another way of saying checks and balances. If you allow congress to run wild over the executive and judicial branches there are no checks and balances. The need for some executive privilege has been recognized by the Supreme Court for quite some time.

Basically this goes back to 1796 when George Washington refused to provide the house with treaty documents.
Was your example anything like what Holder is doing now? I know about both cases enough to know that the answer is no. I think that Executive Privilege extends to the Executive but not to all his employees. He is elected and Holder was appointed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,285,332 times
Reputation: 4269
Calling all libs. One of your favorite deflectors has announced to me that he is through writing here, just reading occasionally. I think he ran away because he knew I had "taken" him. I will surely miss old Casper but this isn't the first time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2012, 12:28 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,397,060 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Was your example anything like what Holder is doing now? I know about both cases enough to know that the answer is no. I think that Executive Privilege extends to the Executive but not to all his employees. He is elected and Holder was appointed.
It absolutely extends to employees. During the Eisenhower administration when the anti-communist hearings were occurring, Eisenhower forbid DOD officials from testifying, or giving statements to Congress under the belief that a communist witch-hunt could undermine the military.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top