Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-13-2013, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,083,461 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
That's policy, not law.
SCOTUS and 23 subsequent courts appear to be of the conviction otherwise.

 
Old 08-13-2013, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,083,461 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Logic fail. If that were true, there would never be a need for a separate native born citizen distinction as native born citizenship status precludes one from Constitutional eligibility and would therefore never be restored as such unless one failed to meet the criteria required for natural born citizen status.
And as we have repeatedly pointed out, there is no need. For whatever reason USCIS chooses to make the distinction, it's certainly not becuase they need to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
ETA: Note also that USCIS was specifically referring to only native-born citizens to begin with. USCIS then further classified native born citizens as native born OR natural born.
This is another bald faced lie. the USCIS rules are explicit that they are speaking of any woman "who had acquired citizenship at birth within or without the United States," not just native born women.

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
One can be a native born citizen but not a natural born citizen.
No. You have that exactly backwards.
 
Old 08-13-2013, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,083,461 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Which SCOTUS case decided POTUS eligibility? Cite it.
US v. Wong Kim Ark.

The opposing attorney knew it. The dissenting justice knew it. 23 subsequent courts know it. I know it.

What's keeping you?
 
Old 08-13-2013, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,083,461 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by _CARL_ View Post
But the presidential clause doesn't ask for a native Citizen to be president. It asks for a natural born Citizen.
And since all native born citizens are also natural born citizens, Obama is eligible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by _CARL_
Obama's campaign website Fight The Smears during the 08 election stated he was native Citizen. Why they didn't put he was a natural born Citizen? I find that curious.
No reason. One made the point just as completely as the other.
 
Old 08-13-2013, 03:11 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,894,256 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by _CARL_ View Post
But the presidential clause doesn't ask for a native Citizen to be president. It asks for a natural born Citizen. Obama's campaign website Fight The Smears during the 08 election stated he was native Citizen. Why they didn't put he was a natural born Citizen? I find that curious.


Carl
Because native-born citizens are a subset of natural-born citizens?
 
Old 08-13-2013, 03:13 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Talk about logic fail.
On your part, yes.
Quote:
One can be a natural-born citizen but not a native-born citizen.
That's not what USCIS is talking about. Review this post, complete with citations and links, again, very carefully:
http://www.city-data.com/forum/30933144-post647.html

USCIS was specifically referring to only native-born citizens to begin with. USCIS then further classified native born citizens as native born OR natural born.

One can be a native born citizen but not a natural born citizen. Hence, the OR and WHICHEVER in USCIS's statement.

What part, specifically, are you unclear on? That USCIS was referring to a section of law that referenced only native born citizens? Or that USCIS then separates native born citizens into either of two classifications: native born OR natural born?
 
Old 08-13-2013, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts & Hilton Head, SC
10,029 posts, read 15,679,858 times
Reputation: 8679
Closed for mod review.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top