Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:19 PM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,497,657 times
Reputation: 3510

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
..... when you win elections on your major platform, you get the mandate that goes with the win.
Yes, I'll agree. So why don't you recognize that a central issue in the last Presidential election was the ACA - with Obama continuing to endorse the Congressional approval of the legislation, and Mr. Romney vowing to do away with it? The President was selected by a majority of the voters to run this country, with the full knowledge that he would continue to support the Congressionally-approved, and Supreme Court verified (constitutionality) ACA. Elections have consequences, as Sen. McCain said the other day. All credible, bi-partisan polling this past week shows overwhelming support of those asked ... to disconnect discussion of the ACA from the financial struggle between the House and the Senate. The American Taliban needs to recognize that and respect the will of the people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:41 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,541,024 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
newsflash for you, the republicans RAN on getting rid of obamacare in both 2010 and 2012, and guess what, they won the house back in 2010, and gained seats in senate on both election years. THAT gives them the mandate to get rid of obamacare. when you win elections on your major platform, you get the mandate that goes with the win.
Oh, the irony. What about the President's mandate? Didn't he run on proposing Obamacare?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:47 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,456,732 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Wow, your economy crashed? How exactly does being responsible, crash an economy, but borrowing tens of trillions, that you cant afford, not?

And if a small group cant be responsible for governing, then clearly that means the large group is responsible for the shut down..

hypocrite..
Withholding paychecks from 2 millions Americans and threatening not pay bills already owed in order to get what you want is not responsible behavior.

A small group can be responsible for extortion, as we're discovering today. They have to extort to get their way because they don't have the support to legislate.

The hypocrites are conservatives who claim to love the Constitution and have the "will of the people" on their side when they resort to hostage-taking to stop Constitutionally-valid laws from taking effect and when all the polls show how much Americans HATE them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:50 PM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,264,862 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
So Republicans arent responsible for shutting down government then?

Either the electorial process mattes, thus the left wing kook whining over the process isnt justified, or polls matter, and thus the election process is meaningless..

both cant be true.. Which is it?
That ... makes no sense.

The electoral process matters, and it ain't the left whining about it.

The polls matter, which confirm the results of the most recent electoral process.

I think you should put down whatever you're smoking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:52 PM
 
19,023 posts, read 25,974,579 times
Reputation: 7365
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
They like to call Obama the dictator, but think about it:

ACA was passed legally, per the Constitutional process, through the House, Senate, and White House. And it withstood Supreme Court review.

Boehner and his buddies have not mustered the electoral support to pass anything through the legislative process. They are a minority and are using threats against our livelihoods to try to dictate what they want.

And we know that most Americans strongly disapprove of what they are doing, even more than they disapprove of Obama and the Democrats, so they are clearly not interested in representing the "will of the people."

So who's the one trying to be the dictator: the one who went through the Constitutional process and achieve a valid result, or the one unilaterally demanding that the majority do certain things under the threat of national economic recession?
Like Hell it was...... Are you in the habit to sign your name to legal documents you never read?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:54 PM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,264,862 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac_Muz View Post
Like Hell it was...... Are you in the habit to sign your name to legal documents you never read?
Nice try ... but the whole thing was perfectly legal. AND confirmed by the Supreme Court.

Why do you hate the American system of governance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:55 PM
 
1,519 posts, read 1,228,286 times
Reputation: 898
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT OBAMACARE!

/thread
They just want what's in it. And they really like it if it's called the "Affordable Care Act" rather than "Obamacare."



Six of One - Obamacare vs. The Affordable Care Act - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:57 PM
 
1,519 posts, read 1,228,286 times
Reputation: 898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
I am talking about AMERICANS. They want it delayed!!!! MANY want it defunded, the MAJORITY want it delayed.

Fox News Poll: Voters support delaying Obamacare, but oppose defunding it

Fox News Poll: Voters support delaying Obamacare, but oppose defunding it | Fox News

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/inte...rove-congress/
Hm, four independent polls versus Fox, which is known to be highly biased... Alrighty, then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 02:09 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,456,732 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac_Muz View Post
Like Hell it was...... Are you in the habit to sign your name to legal documents you never read?
It was legit, can't help that you and the rest of the tea party ilk are sore losers about it. It can be legitimately repealed if opponents win enough electoral support to pass a repeal into law.

If you don't like to abide by the Constitution, then...sorry, you're not going to like living here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2013, 02:25 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,982,916 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
That is fine and dandy but the republicans have failed to articulate a better healthcare delivery system. And please spare me the cross state line and tort BS, because those will not fix this mess period, and they know it. The republican party is told by the insurance companies to rebel as much as they can although several of these companies are going to make plenty of money because of Obamacare. But, they know as anyone else, overtime this hootananny is going to end and morph into a delivery system they will not like at all. So, the alternative is move the pig back to the slop house.
So let me get this straight. Our previous health insurance system was so awful, it had to be replaced IMMEDIATELY with ObamaCare, or old people would die, and children would suffer.

But this current health insurance system is far worse, with higher costs and more regulation, but there's no need to change is ever.

Do I have that about right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top