Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I never said anything about citizenship. I was speaking about attempts to quell early voting, reducing the number and hours of polls being open, and onerous identification requirements - all part of Republican voter suppression efforts.
So doesn't this effect all voters regardless of political party, or were Republicans exempt from this? So your implying the those other than Republicans voted early, couldn't vote on time and can not show identification?
I'm a non-partisan voter and I still do not see the logic in your "quoted statement".
So doesn't this effect all voters regardless of political party, or were Republicans exempt from this? So your implying the those other than Republicans voted early, couldn't vote on time and can not show identification?
In places like Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio and other states, these moves - which included restricting which forms of identification were acceptable - were designed by Republicans to disproportionately affect minority voters - the majority of whom vote Democratic.
Quote:
I'm a non-partisan voter and I still do not see the logic in your "quoted statement".
So doesn't this effect all voters regardless of political party, or were Republicans exempt from this? So your implying the those other than Republicans voted early, couldn't vote on time and can not show identification?
I'm a non-partisan voter and I still do not see the logic in your "quoted statement".
In places like Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio and other states, these moves - which included restricting which forms of identification were acceptable - were designed by Republicans to disproportionately affect minority voters - the majority of whom vote Democratic.
Requiring voters to present ID, racist, requiring gun buyers to present ID, not so..
Whats the difference since both are protected by the Constitution
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucario
See the links in my last post.
Identification to vote isnt voter suppression, unless you believe blacks are too stupid to obtain ID.
Requiring voters to present ID, racist, requiring gun buyers to present ID, not so..
Whats the difference since both are protected by the Constitution
Identification to vote isnt voter suppression, unless you believe blacks are too stupid to obtain ID.
Or too lazy to wait in line, or too dumb to vote ahead of time, or whatever it is they've decided is "suppression". Do liberals have any idea how insulting that is?
Yup, hanging chads are called proof of voter suppression. Seriously?
From that last link..the guy just might be dissing his party as an act of revenge.
This "upstanding" man is currently serving jail time for theft and money laundering of GOP funds.
I wouldn't put much credibility into what he "says" without any proof.
"Florida’s former Republican Party chairman Jim Greer, who, scorned by his party and in deep legal trouble..."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
