Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 07-17-2013, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,627 posts, read 16,635,080 times
Reputation: 6075

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSoul View Post
Although not all hetero couples have children, ALL children come from a man and woman union.
Thus, it is in society's interest to support marriage as defined by a man and a woman.
So now only a married man and women can produce a child?

 
Old 07-17-2013, 12:55 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,486,815 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSoul View Post
You think it's "empathetic" to support STDs, AIDS & mental illness???
That is what homosexual fetishes have statisticall proven to lead to.
Likewise, everyone who drinks Coke -- an unnatural product whose consumption is motivated by nothing but pleasure, and that contributes nothing of value to human health or society -- eventually gets fat and develops diabetes, so true empathy demands that we ban the drinking of Coke while also blaming and punishing those who get fat and develop diabetes.
 
Old 07-17-2013, 12:57 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,964,020 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSoul View Post
Your empathy is shallow and self-centered if you believe that it is in soceity's best interest to dish out special legal treatment just for having homosexual fetishes, while others are harassed for objecting to having their children endocrinated with homosexual lies in public schools.

You think it's "empathetic" to support STDs, AIDS & mental illness???
That is what homosexual fetishes have statisticall proven to lead to.
You got your empathy definition all mixed up.
If there were NO homosexuals, there would still be STD's, AIDS and mental illness. The number of heterosexual people with these conditions vastly outnumber the number of homosexuals with these conditions.
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:00 PM
 
2,468 posts, read 3,138,540 times
Reputation: 1351
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDragonslayer View Post
First of all, homosexuality is not a behaviour and we have been around as long as mankind and we are not the cancer of society, religion is.
First of all, homosexuality IS a behavior. What else is it????
Or are you like a typical bully who labels someone by their weakensses, caling people fetishes, instead of acknowleding their BEHAVIOR of practicing homosexual fetishes??? It's like a bully calling someone with epilepcy "Spaz."

Quote:
Religion is behind most if not all wars, religion was behind the crusades.
When were the curcades - like 400 years ago? What does the crucades have to do with anything NOW???

Quote:
Religion persecutes and denegrates.
Prove it. Show me all of the CURRENT (not 300 year old) studies that prove religion "denegrates."

Quote:
And morality is not based on ones sexual orientation.
Obviously, you don't know what the word "moral" means.
Moral: of, pertainting to, or concerned with right conduct or its principles

Is it "right" that a penis enters into an anus, an anus that is anatomically meant to be an exist only for excrement, spreading STDs & AIDS through such sexual fetishes?
Is it "right" that a woman would attempt to use a fetish, like *****, to pretend to be a man, spreading STDs through the sex toy?

Maybe that's right in your world, but according to basic human anatomy and what is healthy, it's far from it.
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:02 PM
 
2,468 posts, read 3,138,540 times
Reputation: 1351
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
So now only a married man and women can produce a child?
Do you really need me to fill you in on how this all works?

Ok...

Not all heterosexual couples have children, but every single human being on earth (including you, Dsjj) comes through heterosexual unions.

This is why heterosexual unions are supported by marriage - to support the future societies.

Homosexual fetishes prove to be a liability to society & thus should not be legally supported.
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:03 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,486,815 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSoul View Post
Homosexual fetishes prove to be a liability to society & thus should not be legally supported.
Love is not a fetish.
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:05 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,486,815 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSoul View Post
Maybe that's right in your world, but according to basic human anatomy and what is healthy, it's far from it.
So you agree that we should ban Coke, as I suggested above. Drinking Coke is unhealthy (basic human anatomy demands that we should drink only water), and causes obesity and diabetes.
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:05 PM
 
2,468 posts, read 3,138,540 times
Reputation: 1351
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
If there were NO homosexuals, there would still be STD's, AIDS and mental illness. The number of heterosexual people with these conditions vastly outnumber the number of homosexuals with these conditions.
Obviously because THERE ARE MORE PEOPLE WHO HAVEN'T FALLEN FOR HOMOSEXUAL FETISHES.
Those who practice homosexual fetishes make up such a tiny portion of the population, yet their statistics are so much greater in STDs, AIDS & mental illness than heterosexuals, according to the United States Center for Disease Control.
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:08 PM
 
2,468 posts, read 3,138,540 times
Reputation: 1351
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
So we should ban Coke, as I suggested above. Drinking Coke is unhealthy, and causes obesity and diabetes.
There are so many harmful activities - even baby oil, if injested is lethal.
Do you honestly think that we could ban all potentially harmful behavior?

Nobody is banning homosexual fetishes - go indulge in fetishes all you want - & you'll indulge in the consequences too, whether you want to or not.
Just don't demand special legal treatment just for having fetishes!
And don't shove this at my kids in public schools, behind my & other parents' backs, as some have done!
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:12 PM
 
642 posts, read 1,116,093 times
Reputation: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSoul View Post
Is it "right" that a penis enters into an anus, an anus that is anatomically meant to be an exist only for excrement, spreading STDs & AIDS through such sexual fetishes?
Is it "right" that a woman would attempt to use a fetish, like *****, to pretend to be a man, spreading STDs through the sex toy?

Maybe that's right in your world, but according to basic human anatomy and what is healthy, it's far from it.
So you're saying we should ban oral and anal sex? And forbid masturbation and use of sex toys?
How are we going to enforce these restrictions?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top