Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What does ANY of this political commentary above have to do with the video? I didn't even watch the video because I'm at work and don't have access to Youtube, but I assume they are black or a minority of some flavor (as noted from the unfortunate devolution of the conversation to how Obama and his supporters are ruining this 'once' fine country). Sigh, I'm crawling back to the Automotive forum.
Just because someone is not definable as a Republican or a conservative it does NOT mean they are a Liberal or a Democrat. Republicans and Conservatives like to lump anyone that doesn't identify with them as Liberals/Democrats. Very few have even ever been allowed to register to vote or have even registered to vote.
Do you want credibility around here? Then don't make this mistake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1brownsfan
Not true. As a libertarian, I've been ASSumed to be an anarchist (and use the old Somalia reference), or a republican in disquise by liberals. The same goes for republicans, who ASSume that libertarians are really liberals in disguise.
no1brownsfan is correct. I do not define all those who are not Republican or conservative as liberal freaks. I have never referred to Libertarians as liberal freaks, or conservative. I refer to them as closet anarchists.
Furthermore, just because they may be registered as a Republican does not mean they are not liberal freaks. McCain is most certainly a liberal freak, considering he votes with them more often than he votes with Republicans. Giuliani, Romney, and Perry, just to name a few, are classic examples of liberal freaks pretending to be conservative Republicans, a.k.a. RINOs
Furthermore, just because they may be registered as a Republican does not mean they are not liberal freaks. McCain is most certainly a liberal freak, considering he votes with them more often than he votes with Republicans. Giuliani, Romney, and Perry, just to name a few, are classic examples of liberal freaks pretending to be conservative Republicans, a.k.a. RINOs
Anything that harms (financially, emotionally, or physically) liberal freaks is most certainly in the best interests of the nation.
You are threatening these people and should be reported.
no1brownsfan is correct. I do not define all those who are not Republican or conservative as liberal freaks. I have never referred to Libertarians as liberal freaks, or conservative. I refer to them as closet anarchists.
Furthermore, just because they may be registered as a Republican does not mean they are not liberal freaks. McCain is most certainly a liberal freak, considering he votes with them more often than he votes with Republicans. Giuliani, Romney, and Perry, just to name a few, are classic examples of liberal freaks pretending to be conservative Republicans, a.k.a. RINOs
Thanks for the props, with the exception of the anarchist reference. It's really quite simple for me. Adhere to the US Constitution, enforce the laws you already have, stop making unnecessary laws (more gun control for example) when you can't enforce the ones already on the books, and repeal unnecessary and unconstitutional laws.
Thanks for the props, with the exception of the anarchist reference.
I am merely telling the truth. You will never see me reference a Libertarian as a liberal freak, even though we do not agree. I generally do not refer to Libertarians as conservatives either, although most do seem to lean in that direction (as do anarchists).
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1brownsfan
It's really quite simple for me. Adhere to the US Constitution, enforce the laws you already have, stop making unnecessary laws (more gun control for example) when you can't enforce the ones already on the books, and repeal unnecessary and unconstitutional laws.
I am all for adhering to the US Constitution and enforcing the laws, which is more than can be said about any liberal freak, but I do not agree on what you define as "unnecessary" or "unconstitutional."
Correction: I use to be in favor of adhering to the US Constitution and enforcing the laws. Obama has changed my mind. Now I will only vote for politicians who are hell-bent on revenge against liberal freaks. If that revenge entails violating the US Constitution and any law, like Obama has already done, then so be it.
I am merely telling the truth. You will never see me reference a Libertarian as a liberal freak, even though we do not agree. I generally do not refer to Libertarians as conservatives either, although most do seem to lean in that direction (as do anarchists).
I am all for adhering to the US Constitution and enforcing the laws, which is more than can be said about any liberal freak, but I do not agree on what you define as "unnecessary" or "unconstitutional."
We'll agree to disagree on that aspect.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's really quite simple for me. Adhere to the US Constitution, enforce the laws you already have, stop making unnecessary laws (more gun control for example) when you can't enforce the ones already on the books, and repeal unnecessary and unconstitutional laws.
