Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:18 AM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,331,859 times
Reputation: 8066

Advertisements

http://www.lohud.com/interactive/art...nclick_check=1

No matter where you fall on the spectrum of gun ownership, this strikes me as the height of journalistic malpractice. Why should some sleazebag buy a gun when he can just break into someone's house? What are they going to report when those guns are stolen and then used in a crime? You know they won't blame themselves. What if the gun owner now has to use that gun because some jacka$$ is breaking into his or her house because the newspaper put the address out there.

This kind of thinking and reporting is inexcusable and will only create more problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:21 AM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,222,200 times
Reputation: 35014
I have to wonder what the point of this all is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:22 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,707,101 times
Reputation: 23295
Yup what it is also showing you is addresses where potentially no gun exists. Good starting point for criminals planning home invasions, rapes, robberies, murders etc......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:27 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,707,101 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
I have to wonder what the point of this all is.
Some dumbassed *******s notion of safety the people. If they all know who is carrying a gun then you cant stay away from the evil gun owner.

Its a form of public outing to try and assign condemnation and embarassment towards the gun owner. also potentially get them fired or other negative social ostracization of being a legal law abiding 2nd ammedment gun owner.

Pull My Finger, this is excellent example of one of the points I was making last night. Don't you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:29 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
I have to wonder what the point of this all is.
Sell news papers and the hope in some demented editors mind that it will get them a journalism award.

Pretty fracking wrong headed editorial decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:31 AM
 
45,227 posts, read 26,450,499 times
Reputation: 24985
the other side of the coin is that any would be robber may decide to rob the households where no permit is shown, thus minimizing the threat of lead poisoning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:34 AM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,972,963 times
Reputation: 7315
No doubt they got info via FOI, and all media is infatuated with using that tool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:40 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,474,011 times
Reputation: 9440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
the other side of the coin is that any would be robber may decide to rob the households where no permit is shown, thus minimizing the threat of lead poisoning.
99% of the time the burglars go into homes where no one is home.A great way to get guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
99% of the time the burglars go into homes where no one is home.A great way to get guns.
Also a good point that your gun won't defend your house when you aren't home.

As for the article in the OP, I definitely think it is bad journalism and might possibly be something that could open them up to lawsuit in the near future. It definitely should not of been published.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Inland Empire, Calif
2,884 posts, read 5,642,077 times
Reputation: 2803
Hot Damn, it looks like both sides agree on this one...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top