Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,746,808 times
Reputation: 1531

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Plenty of companies move but mostly because cost, CT will just have to live with the loss of 140 employees, not much of a loss. Probably a good move for the company going to an area where they can reduce wages and with a lower cost of living.
cost of living is lower and lower taxes, meaning if they keep the pay scale the same, the workers are still ahead, plus you are not in the Statist North East, which is always a plus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:10 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,903,846 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
It's all symbolic and doesn't amount to much, other companies will take the place of those refusing to sell to LE. The financial condition of gun companies is not an issue they have done well the last 4 years but I guess you can always improve the bottom line.

Read that Business link I posted in the last post.... there are a slew of companies moving and/or considering a move, or expanding elsewhere, BECAUSE of these new laws their current state has passed or is debating.

Berretta
Stag
Mossberg

read the link
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:13 PM
 
Location: 77441
3,160 posts, read 4,369,005 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Many companies..., who else besides the other gun manufacturer is considering relocating because they disagree with sensible gun laws. No reason they could have remained but that's their choice.

The article was short on specific reasons.
the major fail w/your post is the "sensible gun laws" that a simple liberal talking point meaning:
"we're going to take baby steps until we've totally disarmed the citizens and turned them into subjects."

the proof is in the pudding.
look @ Kali, the eastern states, NYC, chitcago,
the list of liberals stripping basic American rights away in the name of "sensible" and "its fo' de chilluns" is large.

a liberals version of "responsible gun laws" (I need to go spit, BRB) only affects law abiding citizens, not criminals.
thats the definition of shear stupidity and liberals touch themselves over the thought.



you wouldnt understand why the gun industries has to move,
they have principles, liberal parasites have no understanding of principle.

gun owners have no tolerance for traitors, thats why so few liberals are gun owners.
If a gun manuf. stayed in a state they couldnt sell their own product in,
responsible people in other states wouldnt support them, Magpul is a prime example.

Colt isnt leaving because they were bribed into staying.
they were making arrangements to move their main facility down to the 2nd plant in florida but they miraculously got a new govt contract and they decided to stay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:35 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,903,846 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bily Lovec View Post
the major fail w/your post is the "sensible gun laws" that a simple liberal talking point meaning:
"we're going to take baby steps until we've totally disarmed the citizens and turned them into subjects."

the proof is in the pudding.
look @ Kali, the eastern states, NYC, chitcago,
the list of liberals stripping basic American rights away in the name of "sensible" and "its fo' de chilluns" is large.

a liberals version of "responsible gun laws" (I need to go spit, BRB) only affects law abiding citizens, not criminals.
thats the definition of shear stupidity and liberals touch themselves over the thought.



you wouldnt understand why the gun industries has to move,
they have principles, liberal parasites have no understanding of principle.

gun owners have no tolerance for traitors, thats why so few liberals are gun owners.
If a gun manuf. stayed in a state they couldnt sell their own product in,
responsible people in other states wouldnt support them, Magpul is a prime example.

Colt isnt leaving because they were bribed into staying.
they were making arrangements to move their main facility down to the 2nd plant in florida but they miraculously got a new govt contract and they decided to stay.
Yeah, I see what you are saying, but do you think people are going to quit buying remignton after they contracted with NY law enforcement after saying they wouldn't sell to LE in that state? Do you really think Colt is going to lose much biz?

I don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:42 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
We need to get a few in State Ammo makers also.

We'll never need to leave home.


Right now, the federal government is making it impossible to start production(new company) for manufacture of loaded cartridges and shotgun shells. I have been trying for 3 years, to open a big scale operation with over 2 dozen investors chomping at the bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 08:15 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,080,948 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Last I looked, Sturm Ruger globally employs around 1,200, and their sales are huge.
Those aren't burger flipper jobs though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 08:20 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,221,262 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Right now, the federal government is making it impossible to start production(new company) for manufacture of loaded cartridges and shotgun shells. I have been trying for 3 years, to open a big scale operation with over 2 dozen investors chomping at the bit.
What roadblocks do they throw up ? I would think OK would welcome and assist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,532,311 times
Reputation: 25777
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
Read that Business link I posted in the last post.... there are a slew of companies moving and/or considering a move, or expanding elsewhere, BECAUSE of these new laws their current state has passed or is debating.

Berretta
Stag
Mossberg

read the link
They already lost Winchester to SC IIRC. That was a few years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:34 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,979,518 times
Reputation: 7315
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Those aren't burger flipper jobs though.
They aren't, but they are also typically paying median wages little more than 50% of Met Life, who Ct is also losing jobs at.

If I were Ct, I'd focus on insurance. This itty bitty 140 employee mom and pop manufacturer was just looking for attention. In the grand scheme of things, 2,200 jobs industrywide in a state with more than 1.5 million jobs is an insignificant industry.

Note: Verizon announec a plan to cut 160 call center positions , including 41 professional positions, in Meriden, Ct today. Did it w/o a press conference, too!! Shazam! This clownish gun mfg firm moving 140 to SC simply pulled off a great P/R stunt. Who would know of their jobs otherwise?

Last edited by bobtn; 06-19-2013 at 09:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 05:24 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,351,641 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Many companies..., who else besides the other gun manufacturer is considering relocating because they disagree with sensible gun laws. No reason they could have remained but that's their choice.

The article was short on specific reasons.
Tell us about the CT gun laws and exactly how they're sensible. Can you explain how they will reduce gun crime? That's rhetorical of course......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top