Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And yet you guys still try to pretend your argument is worth listening to. It's weird: you obviously understand why the right's claims have no merit, but you whine about people who point out that the right's claims have no merit. Why support positions you know have no merit? Why continue to embarrass yourselves for the sake of the idiots in the Republican party?
These are rhetorical questions.
Better make that 96.5% instead of 97%. He was one of them they counted.
The subject here seems to be conflict of interest, not so much the climate debate. Not saying one isn't connected to the other issue, but conflict of interest is the focus here.
quote: Top climate expert's sensational claim of government meddling in crucial UN report
Officials from all main countries 'insisted on changes in late-night meeting'
Intervention amounts to 'serious conflict of interest', claims Harvard prof
IPCC reports are supposed to be independent as they help shape policy
A top US academic has dramatically revealed how government officials forced him to change a hugely influential scientific report on climate change to suit their own interests.
....
He said the officials, representing ‘all the main countries and regions of the world’ insisted on the changes in a late-night meeting at a Berlin conference centre two weeks ago.
Three quarters of the original version of the document ended up being deleted.
....
Prof Stavins claimed the intervention amounted to a serious ‘conflict of interest’ between scientists and governments. His revelation is significant because it is rare for climate change experts to publicly question the process behind the compilation of reports on the subject.
Prof Stavins, Harvard’s Professor of Business and Government, was one of two ‘co-ordinating lead authors’ of a key report published by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) earlier this month.
Your blogs undergo no scientific scrutiny. Anyone can write anything they choose in a blog. As scientific references, they are worthless. Whining about me does not magically give your blogs scientific worth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun
It wasn't meant to be useful to you, it was meant to show how intellectually dishonest right-wingers are. Now whine about me some more, that will make your economist magically turn into someone whose opinion on this subject is worth listening to. Give it a shot.
talk about intellectual dishonesty, you are doing that in spades my friend. you keep making claims that the right doesnt go through "peer review", but when papers are submitted that dont bow to what the leftists want, they dont get peer reviewed. stop with the dishonesty on your side.
It wasn't meant to be useful to you, it was meant to show how intellectually dishonest right-wingers are. Now whine about me some more, that will make your economist magically turn into someone whose opinion on this subject is worth listening to. Give it a shot.
And left wingers aren't any better....Lets see if you can learn something from this video.
talk about intellectual dishonesty, you are doing that in spades my friend. you keep making claims that the right doesnt go through "peer review", but when papers are submitted that dont bow to what the leftists want, they dont get peer reviewed. stop with the dishonesty on your side.
Even if true, and I have no reason to think that's the case, it still wouldn't magically turn your blogs into scientific resources. All of your arguments would be just as worthless as they are now and you'd still be a denialist who would rather whine and cry about me than try to show his claims have merit. Instead of providing facts to support the claims you make, you whine about leftists.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
