Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2012, 08:35 AM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,003,195 times
Reputation: 5224

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
This is a wonderful day for this state. I am so glad and appreciative that Governor Gregoire made this possible in the final months of her administration.

Of course, I expect the people with the petitions to start showing up at the entrance to Safeway but this will be one petition I won't be signing.

It was the right thing and I hope more states soon follow.
I read that the State only requires about 120,000 signatures to put a proposition on the Nov ballot. That seems like an awfully low threshold. I hope that wash. doesn't have the huge numbers of bible thumpers and turd world immigrants that calif has. Otherwise, you're in for yet another battle. But, congratulations on the accomplishment from your legislature and wise Governor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2012, 08:49 AM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,256,164 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehotex View Post
I read that the State only requires about 120,000 signatures to put a proposition on the Nov ballot. That seems like an awfully low threshold. I hope that wash. doesn't have the huge numbers of bible thumpers and turd world immigrants that calif has. Otherwise, you're in for yet another battle. But, congratulations on the accomplishment from your legislature and wise Governor.
I'm not going to lie to you - I am a little concerned about how this plays out. Right now, I am trying to just be happy that we have come this far.

I really can't predict what the voters will do if they get enough signatures for a referendum, and I'm sure there will be an onslaught of misleading ads by the idiots who insist that same sex couples can't use the term "marriage," but I certainly hope the voters of the state will do the right thing, if it comes to that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 09:06 AM
 
Location: The middle of nowhere Arkansas
3,325 posts, read 3,170,849 times
Reputation: 1015
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
It's not quite approved yet. The House has to pass the bill and then the governor has to sign it into law.
That isn't what the op indicated. I'm getting mixed messages from liberals........again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 09:17 AM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,631,332 times
Reputation: 3028
Th federal government should never be allowed to say who can enter into what types of relationships. Hopefully states will continue to get on board allowing people to marry based on their own views, not the views of others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 09:17 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,776,567 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
They don't abide by the Constitution. Back to the question at hand:

Since when do liberals abide by the Constitution?
We don't, since when? At least liberals understand the Constitution. Since Social Conservatives are anti-education, they typically don't study law as so evident by their inability to know how it works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,168,625 times
Reputation: 2283
I have no problem with this, the question I have, why is it "Crossing the party lines when a republican votes opposite, but not when a democrat does it?

Quote:
The packed public galleries burst into applause as the Senate passed the measure on a 28-21 vote after nearly an hour and a half of debate. Four Republicans crossed party lines and voted with majority Democrats for the measure. Three Democrats voted against it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Lakeside
5,266 posts, read 8,746,219 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
We don't, since when? At least liberals understand the Constitution. Since Social Conservatives are anti-education, they typically don't study law as so evident by their inability to know how it works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 09:27 AM
 
Location: The middle of nowhere Arkansas
3,325 posts, read 3,170,849 times
Reputation: 1015
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXboomerang View Post
Th federal government should never be allowed to say who can enter into what types of relationships. Hopefully states will continue to get on board allowing people to marry based on their own views, not the views of others.
I actually agree with this statement. We need fewer issues decided at the federal level and more decided at the state and local level. That was the intention of the founders after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 09:32 AM
 
Location: The middle of nowhere Arkansas
3,325 posts, read 3,170,849 times
Reputation: 1015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
We don't, since when? At least liberals understand the Constitution. Since Social Conservatives are anti-education, they typically don't study law as so evident by their inability to know how it works.

Please substantiate this claim. Just who "studies law" other than lawyers. Are all lawyers liberal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2012, 09:44 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,508,677 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutchman01 View Post
That isn't what the op indicated. I'm getting mixed messages from liberals........again.
The thread title is wrong now, but will be right soon enough. The House, 56-42 Dem majority, is expected to pass the bill next week and the guv said she'd sign it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top