Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-28-2013, 09:57 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038

Advertisements

What Do I Win!


Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
...wonders out loud to himself...
"How in the world is Zimmerman's lawyer going to introduce anything about Martin social media posts or anything about his past that would admissible as evidence? Mr. Zimmerman cannot claim prior knowledge of Mr. Martin's activities so how would they have informed his actions. I can understand the trace evidence of marijuana use but not much else..



As for Mr. Zimmerman's past actions, well that's a whole different story. While I doubt the prosecution will be able to get it all in, certain portions do speak a propensity for actions that are directly similar to the night in question. Although if Mr. Zimmerman takes the stand and he some how opens the door... all bets are off."

Circuit Judge Debra S. Nelson] ruled that the two sides cannot bring up evidence of Martin's familiarity with guns, previous marijuana use, and previous fighting incidents. She left the door open on one issue involving marijuana. Defense attorneys say toxicology tests show Martin had enough THC—the key active ingredient in marijuana—to indicate he may have smoked the drug a couple of hours before the shooting. Nelson barred any mention of this from opening statements, but said she will rule later on whether it will be admissible after she hears defense experts' testimony about the marijuana use. ... The attorneys also cannot bring up Martin's text messages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-28-2013, 09:59 AM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,256,164 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
What Do I Win!

Circuit Judge Debra S. Nelson] ruled that the two sides cannot bring up evidence of Martin's familiarity with guns, previous marijuana use, and previous fighting incidents. She left the door open on one issue involving marijuana. Defense attorneys say toxicology tests show Martin had enough THC—the key active ingredient in marijuana—to indicate he may have smoked the drug a couple of hours before the shooting. Nelson barred any mention of this from opening statements, but said she will rule later on whether it will be admissible after she hears defense experts' testimony about the marijuana use. ... The attorneys also cannot bring up Martin's text messages.
Good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2013, 11:35 AM
 
46,963 posts, read 25,998,208 times
Reputation: 29449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
Good.
Indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2013, 12:10 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,409,029 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
You have to be smoking something yourself to believe that any prior evidence of Martin engaging in fights will not be allowed by the judge or not utilized by the defense. The drug stuff may be disallowed, any prior history of fighting will certainly come out.

What you have is a case where a man shoots an individual with a prior history of violence when he is on his back being assaulted. This is a slam dunk case. Zimmerman will walk.

There should be a law against being as dumb as George.; there ain't.
I think the Judge ruled "against you" this morning in terms of bringing in information about fighting by Martin (prior history of fighting).

Seems like George's most serious problem is lack of impulse control, even though he also seems not that bright. It's possible that he's learning some things at this point, as he has not been making a lot of public statements as far as I know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2013, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
You have to be smoking something yourself to believe that any prior evidence of Martin engaging in fights will not be allowed by the judge or not utilized by the defense. The drug stuff may be disallowed, any prior history of fighting will certainly come out.

What you have is a case where a man shoots an individual with a prior history of violence when he is on his back being assaulted. This is a slam dunk case. Zimmerman will walk.

There should be a law against being as dumb as George.; there ain't.
What are YOU smoking?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
What Do I Win!




Circuit Judge Debra S. Nelson] ruled that the two sides cannot bring up evidence of Martin's familiarity with guns, previous marijuana use, and previous fighting incidents. She left the door open on one issue involving marijuana. Defense attorneys say toxicology tests show Martin had enough THC—the key active ingredient in marijuana—to indicate he may have smoked the drug a couple of hours before the shooting. Nelson barred any mention of this from opening statements, but said she will rule later on whether it will be admissible after she hears defense experts' testimony about the marijuana use. ... The attorneys also cannot bring up Martin's text messages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top