Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Very simply...If TM was a girl getting her head slammed against the pav...and had a gun...could she get it out and save her life, maybe a very very few could have....but..the bottom line is men are supposed to look after the girls, case closed, dump the gov. They failed and cannot come up with progress. They are useless.
So someone attacks someone and it is the governments fault.
It's not biased. You know, there is such a thing as credible evidence. Credible evidence comes from well-designed research studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Peer review means the article is stringently reviewed by several scientists for validity, reliability, study design, conclusions before it is published. If it doesn't pass, it is never published.
If that were true we wouldn't have piles and piles of easily debunked anti-gun research studies used to promote an anti-self defense agenda by people like you who swallow them hook line and sinker.
If that were true we wouldn't have piles and piles of easily debunked anti-gun research studies used to promote an anti-self defense agenda by people like you who swallow them hook line and sinker.
Says you. I have not seen "piles of piles" of debunked studies.
everyones situation is different..I don't need one but if the neighborhood was whatever....even granny peeling the apples for pie would have a device if necessary...its all relative.
Says you. I have not seen "piles of piles" of debunked studies.
You've posted a few of them in this very thread. The anti-self defense klan will do or say anything to push their rabid agenda and you are no different.
You've posted a few of them in this very thread. The anti-self defense klan will do or say anything to push their rabid agenda and you are no different.
Show me where any of the studies I have posted have been debunked.
If you want to say that data from the FBI, and Bureau of Justice Statistics have been debunked, show me. Because that's the most reliable data out there, where law enforcement, legislators, and policy makers get their data.
All the more reason for women to take their own self defense seriously and arm themselves.
I guess Democrats want women to just wait around until a man can save them or something stupid like that.
That doesn't make sense. Have you not read the last several pages on this thread? The presence of a gun in the home is more likely to be a danger to a woman. Maybe in fantasy land she can dive for the gun and get to it before her angry husband, but in reality, that apparently doesn't happen.
Or go to this interactive graph of all the gun homicides since Newtown. Click on the little figures indicating female victims. See how many were killed by a boyfriend or husband. Even if it was a murder suicide which somehow doesn't "count" in your eyes, the woman still had her life taken, sometimes along with her children. On average nearly 3 women a day are killed by an intimate partner (1027 in total for the year 2011 - not always with a gun).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
