Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-27-2014, 06:51 PM
 
2,672 posts, read 2,720,763 times
Reputation: 1041

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
The reason for the mandate is actuarial. Like any insurance pool, it needs to be large enough to pencil out. I'm sure this was a huge issue as the ACA was developed, I doubt it surprises anyone that this is the biggest problem people have with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
I know because the core design of the law was bad, not to mention all of the wholly unnecessary components added to it. There is more than one way to skin a cat.
Where is the Tea Party-Republican solution? There isnt any is there?...nothing absolutely nothing. The Coburn-Burr-Hatch plan had taxes and penalties just as the ACA. If you drop out or dont get insurance you get penalized when you try to get back in. Other than that its a lot like Obamacare...complete with subsidies. Republican subsidies good...Obama subsidies bad...very bad.

 
Old 04-27-2014, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,774,879 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patricius Maximus View Post
Republicans would surely have created and passed their own reforms if Obamacare wasn't the health care rod and if they didn't have to deal with Harry Reid obstructing all their bills. Heck, there was a Republican plan some were trying to push as early as 2007 (source). Not that I (or the Tea Party) like it too much, but it's very likely that sans-Obamacare some version of health care reform would have happened.
Despite all that, it was in fact the Ds and Obama who did the heavy lifting and got something done.

Remember Bush's second term, and the strength he had in Congress? Coulda, woulda, shoulda doesn't count now.

Health care affordability has been an issue for about two decades. At any time in those two decades, Rs could have defined the issues and gotten in front of it. But - they didn't.
 
Old 04-27-2014, 07:02 PM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,884,750 times
Reputation: 9510
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ View Post
Very sad for America and you choose to give your rights away and buy a forced plan? What wrong with you?
Nothing wrong with me, but if anything is wrong in the future, I now have health insurance to cover it. And no, I'm not getting a handout. I am self-employed and pay plenty of taxes, and now I'm also paying for my own health insurance.
 
Old 04-27-2014, 07:07 PM
Status: "Let's replace the puppet show with actual leadership." (set 4 days ago)
 
Location: Suburban Dallas
52,709 posts, read 48,010,235 times
Reputation: 33905
Quote:
Yeah, but the reality is that Republican opposition to the ACA has always been steeped in the idea that it will be too popular to repeal once all the provisions are in place and in full use.

That nightmare is slowly coming true for Repubs. Not that there was ever any chance of repeal.
Sure, it's going to be a nightmare. And we're going to regret not repealing this when the government makes prices skyrocket after they eliminate all the insurance companies. You think you're getting a good deal now, but in the end, everybody loses.
 
Old 04-27-2014, 07:10 PM
Status: "Let's replace the puppet show with actual leadership." (set 4 days ago)
 
Location: Suburban Dallas
52,709 posts, read 48,010,235 times
Reputation: 33905
Quote:
Where is the Tea Party-Republican solution? There isnt any is there?...nothing absolutely nothing.
Wrong. There is a conservative (and better) solution. It's called the free market system.
 
Old 04-27-2014, 07:14 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,397,951 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by case44 View Post
Sure, it's going to be a nightmare. And we're going to regret not repealing this when the government makes prices skyrocket after they eliminate all the insurance companies. You think you're getting a good deal now, but in the end, everybody loses.
You obviously missed all of the double digit price increases year after year for the last couple decades.

Yay free market systems.....

Seriously the healthcare system was broken before, this is a bandaid on a foot amputation. We need single payer. "Free market systems" on something like this was a complete disaster.
 
Old 04-27-2014, 07:19 PM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,884,750 times
Reputation: 9510
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
You obviously missed all of the double digit price increases year after year for the last couple decades.
Yep. I was getting increases every six months when I was last in the market 10 years ago, until I was finally priced out completely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Seriously the healthcare system was broken before, this is a bandaid on a foot amputation. We need single payer. "Free market systems" on something like this was a complete disaster.
Amen!
 
Old 04-27-2014, 07:33 PM
 
3,617 posts, read 3,888,260 times
Reputation: 2295
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post
Nothing wrong with me, but if anything is wrong in the future, I now have health insurance to cover it. And no, I'm not getting a handout. I am self-employed and pay plenty of taxes, and now I'm also paying for my own health insurance.
Well, that depends.

If you are getting a subsidy, you are. If you were a poor underwriting risk before, you are effectively getting one from people whose rates shot up as yours went down (or you were able to buy on the individual market at all). If your rates stayed about the same or went up, then you're not getting a handout and may in fact be subsidizing other people. Depending on your location, you also may or may not be a beneficiary of insurer under-pricing and have a policy that the insurer is taking a loss on this year.

It's not so simple as "And no, I'm not getting a handout," because that may or may not be the case depending on your personal circumstances. I'm not saying you did necessarily, but just because you're paying taxes and premiums doesn't mean you aren't either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Despite all that, it was in fact the Ds and Obama who did the heavy lifting and got something done.

Remember Bush's second term, and the strength he had in Congress? Coulda, woulda, shoulda doesn't count now.

Health care affordability has been an issue for about two decades. At any time in those two decades, Rs could have defined the issues and gotten in front of it. But - they didn't.
"Change" - whether as a slogan or in the form of a policy, is only a good thing if it is better than the status quo. If you make a change that is worse than things were before, you can't blame the other party for not going out and doing something productive before you went out and did something harmful. Making things worse than they were before is all on the Democrats who passed the ACA without a single Republican vote.
 
Old 04-27-2014, 07:45 PM
 
3,617 posts, read 3,888,260 times
Reputation: 2295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
I still support the public option game plan.

Probably combined with the Medicaids and Medicare. Basically a means tested, with copays and deductibles, Medicare for all who want and need it.

But we need to always keep our private options open for those with the desire and the means.

My daughter also has a rare condition that no private plan would cover. Now she has good coverage with recent HC reforms. So we need to keep our options open. Public and private.
It's very easy to argue for a means tested public universal option when you expect to be getting the good rather than footing the bill. Not so easy to get swing voting members of the middle class to do so when the bill comes in. Look at what's going on in Vermont right now. Super liberal state in terms of both the electorate and the elected officials, lower per capita healthcare costs than the country as a whole, and they're not exactly having an easy time figuring out how to pay for the part of their UHC bill not covered by the feds, and the whole thing could very well still unravel over the issue.
 
Old 04-27-2014, 08:02 PM
 
18,847 posts, read 8,492,947 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity View Post
It's very easy to argue for a means tested public universal option when you expect to be getting the good rather than footing the bill. Not so easy to get swing voting members of the middle class to do so when the bill comes in. Look at what's going on in Vermont right now. Super liberal state in terms of both the electorate and the elected officials, lower per capita healthcare costs than the country as a whole, and they're not exactly having an easy time figuring out how to pay for the part of their UHC bill not covered by the feds, and the whole thing could very well still unravel over the issue.
I have often said and still believe that states cannot cover the HC costs of their people. It takes the power and size of the Feds, of course along with some new money creation along the way.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top