Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:05 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,411,358 times
Reputation: 1173

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Considering that Florida removed thousands of voters from their rolls in 2000 who should not have been removed, someone needs to keep an eye on the state. It's the federal government's job to make sure that individual states are not discriminating against their own citizens.
It is the federal government's job as it was designated in the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Section V of that Act sets out which states MUST get a preclearance from the Feds before any change in voting laws can go into effect. Clearly, Florida under the direction of Gov. Scott, did not follow the law with respect to the five counties in this state. So how can a state voting law be applied to all counties except for the five which have been restricted in Section V of the Voting Rights Act of 1965?

Obviously, the federal govt is doing their job by sending Florida a warning to stop proceeding with this new law. If Scott defies this warning, seems like he'll be going to fed court pretty quickly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:07 PM
 
2,729 posts, read 5,373,305 times
Reputation: 1785
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Considering that Florida removed thousands of voters from their rolls in 2000 who should not have been removed, someone needs to keep an eye on the state. It's the federal government's job to make sure that individual states are not discriminating against their own citizens.
Proof please.

In addition, it GOES WITHOUT SAYING that all such processes need to be monitored closely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:07 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,411,358 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Eric Holder wants Florida to stop purging NON-CITIZENS from the rolls.

Tell me why?
Eric Holder wants Florida to comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Section V.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
Eric Holder wants Florida to comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Section V.
And WHERE does it say a state can't purge the rolls of NON-CITIZENS? You ok with them voting?

Can the democrats be any more transparent in their goal to enable voter fraud?

The state of Florida says they will continue and answer the DOJ next week. Let's take it to court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:14 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,681,792 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big George View Post
Proof please.
"...a Palm Beach Post computer analysis has found at least 1,100 eligible voters wrongly purged from the rolls before last year's election - the collateral damage from an aggressive and ill-conceived state plan to prevent felons from voting."

Local News: West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Martin & St. Lucie Counties | The Palm Beach Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:15 PM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,427,122 times
Reputation: 6462
Any Black person that escapes from the Democrat plantation is a threat to Dems. Just like runaway slaves were a threat to the institution of slavery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:21 PM
 
2,729 posts, read 5,373,305 times
Reputation: 1785
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
"...a Palm Beach Post computer analysis has found at least 1,100 eligible voters wrongly purged from the rolls before last year's election - the collateral damage from an aggressive and ill-conceived state plan to prevent felons from voting."

Local News: West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Martin & St. Lucie Counties | The Palm Beach Post
Excellent. Thank you!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:22 PM
 
20,346 posts, read 19,937,992 times
Reputation: 13465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big George View Post
How about this one: BECAUSE DEAD PEOPLE, AND NON-CITIZENS, SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE.?
Do you have any idea how detrimental that would in places like Cook County, IL or Hudson and Essex Counties, NJ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:30 PM
 
2,729 posts, read 5,373,305 times
Reputation: 1785
Quote:
Originally Posted by doc1 View Post
Do you have any idea how detrimental that would in places like Cook County, IL or Hudson and Essex Counties, NJ?
No doubt! Or King County, Washington, where President Obama received more votes than there were registered voters. Hmmm...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 09:32 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,411,358 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
And WHERE does it say a state can't purge the rolls of NON-CITIZENS? You ok with them voting?

Can the democrats be any more transparent in their goal to enable voter fraud?

The state of Florida says they will continue and answer the DOJ next week. Let's take it to court.
This is about a new STATE LAW. That's the issue. the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Section V, lists the states and counties (five counties in Florida) in the U.S. which cannot apply new state voting laws at all, for any reason, without preclearance which is required by the Voting Rights Act.

The Republican legislature passed and the Republican Governor signed this law, and certainly the Governor's Office should have known about the restrictions which have applied to Florida since 1965; obviously he ignored the law.

So, yes, let's see what happens in court. I didn't write the VRA of 1965.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top