Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-14-2012, 01:25 AM
 
Location: The Other California
4,254 posts, read 5,610,240 times
Reputation: 1552

Advertisements

I recently stumbled across this civic literacy test. The questions seem very reasonable.

I propose that a minimum score of 70 percent be required in order to vote in the United States.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-14-2012, 01:29 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,391 posts, read 4,485,249 times
Reputation: 7857
Tests for voting were declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court decades ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2012, 01:34 AM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,262,505 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogersParkGuy View Post
Tests for voting were declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court decades ago.
Little things like that don't matter to the OP. He has a pretty specific agenda.

You're new here; you'll learn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2012, 01:36 AM
 
Location: The Other California
4,254 posts, read 5,610,240 times
Reputation: 1552
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogersParkGuy View Post
Tests for voting were declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court decades ago.
They're not unconstitutional by a long shot, despite the imaginings of the courts.

If they were, the constitution could and should be amended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2012, 01:38 AM
 
Location: The Other California
4,254 posts, read 5,610,240 times
Reputation: 1552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
He has a pretty specific agenda.
Yes - a return to sanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2012, 01:45 AM
 
Location: E ND & NW MN
4,818 posts, read 11,009,478 times
Reputation: 3633
I somehow managed to get 75 pct. But boy that is a tough test.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
 
Location: The Other California
4,254 posts, read 5,610,240 times
Reputation: 1552
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaninEGF View Post
I somehow managed to get 75 pct. But boy that is a tough test.
Congratulations. You scored higher than the average Harvard graduate.

It's tough, but if it were required, imagine all the studying up Americans would be doing to get qualified! It's a win-win if you ask me.

Last edited by WesternPilgrim; 10-14-2012 at 02:21 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2012, 02:17 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,028,641 times
Reputation: 6128
I scored 86.89% - I am qualified to vote according to OP's standard.

The 8 questions that I missed dealt most with philosophical and economic issues.

I need to read more Adam Smith, Plato, and Aquinas.

Found a cheap copy of Wealth of Nations the other day - think I will drop by and pick it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2012, 02:19 AM
 
Location: E ND & NW MN
4,818 posts, read 11,009,478 times
Reputation: 3633
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesternPilgrim View Post
Congratulations. You scored higher than the average Harvard graduate.

It's tough, but if it were required, imagine all the studying up Americans would be doing to get qualified! It's a win-win if you ask me.
Thanks....it said I got 45 out of 60. Most I recall from high school/college history classes (in my mid 40s now so must have a good memory I suppose).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2012, 02:19 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,391 posts, read 4,485,249 times
Reputation: 7857
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesternPilgrim View Post
They're not unconstitutional by a long shot, despite the imaginings of the courts.

If they were, the constitution could and should be amended.
What are you talking about? All such tests were abolished by the Civil Rights Act of 1965. The SC struck down all state voting tests as a result. Don't take my word for it--look it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top