Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The last two quote did NOT indicate that they were okay with someone killing a person because they were mad at them. Also don't see any laws saying it's okay to kill a person because you're angry at them or about anything.
That is what the death penalty is. I guess you are agreeing the others are saying that though.
In principle I'm in favor of the death penalty, but in practice I'm against it. It is too slow in being carried out and actually more expensive for the tax payers than life imprisonment. Let this scumbag rot in maximum security for the rest of his life.
I'm assuming this is why people end up with the personal attacks as it seems it is the only thing you understand.
That's a pretty nasty thing to say. Pathetic defense of people personally attacking rather than discussing the issue. Exactly how do personal attacks add anything to the conversation and how do they communicate anything about the topic? They don't. They are just intended to threaten and shut people up. That does not work with me, as you can see I'm still posting.
The thought, "Why not just kill this kid," is nothing but an emotional reaction to the kid, which is exactly what he wanted. Of course, his behavior is repulsive. I've never said it wasn't. I've been talking about how these things play out in real life.
That's a pretty nasty thing to say. Pathetic defense of people personally attacking rather than discussing the issue. Exactly how do personal attacks add anything to the conversation and how do they communicate anything about the topic? They don't. They are just intended to threaten and shut people up. That does not work with me, as you can see I'm still posting.
The thought, "Why not just kill this kid," is nothing but an emotional reaction to the kid, which is exactly what he wanted. Of course, his behavior is repulsive. I've never said it wasn't. I've been talking about how these things play out in real life.
Yes and that emotion is anger which is what I said but for some reason you felt a need to dispute my claim despite agreeing with it.
Yes and that emotion is anger which is what I said but for some reason you felt a need to dispute my claim despite agreeing with it.
You've lost me completely. What did you say about anger and how did I dispute what you said and agreed with it at the same time? Maybe you could just give me the post numbers?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
