Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:02 AM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,456,732 times
Reputation: 14266

Advertisements

They like to call Obama the dictator, but think about it:

ACA was passed legally, per the Constitutional process, through the House, Senate, and White House. And it withstood Supreme Court review.

Boehner and his buddies have not mustered the electoral support to pass anything through the legislative process. They are a minority and are using threats against our livelihoods to try to dictate what they want.

And we know that most Americans strongly disapprove of what they are doing, even more than they disapprove of Obama and the Democrats, so they are clearly not interested in representing the "will of the people."

So who's the one trying to be the dictator: the one who went through the Constitutional process and achieve a valid result, or the one unilaterally demanding that the majority do certain things under the threat of national economic recession?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:15 AM
 
293 posts, read 250,165 times
Reputation: 181
I like to call Teapublicans 'economic terrorists' ... but fine work nonetheless...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:20 AM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,411,358 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
They like to call Obama the dictator, but think about it:

ACA was passed legally, per the Constitutional process, through the House, Senate, and White House. And it withstood Supreme Court review.

Boehner and his buddies have not mustered the electoral support to pass anything through the legislative process. They are a minority and are using threats against our livelihoods to try to dictate what they want.

And we know that most Americans strongly disapprove of what they are doing, even more than they disapprove of Obama and the Democrats, so they are clearly not interested in representing the "will of the people."

So who's the one trying to be the dictator: the one who went through the Constitutional process and achieve a valid result, or the one unilaterally demanding that the majority do certain things under the threat of national economic recession?
Their behavior is just infuriating! Clearly, SELF-INTEREST exceeds any other interest.... their self-interest in getting re-elected. Hopefully every single one of them will lose in the next election and they will then get what they deserve....no more cushy political job. Certainly at some point, these old Tea Party folks will pass on of old age. Unfortunately, that won't happen before Oct. 17th.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:23 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030
rubbish. the republicans were tasked with getting rid of obamacare otherwise they would not have been elected to office, and given majority control of the house. and since when is fighting bad law now a bad thing to do? obamcare is bad law in so many ways. it is unworkable and the democrats know it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,176,681 times
Reputation: 4233
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
They like to call Obama the dictator, but think about it:

ACA was passed legally, per the Constitutional process, through the House, Senate, and White House. And it withstood Supreme Court review.

Boehner and his buddies have not mustered the electoral support to pass anything through the legislative process. They are a minority and are using threats against our livelihoods to try to dictate what they want.

And we know that most Americans strongly disapprove of what they are doing, even more than they disapprove of Obama and the Democrats, so they are clearly not interested in representing the "will of the people."

So who's the one trying to be the dictator: the one who went through the Constitutional process and achieve a valid result, or the one unilaterally demanding that the majority do certain things under the threat of national economic recession?

I guess you were for slavery too. That was passed and upheld by the Supreme Court. Were the Republican abolitionists in congress "terrorists" or "dictators" for not agreeing and working to get the law changed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,122,798 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
They like to call Obama the dictator, but think about it:

ACA was passed legally, per the Constitutional process, through the House, Senate, and White House. And it withstood Supreme Court review.

Boehner and his buddies have not mustered the electoral support to pass anything through the legislative process. They are a minority and are using threats against our livelihoods to try to dictate what they want.

And we know that most Americans strongly disapprove of what they are doing, even more than they disapprove of Obama and the Democrats, so they are clearly not interested in representing the "will of the people."

So who's the one trying to be the dictator: the one who went through the Constitutional process and achieve a valid result, or the one unilaterally demanding that the majority do certain things under the threat of national economic recession?
They're not doing the will of the people?

Were you laughing when you wrote that?!?? You must have been, because it's a terrible joke.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...cd/hcpolls.jpg

Legal or not, Constitutional or not, THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT OBAMACARE!

/thread

Last edited by CaseyB; 10-04-2013 at 11:42 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:28 AM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,456,732 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
rubbish. the republicans were tasked with getting rid of obamacare otherwise they would not have been elected to office, and given majority control of the house. and since when is fighting bad law now a bad thing to do? obamcare is bad law in so many ways. it is unworkable and the democrats know it.
Newsflash: having the majority of the House does not give you a mandate to get rid of Obamacare.

Having sufficient electoral support across the House, Senate, and/or White House does. Why they work on that part...

Also, if people annointed the conservative nutjobs in the House to crash the economy unless they got their way, then how come most people HATE them - even more than they hate Obama and the Democrats?

Clearly, what you're saying is rubbish as it does not square with reality.


Tea Party Support Dwindles to Near-Record Low

Quote:
As Washington braces for another budget showdown, this time with the threat of defunding the new healthcare law in the mix, the key political force pushing for conservative policies sees diminished popular support. Fewer Americans now describe themselves as supporters of the Tea Party movement than did at the height of the movement in 2010, or even at the start of 2012. Today's 22% support nearly matches the record low found two years ago.

Why the shutdown looks so bad for the GOP - CBS News

Quote:
Public opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to the GOP strategy. Republican Sen. John McCain tweeted a Quinnipiac poll Tuesday morning that shows 72 percent of Americans oppose Congress "shutting down major activities of the federal government" as a way to stop the Affordable Care Act from going into effect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:29 AM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,497,657 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malibu Mike3 View Post
I like to call Teapublicans 'economic terrorists' ... but fine work nonetheless...
Aaron Sorkin penned the appropriate phrase to describe this ilk in our society: the American Taliban.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Maine
2,505 posts, read 3,407,676 times
Reputation: 3863
Nice try, but few people are obtuse enough to think Obama has not played a significant role in this little drama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 11:35 AM
 
293 posts, read 250,165 times
Reputation: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
You were saying?


Why doesn't that old coward show his face?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top