Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You think women don't feel the same pain when having a heart attack? Are you serious?
Supposedly, for unknown reasons, women's symptoms aren't the "classic" chest pain radiating/SOB/sweating, and ERs tend to see these in middle-aged men, and think heart attack, whereas women symptoms might not include that "crushing" pain, but are nausea, dizziness, other discomforts. The women themselves might not think heart attack, and women might be having smaller heart attacks all along and not know. That's not the same as "don't feel the same pain."
Could not resist posting this. You cannot beat Progressives/Liberals for their sense of humor.
A friend of mine, while in the military was having her 3rd child and wanted her tubes tied at the same time (she needed a C-section). On a military salary, they couldn't even afford the kids they already had. But when the time came, she was sent to a Catholic Hospital, and they refused to do the sterilization.
So my friend, who WASN'T Catholic, was forced to undergo future abdominal surgery when she got pregnant again (they had failures of every single means of birth control).
So is "forcing" Catholic hospitals to provide contraception and sterilization a violation of THEIR rights? No--they are forcing THEIR outdated views on many who do not share them.
Also, all Catholic hospitals get PLENTY of taxpayer money. So if they want to forfeit ALL tax assistance--and immediately transfer anyone like my friend who wants/needs such services--they can be free to do what they like.
A friend of mine, while in the military was having her 3rd child and wanted her tubes tied at the same time (she needed a C-section). On a military salary, they couldn't even afford the kids they already had. But when the time came, she was sent to a Catholic Hospital, and they refused to do the sterilization.
So my friend, who WASN'T Catholic, was forced to undergo future abdominal surgery when she got pregnant again (they had failures of every single means of birth control).
So is "forcing" Catholic hospitals to provide contraception and sterilization a violation of THEIR rights? No--they are forcing THEIR outdated views on many who do not share them.
Also, all Catholic hospitals get PLENTY of taxpayer money. So if they want to forfeit ALL tax assistance--and immediately transfer anyone like my friend who wants/needs such services--they can be free to do what they like.
And if a woman DARES to speak up about the problem, the oh-so-christian Repugs lie about her, slander her with vile names.....and laugh about it...
They use the old tactic of trying to shame women into silence.....EXACTLY like stoning them into submission.....
The national discussion is to get it off of the Obama failures.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?!
And if a woman DARES to speak up about the problem, the oh-so-Christian Repugs lie about her, slander her with vile names.....and laugh about it...
Any brain-fart that comes out of a person's mouth looking for new forms of welfare does not have to be treated like they are worthy of anything.
She is the one telling us she has this big problem and that we should be paying in some way for her recreational sex.
I think if she can't afford a 99 cent box of condoms or the $9 prescription for pills, then she should just instead masturbate all day and night and leave the tax payer's money alone.
Same for killing your baby with abortion or the infanticide that Obama was for.
Having sex or a baby isn't a real medical condition, it started out with choices that we all know ends in expected results.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?!
They use the old tactic of trying to shame women into silence.....EXACTLY like stoning them into submission.....
part of their War on Women......
Has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with there being no money and having pathetic people looking for more hand outs.
She shamed herself IMO, nobody had to shame her.
She was not stoned at all, she was subjected to another opinion that was not the same as hers.
Go sit under a shovel of rock and let it drop on your head and let us all know if there is a difference between a different opinion and getting a pile of rocks on your head.
It isn't a war on women, it is liberal women in this case manipulated by Obama to put more people on the welfare roles as dependents so they are beholden to the Democrat party for votes.
Call a spade a spade. It is what it is and we don't need more entitlements.
This whole discussion was about changing the national discussion away from Obama's bad economy, Obamacare, his Arab Spring and all his failures.
Any brain-fart that comes out of a person's mouth looking for new forms of welfare does not have to be treated like they are worthy of anything.
She is the one telling us she has this big problem and that we should be paying in some way for her recreational sex.
I think if she can't afford a 99 cent box of condoms or the $9 prescription for pills, then she should just instead masturbate all day and night and leave the tax payer's money alone.
Same for killing your baby with abortion or the infanticide that Obama was for.
Having sex or a baby isn't a real medical condition, it started out with choices that we all know ends in expected results.
Has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with there being no money and having pathetic people looking for more hand outs.
She shamed herself IMO, nobody had to shame her.
She was not stoned at all, she was subjected to another opinion that was not the same as hers.
Go sit under a shovel of rock and let it drop on your head and let us all know if there is a difference between a different opinion and getting a pile of rocks on your head.
It isn't a war on women, it is liberal women in this case manipulated by Obama to put more people on the welfare roles as dependents so they are beholden to the Democrat party for votes.
Call a spade a spade. It is what it is and we don't need more entitlements.
This whole discussion was about changing the national discussion away from Obama's bad economy, Obamacare, his Arab Spring and all his failures.
Having a baby isnt a medical condition?
Where did you say you got your medical degree?
I must have missed that.
Any brain-fart that comes out of a person's mouth looking for new forms of welfare does not have to be treated like they are worthy of anything.
She is the one telling us she has this big problem and that we should be paying in some way for her recreational sex.
I think if she can't afford a 99 cent box of condoms or the $9 prescription for pills, then she should just instead masturbate all day and night and leave the tax payer's money alone.
Same for killing your baby with abortion or the infanticide that Obama was for.
Having sex or a baby isn't a real medical condition, it started out with choices that we all know ends in expected results.
Has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with there being no money and having pathetic people looking for more hand outs.
She shamed herself IMO, nobody had to shame her.
She was not stoned at all, she was subjected to another opinion that was not the same as hers."""
NO, she was NOT subjected to an opinion, she was verbally stoned, slandered, villified and, ,LIED about...
Go sit under a shovel of rock and let it drop on your head and let us all know if there is a difference between a different opinion and getting a pile of rocks on your head.
It isn't a war on women, it is liberal women in this case manipulated by Obama to put more people on the welfare roles as dependents so they are beholden to the Democrat party for votes.
Call a spade a spade. It is what it is and we don't need more entitlements.
This whole discussion was about changing the national discussion away from Obama's bad economy, Obamacare, his Arab Spring and all his failures.
Scrape, scapre....the sounds of knuckles dragging.
The woman who testified wanted her health care insurance company THAT SHE PAYS THE PREMIUMS FOR WITH HER OWN MONEY to continue to FAIRLY give her for what SHE PAID FOR.
She did NOT ask anyone else to pay ....she did not ask anyone else to pay....read that real slowly if it helps....YOU can NOT prove she did, because she didn't.....lying is a sin.
The woman is not on Welfare ...did you know lying is a sin?
She did NOT ask for a hand out and YOU can NOT prove in any way she did.....lying is a sin.
But you keep up the good work of supporting RELIGIOUS BUSINESSES breaking the law....that's what they're best at anyway...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The national discussion is to get it off of the Obama failures.
