Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-05-2014, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
3,674 posts, read 3,041,285 times
Reputation: 5467

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
I don't think anyone is "butthurt" about this. We are smart enough to see skewed stats and Canada has such a small population compared to the US. How many millionaires in Canada compared to the US?

How much of their assets are held by Americans? And we have far more wealth middle classers than they do. They don't have the sheer numbers of immigrants and others living below the income line that qualifies one for middle class status.

If Canada was a US state, they wouldn't even be our most important state.
While I DO agree with the bolded portion of your post, I still am curious as to whyt sheer numbers of millionaires even matters?. I know that's all that seems to matter to americans, but what about their higher Quality of Life?? Doesn't that mean more?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2014, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,346,330 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
Is this random question day today?

You tell me, would Texas and Alaska be better off or worse off without the oil revenue?

All I said is the truth, oil funds Canada's social programs. And they control their population much better than the US. Don't believe it? Try immigrating to Canada and see what happens.

They aren't welcoming at all unless you have a specific reason to immigrate there. No place for refugees or the poor. They let the US bear that brunt along with their military security and everything else we do for them.
Lol! Yes, we should let in every Tom, Dick and Hairy because YOU can't control YOUR borders.

Everything else you do for us? Like what?
When you needed to get your astronauts back to earth, you turned to us,
When you needed to have your hostages rescued, you turned to us.
When you needed a place for your planes to land, you turned to us.
When you had natural disasters, you turned to us.
When you wanted backup for your ridiculous and unneccessary wars, you turned to us.
We even built your big cities, bridges and skyscrapers!

What, pray tell, have you done for us beside keep us safe from imaginary foes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 12:38 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,416,072 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucknow View Post
Canada is not now and never has been socialist. What we have here is a regulated free enterprise system. Just because there are social programmes and some progressive laws, that does in no way at all equals "Socialism". What we have is not even 1% SOCIALISM.
Hey, I was agreeing with you.. hence "socialism" in my post is in placed in quotation marks.

The American right-wing has no clue what socialism actually is. Canada is no where near socialist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 12:38 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,368,221 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by danglecity8819 View Post
Thank you for stating the obvious, but you're missing the point. The British soldiers who burned down the White House were from the UK. They had been sent over from Europe.
Why does it matter where the troops were FROM?
We invaded Canada (which was a BRITISH COLONY) and in return the White House was burned down. The British drew troops from all over their empire. The fact that the specific soldiers were from the British Isles (and a contingent of Black free slaves from the Carribean). It was all people of the same enormous empire and they were ALL British subjects.
If you are going to split hairs, the wingnut comment about "US" defeating Canada in the French & Indian War is not correct either - for a number of reasons: First off "WE" were NOT AMERICANS at the time, Secondly, Id be surprised if anyone on this board had ancestors here in the colonies at the time (they were all subjects of some other king elsewhere). Thirdly, our enemies during the French and Indian War were NOT CANADIANS - they were the FRENCH (and their French-speaking colonists in the New World).

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 12:39 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,368,221 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
Hey, I was agreeing with you.. hence "socialism" in my post is in placed in quotation marks.

The American right-wing has no clue what socialism actually is. Canada is no where near socialist.
The American right-wing ON THIS BOARD has no clue about much of ANYTHING actually.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Chicago
94 posts, read 76,581 times
Reputation: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Why does it matter where the troops were FROM?
We invaded Canada (which was a BRITISH COLONY) and in return the White House was burned down. The British drew troops from all over their empire. The fact that the specific soldiers were from the British Isles (and a contingent of Black free slaves from the Carribean). It was all people of the same enormous empire and they were ALL British subjects.
lmao

Using this insane logic, Australians can go around saying they burned down the White House. There'd be no argument from me if the troops that attacked Washington had actually been Canadian colonists.

The fact that everyone in the empire was a British subject is irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 01:26 PM
 
25,858 posts, read 16,569,925 times
Reputation: 16040
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeaveWI View Post
While I DO agree with the bolded portion of your post, I still am curious as to whyt sheer numbers of millionaires even matters?. I know that's all that seems to matter to americans, but what about their higher Quality of Life?? Doesn't that mean more?
I don't know, there's a lot of places in the US that are pretty nice places to live with much nicer climates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 01:27 PM
 
25,858 posts, read 16,569,925 times
Reputation: 16040
Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
Lol! Yes, we should let in every Tom, Dick and Hairy because YOU can't control YOUR borders.

Everything else you do for us? Like what?
When you needed to get your astronauts back to earth, you turned to us,
When you needed to have your hostages rescued, you turned to us.
When you needed a place for your planes to land, you turned to us.
When you had natural disasters, you turned to us.
When you wanted backup for your ridiculous and unneccessary wars, you turned to us.
We even built your big cities, bridges and skyscrapers!

What, pray tell, have you done for us beside keep us safe from imaginary foes?
And California has a larger GDP than your whole country. And they don't have any oil!

Canada would be 3rd world without the oil exports.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 01:43 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,521,794 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
And they're taking in hundreds of billions of dollars in oil profits.
Along with coal, natural gas, iron oar, potash, gold, diamonds, silver, uranium, molybdenum, phosphates, nickel, copper a host of other precious metals along with timber, fish, and selling electricity to you that puts Athabaska Tar sands crude just a johnny-come-lately to the list of stuff we've got to sell.

Our very first oil well and argued to be the first North American commercial well venture was in a place called Oil Springs Ontario and dates back to 1858

History of the petroleum industry in Canada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Allendale MI
2,523 posts, read 2,206,678 times
Reputation: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
And California has a larger GDP than your whole country. And they don't have any oil!

Canada would be 3rd world without the oil exports.
Dumbest statement on this thread
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top