Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How are they "not qualifying for Medicaid" when nearly half of all U.S. births are PAID for by Medicaid?
Democrats are paying the poor to breed. So they are. They're outbreeding everyone else. Can't have an upwardly mobile society when the poor are overbreeding and dragging everyone else down with their ever-increasing needs for artificial means of financial support. That's a society in a downward spiral.
Rome succumbed to the same problem. We all know how that ended.
Well you sure made a strong argument. Its well known that all those tech start ups are being done in Georgia, the Carolinas, Alabama, Tennessee, you know, the epitome of red states. I mean none of those start ups are flocking to the bay area at all what so ever
Texas is a rare exception, due to the oil boom. And good for Texas for being blessed with an abundant resource in high demand creating good jobs. But outside those areas of work, many of the new jobs created were low paying or govt. employees
Both Austin and Dallas have booming Tech sectors.
and the idea that Texas jobs are "low paying" is a myth. It is true that the pay scale in Texas is far lower than either coasts, BUT what is not factored in is the cost of living.
If you live in Dallas and make 40K a year, then move to New York you would need $93K to maintain the same standard of living.
So this idea that Texas is a low income area is nonsense. It is a low cost of living area and that means a person can have a high standard of living without making big $$$
You actually just confirmed my argument. If the poverty rate for blacks is consistent regardless of state, why does New York (higher precentage of blacks) have lower rates of poverty than Oklahoma, Kentucky, Texas, and West Virginia?
As said, race has nothing to do with it. Conservative policies keep people in poverty. The variable is the policies, not the race.
How are they "not qualifying for Medicaid" when nearly half of all U.S. births are PAID for by Medicaid?
Democrats are paying the poor to breed. So they are. They're outbreeding everyone else. Can't have an upwardly mobile society when the poor are overbreeding and dragging everyone else down with their ever-increasing needs for artificial means of financial support. That's a society in a downward spiral.
Rome succumbed to the same problem. We all know how that ended.
??? Not every poor person breeds...in fact, many of the poor ARE NOT CAPABLE of popping out the kids that would make them eligible for Medicaid...especially the poor who live in red states, plus all of the poor who are male.
You actually just confirmed my argument. If the poverty rate for blacks is consistent regardless of state, why does New York (higher precentage of blacks) have lower rates of poverty than Oklahoma, Kentucky, Texas, and West Virginia?
As said, race has nothing to do with it. Conservative policies keep people in poverty. The variable is the policies, not the race.
Presumably because New York has higher median income than those other states. Government defines income by a specific dollar amount regardless of state.
That's why not everyone is a professional. People who work in the trades can make quite a bit of $$$, as well.
??? Not everyone can work in the trades.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.