Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-02-2012, 06:47 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,689,147 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammbriggs View Post
i didn't know that. i thought that everything should be attempted before firing directly at someone. nevertheless, mandatory sentencing is idiotic. the judge in both linked cases hand their hands tied by the legislation. it is a great tragedy that in my extimation, most of the people in prison today, shouldn't be there!
Carrying a gun comes a responsibility of knowing the law. You need to know what is legal and what is not legal. Florida has mandatory sentencing for gun violations. For example, just pointing a gun at someone during a crime brings a mandatory 5 years in prison even if the gun is not loaded.

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 05-02-2012 at 06:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-02-2012, 06:49 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,472,372 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
A blank in the chamber?
Sorry.....epic fail


Your warning shot is your voice warning/command of "Stop...I have a firearm and I will shoot."
Why warn them at all?

I always carry when I am in the bush. If a bear is running away from me, I am not going to shoot, any more than I would shoot some punk running away from me. The sole purpose of carrying a firearm, when I am not hunting, is to protect myself against physical harm. If at any time I feel that my life is in danger, I am going to shoot whatever I perceive to be the threat, and I am going to continue shooting until I feel that my life is no longer in danger. No warnings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 06:50 AM
 
913 posts, read 873,355 times
Reputation: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Carrying a gun comes a responsibility of knowing the law. You need to know what is legal and what is not legal. Florida has mandatory sentencing for gun violations. For example, just pointing a gun at someone brings a mandatory 5 years in prison even if the gun is not loaded.

fair enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,686,325 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post

I use the term it because an assailant is a pest to be killed and not a human being to be cherished
Extremely well said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 06:53 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,689,147 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammbriggs View Post
fair enough.
As for warning shots:

It is unlawful to knowingly discharge a firearm in any public place, or on the right of way of any paved public road, highway or street or over any road, highway, street or occupied building, except in defense of life or property, in performance of official duties or where expressly approved for hunting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 06:55 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,212,498 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452 View Post
I would say if one is adamant about firing a warning shot, keep a blank in the first chamber, but never fire a warning shot with a loaded cartridge.

sorry, I dont shoot blanks, I just shoot 300 grain corbon bullets out of my 454 Casull, or 240 grain fmj out of my Glock 21.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 07:01 AM
 
5,524 posts, read 9,944,611 times
Reputation: 1867
While I think the sentence is way too much I understand the reasoning. If she felt safe enough to fire a warning shot then she should not have fired at all. That's the thought behind this.

If she pulls the gun and aims and then he comes towards her and she kills him then okay. But to be able to think about and pull off a warning shot probably means the threat wasn't enough to justify the shooting but the penalty is way too harsh IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 07:04 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,212,498 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by tluv00 View Post
While I think the sentence is way too much I understand the reasoning. If she felt safe enough to fire a warning shot then she should not have fired at all. That's the thought behind this.

If she pulls the gun and aims and then he comes towards her and she kills him then okay. But to be able to think about and pull off a warning shot probably means the threat wasn't enough to justify the shooting but the penalty is way too harsh IMO.

the only warning shot she should have given the perp was when the bullet was entering their chest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 07:16 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,354,392 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Why warn them at all?

I always carry when I am in the bush. If a bear is running away from me, I am not going to shoot, any more than I would shoot some punk running away from me. The sole purpose of carrying a firearm, when I am not hunting, is to protect myself against physical harm. If at any time I feel that my life is in danger, I am going to shoot whatever I perceive to be the threat, and I am going to continue shooting until I feel that my life is no longer in danger. No warnings.
You use verbal commands and warnings to cover yourself in a potential criminal or civil trial. Potential witnesses hearing your warnings are a huge plus in your defense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2012, 07:18 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,212,498 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
You use verbal commands and warnings to cover yourself in a potential criminal or civil trial. Potential witnesses hearing your warnings are a huge plus in your defense.

very true, but in my own home, verbal warnings is not an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top