What's wrong with teaching evolution in public school? (homosexual, dollar, leader)

[DC at the Ridge]

Originally Posted by Harrier

"Jerk" - anyone who dares to challenge an evolutionist's dogmatic beliefs.

(from the Liberal Lexicon).

Because nothing about your above assertion could be deemed obnoxious or jerk-like.

There is no such thing as the Liberal Lexicon.

[sickofnyc]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Scientists are devoted to dogma?

Thank you.

The dogma would be in the pursuit of ever exploring, discovering, analyzing, experimenting and the attempt to reach scientific conclusions and answers...not the dogma of stagnation and ignorance. Don't you get that? I guess not. A dogmatic scientist would be an oxymoron.

[dv1033]

Originally Posted by Harrier

There is exactly zero evidence for macro-evolution.

See here's the problem..... There isn't just biological proof, but proof comes from many different disciplines.

For you to say there was no macro evolution implies that the Earth has never had any extinction events, the continents don't drift, the world isn't billions of years old, etc.....

Essentially your whole argument depends on a very young, never changing Earth.

[Old Gringo]

It insults the unintelligent. Their strident calls for political correctness to insert their favorite creation story become tiresome.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge

There is no such thing as the Liberal Lexicon.

From where did Bill Clinton get his "unique" definition of what the word "is" means?

[dv1033]

Originally Posted by Harrier

From where did Bill Clinton get his "unique" definition of what the word "is" means?

Not the liberal lexicon....

Let's stay on topic here.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by sickofnyc

The dogma would be in the pursuit of ever exploring, discovering, analyzing, experimenting and the attempt to reach scientific conclusions and answers...not the dogma of stagnation and ignorance. Don't you get that? I guess not. A dogmatic scientist would be an oxymoron.

You just contradicted yourself - twice.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by dv1033

Not the liberal lexicon....

Let's stay on topic here.

President Clinton's impeachment took place 7 years before City Data P&OC forum was instituted.

I think that is fair to refer to it, if we are discussing the basis of word definitions(among other things).

[dv1033]

Originally Posted by Harrier

President Clinton's impeachment took place 7 years before City Data P&OC forum was instituted.

I think that is fair to refer to it, if we are discussing the basis of word definitions(among other things).

Yes and what others and myself are trying to tell you and Guns is that you can't just make up words and facts and expect to pass them off as reliable or correct.

You've been exposed as ignorant to modern biology and you are just trying to save face.

[sickofnyc]

Originally Posted by Harrier

You just contradicted yourself - twice.

Are you purposely obtuse? Ii clearly explained where the dogma would lie when referring to a scientist and the field that they are expert in. Dogmatic used in that context is not the insane dogma of a Bible thumper who bases their dogma on unproven fables and ones that never even pan out. Yeah, keep waiting for that Rapture thingy.