Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-13-2013, 03:26 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,464,007 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Do you mean to "investment real-estate"? You do realize that the government solution is either government high rises or investment deductions to people who invest in real-estate so they can rent to people like you right?

Your solution: take away investment deductions.

Result: Landlords raise your rent or don't invest in the first place. Prices go up because either their cost of doing business increases or people won't invest. Less rentals are available, prices increase further or if you can't find a place you get to live in a high rise.

Think freemkt, think!



Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero
no not a VAT

a replacement of the current...at the end user level....ie retail

www.fair-tax.org



Referring specifically to the FairTax - homeowners enjoy untaxed housing consumption while those who can't buy a home indefinitely pay tax up the wazoo on their rent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-13-2013, 03:29 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,375,883 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
They have lower inequality because they're not overly dependent on the top earners for tax revenue, so the incentive to keep the wide income gap in order to maximize tax revenue doesn't exist in Europe as it does in the U.S.

More, here:
http://www.city-data.com/forum/32587552-post99.html
Read that before, not buying it. It fails simple logic. The politicians don't really care about tax revenue. They care about their job, and their income. Thats going to drive increased wealth inequality. If they cared about maximizing tax revenue they would increase taxes. You're deflecting with opinions, that fail simple logic test.....lol....in my opinion.

Seriously, you want to drive an idea for a flat tax? You've bought into some well funded think tanks proposed by the .1%. And you are never ever going to get it. Seriously.

Do you honestly ever see any way in which that idea could come about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2013, 03:39 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
??? What exactly are childless burger flippers getting, except a positive tax liability?
Much more in federal government services and benefits than they're paying for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2013, 03:44 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Ironic, you are offended these families are accused of not paying taxes but have no issue of Obama accusing others of not paying enough taxes. How's payback working for you? Now pay your fair share like the rest of us.

I pay an asinine amount in taxes yet it's ok for Obama to run around the country ranting I don't pay enough. To which I say he can kiss my ass.
Whing! That went right over your head.

I'm not offended by any accusations. I'm offended by people making assertions without any foundation. I'm tired of the lack of logic, the lack of simple argumentation. When you make an argument, you build a foundation for that argument. A FACTUAL foundation. You don't assert that A (an entity, person, family, business, organization) is doing something, unless you have the facts to support that assertion. I'm sick of people making assertions, and then saying, "Well, I based that on averages, or guesstimates, or my fantasies..." Don't ASSERT something unless you can back it up. In this case, IC could have said, "According to IRS statistics most families with that income pay this percentage in taxes." That would have been an accurate statement. But that's not what IC did. IC made statements about a specific family. And that's a problem. Because when people make these logical leaps of faith, they are abandoning logic. There are no leaps of faith in logic. There are no leaps of faith in debate. There are no leaps of faith in argumentation. There are assertions that have to be defended with FACTS, with KNOWLEDGE, with SPECIFICS. And I'm tired of people who don't understand the simple rules of logic breaking those rules and then dancing around it when they are called on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2013, 03:51 PM
 
8,289 posts, read 13,567,226 times
Reputation: 5018
Yes the "rich" do pay a lot of taxes. They also get the most "loopholes" and "tax breaks". Remember when Warren Buffet said he paid less in taxes percentage wise than his own Secretary? How about Mitt Romney?
Cry me a river please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2013, 04:09 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Read that before, not buying it.
Of course not. It's much easier to whine and complain than to use critical thinking sills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2013, 04:12 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiRob View Post
Yes the "rich" do pay a lot of taxes. They also get the most "loopholes" and "tax breaks".
Really? If that's so, why do they pay the highest effective tax rates? So high that they're paying TWICE their fair share?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2013, 04:39 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,375,883 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Of course not. It's much easier to whine and complain than to use critical thinking sills.
Ahh and its much easier to accuse people of things, and denigrate them. Got it.

Seriously I disagree with you and you start saying I am whining, complaining, and not using my critical thinking skills? You have proved me wrong before with facts, but this is just your opinion or belief. So you just start insulting? I expect better from you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2013, 04:44 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,375,883 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Really? If that's so, why do they pay the highest effective tax rates? So high that they're paying TWICE their fair share?
You define fair share as everyone should pay the same? The same % I presume.

whereas I dont think its fair to tax a persons income that is required for their food, shelter, and basic needs. But to you taxing that is fair? Define "Fair" in your mind?

I pay around 22% (just off the top estimate-not based on actual numbers) in taxes. Which represents approx 50% of my after basic requirements for my family expenses. Maybe more. Am I being taxed fairly?

A minimum wage earner is being taxed nothing, but all of his money but 2% say goes to support him in the basics. Is he being taxed fairly?

A multibillionaire is being taxed at 22%, which represents 22.1% of his after basic requirements expenses.

Who here is being taxed fairly? Who isn't? Is it fair to tax the income that pays for necessities? Should tax rates then vary by the cost of living where you live?

Quit whining about what is considered some of the lowest effective tax rates in the world.

Last edited by greywar; 12-13-2013 at 04:45 PM.. Reason: ps-yes I got the whining comment in, but didnt feel motivated enough to add in a "critical thinking" comment
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2013, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiRob View Post
Yes the "rich" do pay a lot of taxes. They also get the most "loopholes" and "tax breaks". Remember when Warren Buffet said he paid less in taxes percentage wise than his own Secretary? How about Mitt Romney?
Cry me a river please.
actually the most tax breaks go to those making 180k or less

and warren buffett lied
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top