Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So the contention that the 3 officials that testified yesterday was incorrect, now we have a 4th whistleblower, tell me why this was not brought up at the hearings yesterday.
What a debacle yesterday was for the Republicans. Unlike previous hearings, they didn't even have adversarial witnesses... they had friendly "whistle-blowers" that they've been coaching and debriefing for weeks. And they still couldn't get their little fantasy to come true.
You want to stick your head in the ground and ignore it that is your opinion and you are free to have it.
It would not matter who reported it you would reject it because you do not want to hear it.
Here is the thing its every citizens right to question our government ,
I do not think there is anything illegal in this situation , IMHO it just displays the incompetence of the president and for the sake of all ambassadors i would like to know why help was not sent, why they were told to stand down, who authorized it and why send rice out to be made a fool of ,did they try to embarrass rice? I would think those are important questions to ask for the next time an embassy asks for help
What will Liberals pick, incompetence or cover up or both?
Any General knows and so does any soldier that you do not go out into a public platform and bad mouth the POTUS. And i was never in the military. As Commander and Chief would you have put up for it?
Well, it's not even a military matter, really, it's just standard workplace knowledge. You don't go to the press and lob asinine insults at your boss, unless you want to be fired.
The video = lie, perpetuated by people at the highest levels in government You don't think it's important to get to the bottom of this? Yes, Clinton should definitely be brought back, and someone should tell her what difference it makes. Maybe she'll feel the heat and tell the truth this time around.
The fact that this has been the focus is very telling, Rice indicating it was a video less than a week after the attack is not the most important issue. The point is they were killed by terrorists, it appears they are more interested in discrediting Rice than finding solutions. How many questions did you hear regarding catching the people that murdered them, where were the questions regarding what country these terrorists came from, where did they get the weapons.
What is more important catching the terrorists or what Susan Rice stated on a talk show.
What will Liberals pick, incompetence or cover up or both?
"Cover up" is out, since, yet again, it doesn't appear that they covered much of anything up. And in this one, "incompetence" is out, since changing "consulate" to "diplomatic facility" is pretty minor.
ETA: and even that assumes the facility was in fact a consulate.
Why do the anti-Americans, the American Taliban, the RWNJ's hate America so much? That's a central question in these "hearings" which seek do dishonor the lives lost and our military and diplomatic corps.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
