Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Good. Don't belabor it. Because you're wrong. Marriage is a right. The United States Supreme Court has long ruled it is a right, and has affirmed this over and over.
Marriage is between one man and one woman, regardless of race, religion and ethnicity.
Changing the definition of marriage is NOT a "right".
If you're both men, you CANNOT procreate with each other.
Anyway, to protect the fabric of society.
One man and one woman.
Once the definition of marriage is changed, everything changes.
Our society was much stronger when we had strong nuclear families.
When was marriage about making children? It never was and never will be. Until it is legally required by law (which it won't) then your argument is flimsy and weak at best.
Marriage is between one man and one woman, regardless of race, religion and ethnicity.
Changing the definition of marriage is NOT a "right".
Neither is denying the same rights and privileges to a group of people just because they're different than you. That's against the law and goes against the 14th amendment.
Changing the definition of marriage is a legal matter and is a privilege provided to us under the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Show where it says homosexuals are allowed to be discriminated against because of their lifestyle?
No it hasn't. Maybe in America, sure but in other countries? Not so much. Do your research before you make an even bigger ass out of yourself. Thanks.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.