Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-20-2014, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Somewhere extremely awesome
3,130 posts, read 3,076,339 times
Reputation: 2472

Advertisements

Like for real, the ACA was found to be unconstitutional, or we elected 70 percent Republicans to Congress in 2014 and they passed legislation to overturn it. Everything mandated in the ACA was now left to choice, so for example, an insurance company could choose to allow young people to stay on their parents' insurance until they turn 26, but would not be required to do so.

What do you think insurance companies would do? Do you think it would be an overall positive or an overall negative?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-20-2014, 10:18 AM
 
Location: Missouri
4,272 posts, read 3,789,619 times
Reputation: 1937
If the ACA was repealed today, there would be millions of people who have insurance that they cannot afford, and millions more who would have their insurance rates jacked up because of pre-existing conditions.

If the Republicans had a plan to replace the ACA, then it would take months, maybe years to implement their plan, if they do at all.

My rates have gone up since ACA implementation, although they were rising years before implementation. I'm still looking for an easing of those rate increases due to the millions more insurance carriers, but it hasn't happened. So, I've consigned myself to the fact that rates will increase whether the ACA is here or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 10:19 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,549,057 times
Reputation: 6392
Most people's insurance rates would go down substantially.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 10:21 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030
i think that current policies wont be affected, as insurance companies will have planned for just such an eventuality. perhaps old policies will be reinstated so that people will have that option again, but somethings have changed that will be hard to overcome, such as hospitals absorbing some private practices, and setting up networks that wont be easily dismantled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,899,377 times
Reputation: 11259
Myself, A 55 YEAR OLD MALE, would not have to have maternity coverage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 10:24 AM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,775 posts, read 18,834,175 times
Reputation: 22621
It would revert to what it was before, which was voluntary rather than mandated participation.

Your question would be like asking, after everyone has been forced to buy a new Lexus, what it would be like if we could choose to buy or not buy a car. What is liberty like? You tell me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 10:27 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,213,992 times
Reputation: 55008
I think Obama would cry like a little girl.

And Pulosi's face would melt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Missouri
4,272 posts, read 3,789,619 times
Reputation: 1937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Most people's insurance rates would go down substantially.
Lucky them, my rates over the last decade have increased beyond the officially declared inflation rate, and I see no reason why they would decrease over the next few years with or without the ACA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 11:11 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,466,947 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC View Post
It would revert to what it was before, which was voluntary rather than mandated participation.
Or, in the case of people with pre-existing conditions, mandated non-participation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 11:16 AM
 
46,968 posts, read 26,011,859 times
Reputation: 29458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Most people's insurance rates would go down substantially.
Except for sick people, of course. But that's not the concern of the insurance companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top