Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-13-2013, 09:41 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
Are you admitting you are incapable of reading a few paragraphs? Or just don't want to?
You provided a page of links however it's just a page of links.


What I'm asking specifically which (or any) of those studies cited on that page directly polled scientists. Going back to the the fourth post in this topic and the first one I made:

Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
....I don't want links to Wikipedia, I don't want links to some page proclaiming it... I want specific references ...
I'm not going to play games becsue the minute I go through the trouble of showing how you're wrong you'll disappear or ignore it. Pick anyone.... just one....

 
Old 12-13-2013, 10:19 AM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,285,496 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
How about first putting an explanation to your incomplete thought.
I was showing that the guy saying "A ha! Temperatures fluctuate cyclically!" doesn't know how to read a graph.
 
Old 12-13-2013, 10:48 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun View Post
I was showing that the guy saying "A ha! Temperatures fluctuate cyclically!" doesn't know how to read a graph.
He's 100% correct, there is repeated pattern in that graph. That's what cyclical means.
 
Old 12-13-2013, 11:05 AM
 
1,143 posts, read 1,080,347 times
Reputation: 722
Meteorologist Joe Bastardi: Christmas in U.S. may be coldest since 1989, ranking 3rd coldest in last 50 years behind 1989 and 1983


Meteorologist Joe Bastardi: Christmas in U.S. may be coldest since 1989, ranking 3rd coldest in last 50 years behind 1989 and 1983 | Climate Depot


Joe Bastardi challenges the conventional wisdom on climate change. - YouTube
Meteorologist Joe Bastardi thinks the conventional wisdom on climate change is all wrong.
 
Old 12-13-2013, 12:16 PM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,680,436 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
My point is Seabass does not know what cyclical means.

Denier land: How deniers view global warming - YouTube

The video is about 2 1/2 minutes long and presents graphs of global warming and other graphs on how the deniers that CO2 is driving man-made global warming, attempt to distort the facts. Then it adds graphs with demonstrating how CO2 correlates to the warming. A clear picture of how deniers attempt to misrepresent reality.
 
Old 12-13-2013, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,285,496 times
Reputation: 1072
I mean, I'm really staggered. Repeated pattern?


Really?



It's like being told 2+3=hippopotamus.
 
Old 12-13-2013, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,285,496 times
Reputation: 1072
No, I can't leave this alone. Tell me, O learned one, how many times the pattern repeats? How many times does it reach the low? The high?
 
Old 12-13-2013, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,285,496 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Here's two graphs that represent the exact same data, cyclical or increasing with time?
They don't represent the exact same data. One is a measure of sea level, and shows a constant slope (in this case, rate of increaase). The other represents the slope (rate of increase), and as you can see, it's constant. If they were the same, both would represent meters/year. They don't. The top one is in meters, the bottom one in meters/year.

You don't know how to read a graph.
 
Old 12-13-2013, 04:12 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,387,159 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
You provided a page of links however it's just a page of links.


What I'm asking specifically which (or any) of those studies cited on that page directly polled scientists. Going back to the the fourth post in this topic and the first one I made:



I'm not going to play games becsue the minute I go through the trouble of showing how you're wrong you'll disappear or ignore it. Pick anyone.... just one....
Still trying to deflect from the fact that you were wrong when you claimed the Doran study was the ONLY one which directly polled scientists?

Still trying to deflect from the fact that you agreed with Glitch who told some whopping lies about the Doran study?

You've already been proven wrong. You just won't accept it.

 
Old 12-13-2013, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
Still trying to deflect from the fact that you were wrong when you claimed the Doran study was the ONLY one which directly polled scientists?

Still trying to deflect from the fact that you agreed with Glitch who told some whopping lies about the Doran study?

You've already been proven wrong. You just won't accept it.

Everything I posted about the Doran survery was absolutely true. Out of the 10,257 earth scientists asked to participate, only 77 actually responded. Of those 77, 75 claimed that humans significantly contributed to global warming.

I realize this factual information exposes your lies about a "97%" consensus, but that is what happens when you fabricate complete nonsense in a vain attempt to push your fascist Marxist agenda.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top