Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-28-2014, 01:53 AM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,639,390 times
Reputation: 17966

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConeyGirl52 View Post
For those states, that basicly said they were seceeding specificly for slavery - they were speaking as any state would, to the needs of their individual big business in those states. Wealthy people had made substancial investments in many cases. Plantation owners had an investment at stake - some of which owned hundreds, if not thousands of acres.

The bulk of the white population could not afford to buy people. Didnt matter what state their regiment was from, Mother's were not sending their husbands and sons to fight so some rich guy could keep his slaves. Lets be sensible. Mountain folk are not known for having an abundance of slaves that they owned, but they still went and fought.
Most of them went and fought for the same reasons that every soldier in every war in the history of mankind has gone and fought - because their country (or in this case, their state) had declared war and they wanted to defend it, or simply because they were drafted and had no choice. Only about 5% of the German people belonged to the Nazi Party, but 20,000,000 Germans wore the uniform during World War II. Regardless off whether they believed in the Nazi cause, their country was at war, so they fought.

And in the case of the American Civil War, Confederate soldiers fought because their states were at war with the Union. And the reason their states were at war - the reason their states started the Civil War - was because of slavery, and their governments openly admitted it at the time that they seceded from the Union. Regardless of the personal motivations or beliefs of the individual soldiers (or the reasons the Southern states chose to go to war over slavery), the fact remains that the Confederacy started the Civil War to defend the institution of slavery - pure and simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2014, 05:04 AM
 
Location: Subconscious Syncope, USA (Northeastern US)
2,365 posts, read 2,151,645 times
Reputation: 3814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert_The_Crocodile View Post
Most of them went and fought for the same reasons that every soldier in every war in the history of mankind has gone and fought - because their country (or in this case, their state) had declared war and they wanted to defend it, or simply because they were drafted and had no choice. Only about 5% of the German people belonged to the Nazi Party, but 20,000,000 Germans wore the uniform during World War II. Regardless off whether they believed in the Nazi cause, their country was at war, so they fought.

And in the case of the American Civil War, Confederate soldiers fought because their states were at war with the Union. And the reason their states were at war - the reason their states started the Civil War - was because of slavery, and their governments openly admitted it at the time that they seceded from the Union. Regardless of the personal motivations or beliefs of the individual soldiers (or the reasons the Southern states chose to go to war over slavery), the fact remains that the Confederacy started the Civil War to defend the institution of slavery - pure and simple.
I dont know, I wasnt there, but it really doesnt make sense that the South started the War. The South was for the most part the states that were leaving the Union. The Union obviously wanted to stay a Union. It makes sense that a War would commence over that.

Even Black Scholars criticize Lincoln for not making Slavery an official part of the War until he made his Emmancipation Proclamation, which was 2 full years into the War. Two years into the war the North needed both a good moral cause to continue the massive bloody battle, and money from Europe.

Can you imagine any regiment of black soldiers not simply taking their guns running screaming and crying into the arms of any Yankee soldiers they saw? Once anyone is on a battlefield, and in a position of 'every man for himself', what compells them to stay? Wouldnt it just be a matter of crossing North of the Mason-Dixon line at an opportune moment and making a left turn to the West to seek Freedom? Why would the freedom-seeking North still keep and honor the Fugitive Slave Act?

By the following account, it would seem your theory is correct - except that a rebel attack happened in South Carolina on a Fort, and not DC proper. Which makes sense that it would be South Carolina, given its history with The Slave Trade in general.

"On April 10, 1861, knowing that resupplies were on their way from the North to the federal garrison at Fort Sumter in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina, provisional Confederate forces in the city demanded the fort’s surrender. The fort’s commander, Major Robert Anderson, refused. On April 12, the Confederates opened fire with cannon.

At 2:30 p.m. the following day, Major Anderson surrendered. On April 15, Lincoln called for 75,000 volunteers to put down the Southern rebellion, a move that prompted Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas and North Carolina to reverse themselves and vote in favor of session. (Most of the western section of Virginia rejected the session vote and broke away, ultimately forming a new, Union-loyal state, West Virginia."

Seems strangely interesting that states like Virginia (the birthplace of everything American - the original colony, with the first permanent English settlement, Jamestown, established in 1607) and North Carolina (the site of a failed Brittish Colony known as The Lost Colony which was founded prior to Jamestown) would wait for that to back out of the Union, if Slavery was such a pressing issue to them.

In the end we can debate Civil War politics, just as scholars do, until the cow's come home. How does that take away from the fact that black Americans fought and died for that flag? Why would anyone want to dishonor them and their families, and demean their contribution to American History by banning that flag - as well as attempting to erase their existance altogether?


Disclaimer: When I speak, I only represent myself.

Last edited by ConeyGirl52; 08-28-2014 at 06:05 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 05:08 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,056,245 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosie_hair View Post
I don't get it. Where is the conservative outrage comparing taking down the confed flag to genocide and how Obama singlehandedly caused the civil war?
They can only take it down at government buildings. My question is, "Were there really any government buildings flying the confederate flag or is this issue just for show?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 05:34 AM
 
Location: Subconscious Syncope, USA (Northeastern US)
2,365 posts, read 2,151,645 times
Reputation: 3814
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
They can only take it down at government buildings. My question is, "Were there really any government buildings flying the confederate flag or is this issue just for show?"
That's a good question - but does it matter? What matters is the law sets a precedent for the removal of other Civil War flags in other states. Its not just for show. There is certainly a political reason behind it, that could be much larger than the State of California in and of itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 10:17 AM
 
46,987 posts, read 26,047,970 times
Reputation: 29471
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
They can only take it down at government buildings. My question is, "Were there really any government buildings flying the confederate flag or is this issue just for show?"
There were confederate flag items being sold at the California State Fair, which is an event governed by the state. Doesn't anyone read the links?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 10:19 AM
 
46,987 posts, read 26,047,970 times
Reputation: 29471
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConeyGirl52 View Post
That's a good question - but does it matter? What matters is the law sets a precedent for the removal of other Civil War flags in other states.
Surely state governments have the right to legislate which symbols they themselves use or promulgate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 10:32 AM
 
46,987 posts, read 26,047,970 times
Reputation: 29471
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConeyGirl52 View Post
Didnt matter what state their regiment was from, Mother's were not sending their husbands and sons to fight so some rich guy could keep his slaves.
Those in power sent those without power off to fight by appealing to their patriotism or whatever, that is how it always works. Those who engineer the war don't necessarily share the motivations of those who fight it, and that's by design.

Quote:
If you really what a mind-blower, Google Black Confederate Soldiers. There are plenty of images of them. What were they fighting for? An armed black slave in the South? How could it possibly be?
Images are one thing, numbers are another. It wasn't until 1865 that the CSA armed forces officially tried to integrate black soldiers into their ranks.

Confederate Law authorizing the enlistment of black soldiers, March 13, 1865, as promulgated in a military order

Lots of CSA officers would of course bring their black manservants etc. with them, but the number of black armed soldiers was very, very low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Inland FL
2,534 posts, read 1,871,071 times
Reputation: 4234
The Confederate flag is a symbol of southern heritage and states rights. If anyone is going to be offended by the rebel flag, then that is their problem, not mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 09:48 AM
 
46,987 posts, read 26,047,970 times
Reputation: 29471
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridarebel View Post
The Confederate flag is a symbol of southern heritage and states rights.
Yes, states' rights to uphold slavery, we already covered that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 09:51 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,564,350 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
Good news for the great state of California. We don't put up with this nonsense around here...




Confederate Flag Doesn't Fly With California Lawmakers
But of course the Mexican flag is alright...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top