Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-05-2014, 04:13 PM
 
Location: No Mask For Me This Time, Either
5,663 posts, read 5,092,159 times
Reputation: 6088

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
I don't want a socialist to inhabit the WH, plain and simple.
Too late on that one...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-05-2014, 04:43 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,722,601 times
Reputation: 23296
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
So, you concede, this thread has nothing to do with whether Bill Clinton had an affair with Elizabeth Hurley, or whether Tom Sizemore is desperate for money, and will do anything to increase sales of his book, but rather, it's just another thread aimed at slamming Hillary Clinton?

I mean, that's your point, right? You have got to SLAM Hillary Clinton, because somehow you think that Bill Clinton's infidelity reflects badly on Hillary Clinton, and that that will somehow work against her politically.

The fact is, Bill Clinton's character flaws are Bill Clinton's flaws. Hillary Clinton's decision to stay married to a flawed man is no different than the millions of women in this country who decide every day to stay married to flawed and imperfect men. Each marriage is unique, the two people involved are the only ones who get to decide the boundaries and limits of their relationship, and it is no one else's business.

Until you understand that, you and other conservatives seeking a way to SLAM Hillary Clinton, will continue to find yourselves at odds with other Americans.

Focus your attention on what you don't like about her political policies and proposals. Keep the personal attacks to a minimum. And refrain from telling us what you don't like about her looks. Because that's a mature, intelligent opposition that others can appreciate. Doing otherwise makes you look immature, less than intelligent, and weak.

Your constant defense of an admitted womanizer, abuser, rapist and his complict wife is all but telling that your willing to overlook crimes against women as long as it gets your "Heroine" elected.

You play the middle of the road intellectual character very well. Unfortunately for you the partisan cracks in your character have shown through in this little thread.

I will agree that yes Bill has flaws in his character that allowed him to rape and abuse women throughout his political career with impunity under the umbrella of defense by people like you. Hillary on the other hand is beyond the pale in the defense of his behavior and threats against the women he crimminaly assualted.

This thread is just one more brick in the wall of the Clinton Memorial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 05:30 PM
 
46,307 posts, read 27,131,867 times
Reputation: 11135
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
I'm personally tired of the petty partisanship that makes up the bulk of our discourse these days. I prefer actual discussions of policies, and facts that actually lead to meaningful conversations about how to resolve our problems. Because we have very real problems, and we desperately need a government able and willing to address those problems. But instead, people like to attack Mrs Clinton and Mrs Obama for their looks. Because that's going to lead to a productive discourse.....in nutso-whacko land. In the real world, it's time for people to grow up. Instead of acting like 12-year-old boys mucking it up in the bathroom over how the new science teacher's glasses look.
Yet the ONLY people in this thread you have responded to, you would consider righties....


Why is that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 05:53 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,550,525 times
Reputation: 6392
Doesn't anyone remember when Hillary moved out of the White House?

They're married, sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 05:56 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,213,094 times
Reputation: 1640
lucky SOB, Hurley is super hot
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 05:58 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,395,454 times
Reputation: 18436
Default Utter nonsense

You Pubs are terrified of Hillary Clinton running for office, so you are attempting this crap? This makes about as much sense as the classless Red Hot Chili Peppers interrupting an exceptional performance by Bruno Mars during the halftime Super Bowl show.

The new GOP strategy:

1) Ignore our enormous shortcomings as shown by 8 years of Bush and regressive obstructionism ever since.

2) Continue to focus on negativity and deceptive marketing.

3) Attack the credibility of Bill Clinton since he has the ability to annihilate us with a single speech.

4) Hope we damage Bill enough to negatively impact his marriage with Hillary, so Hillary doesn't run.

5) Pray that the negativity suckers people into believing that the GOP is the better choice.

Simply pathetic beyond belief.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,424,105 times
Reputation: 4190
Hillary probably watched...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 06:33 PM
 
8,016 posts, read 5,864,961 times
Reputation: 9682
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusNexus View Post
You Pubs are terrified of Hillary Clinton running for office, so you are attempting this crap? This makes about as much sense as the classless Red Hot Chili Peppers interrupting an exceptional performance by Bruno Mars during the halftime Super Bowl show.

The new GOP strategy:

1) Ignore our enormous shortcomings as shown by 8 years of Bush and regressive obstructionism ever since.

2) Continue to focus on negativity and deceptive marketing.

3) Attack the credibility of Bill Clinton since he has the ability to annihilate us with a single speech.

4) Hope we damage Bill enough to negatively impact his marriage with Hillary, so Hillary doesn't run.

5) Pray that the negativity suckers people into believing that the GOP is the better choice.

Simply pathetic beyond belief.

"I'll take 'Comedy Gold' for $2000, Alex."



For the record, they don't have a marriage. They have a mutually beneficial business arrangement. There is a difference, you know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 07:11 PM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,337,216 times
Reputation: 8066
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusNexus View Post
You Pubs are terrified of Hillary Clinton running for office, so you are attempting this crap?
Dude, the GOP is salivating to run against Hillary. You guys didn't want her in 2008, what on earth makes you think she is more popular today? Especially after she lost all her credibility working for Obama...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 07:15 PM
 
46,307 posts, read 27,131,867 times
Reputation: 11135
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusNexus View Post
You Pubs are terrified of Hillary Clinton running for office, so you are attempting this crap? This makes about as much sense as the classless Red Hot Chili Peppers interrupting an exceptional performance by Bruno Mars during the halftime Super Bowl show.

The new GOP strategy:

1) Ignore our enormous shortcomings as shown by 8 years of Bush and regressive obstructionism ever since.

2) Continue to focus on negativity and deceptive marketing.

3) Attack the credibility of Bill Clinton since he has the ability to annihilate us with a single speech.

4) Hope we damage Bill enough to negatively impact his marriage with Hillary, so Hillary doesn't run.

5) Pray that the negativity suckers people into believing that the GOP is the better choice.

Simply pathetic beyond belief.
Yes, continuing to blame bush is truly pathetic...

2 ,3, 4,and 5, are as expected, just useless drivel.....oh wait...I take that back....1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are useless drivel...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top