Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:10 AM
 
79,910 posts, read 44,427,722 times
Reputation: 17214

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
"Debunked" religion? Which one is that?

And which science do you believe in? The one today, the one of 100 years ago, or the one 100 years from today, because they are all different. Which one is the "truth" you put your faith in?
Exactly. 15 years ago we had 10 years to take drastic actions or face devastating repercussions. Seems it never happened. Seems what happened was fudged figures and flawed models. There is nothing we can change by carbon credits or cap and trade scheme's.

 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Long Island
87 posts, read 90,869 times
Reputation: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Exactly.

Notice the the "controversy" over the data held in East Anglia has evaporated and the next controversy is Australia. What we don't have are scientific studies that demonstrate the anthropogentic climate change is not happening.


The Koch brothers are leading the ignorant sheeple down a garden path again.
Id say the Koch Brothers are leading them all of us over a cliff so that they can make a few extra millions!
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:12 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,302 posts, read 20,827,912 times
Reputation: 9345
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Please post some science that demonstrates anthropogentic climate change isn't happening. All I see are sensational stories by RW news blogs -- Briebart? Really?
Please post some science that demonstrates anthropogentic climate change is happening. PROOF, not conjecture.
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:12 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,496,793 times
Reputation: 4245
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Proof is the province of obscure mathematical theorems. Science uses hypothesis testing. That is as complete as it can be at this point and the science is accepted by the entire scientific community. Let me quote AAAS, the leading scientific professional organization in the United States.

The overwhelming evidence of human-caused climate change documents both current impacts with significant costs and extraordinary future risks to society and natural systems. The scientific community has convened conferences, published reports, spoken out at forums and proclaimed, through statements by virtually every national scientific academy and relevant major scientific organization — including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) — that climate change puts the well-being of people of all nations at risk.

Surveys show that many Americans think climate change is still a topic of significant scientific disagreement. Thus, it is important and increasingly urgent for the public to know there is now a high degree of agreement among climate scientists that human-caused climate change is real. Moreover, while the public is becoming aware that climate change is increasing the likelihood of certain local disasters, many people do not yet understand that there is a small, but real chance of abrupt, unpredictable and potentially irreversible changes with highly damaging impacts on people in the United States and around the world.


__________________________________________________ _______________________________________

Climate scientists agree: climate change is happening here and now. Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening. This agreement is documented not just by a single study, but by a converging stream of evidence over the past two decades from surveys of scientists, content analyses of peer-reviewed studies, and public statements issued by virtually every membership organization of experts in this field. Average global temperature has increased by about 1.4˚ F over the last 100 years. Sea level is rising, and some types of extreme events – such as heat waves and heavy precipitation events – are happening more frequently. Recent scientific findings indicate that climate change is likely responsible for the increase in the intensity of many of these events in recent years.
It's NOT accepted by the ENTIRE scientific community and ALL models have NEVER been right. EVER!
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:16 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 8,034,820 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Take your fingers out of your eyes.
Gladly, post a peer reviewed scietific study for me to read. Briebart fall well short of credible.
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:22 AM
 
79,910 posts, read 44,427,722 times
Reputation: 17214
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Gladly, post a peer reviewed scietific study for me to read. Briebart fall well short of credible.
As I said. The numbers from the actual study was posted. You never bothered to look did you?
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:23 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 8,034,820 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
It's NOT accepted by the ENTIRE scientific community and ALL models have NEVER been right. EVER!
I hope no science is ever accepted by the ENTIRE scientific community. We always want people working on other theories. That's how science advances. The question is how much consensus is required before we develop policies to deal with our best understanding of the problem. We have more than enough.

Fortunately you "deniers" are busy looking for data inconsistencies while we "believers" are busy writing law and regulation to mitigate AGW. The "AGW isn't happening" train left to station about a decade ago. We are phasing out coal-fire generation plants, reducing gasoline consumption, and the most exciting automobile to come along is decades is electric powered.

Keep debating. We will keep regulating.
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:25 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 8,034,820 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
As I said. The numbers from the actual study was posted. You never bothered to look did you?
There was no peer reviewed study.
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:41 AM
 
2,777 posts, read 1,790,880 times
Reputation: 2418
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Exactly. 15 years ago we had 10 years to take drastic actions or face devastating repercussions. Seems it never happened. Seems what happened was fudged figures and flawed models. There is nothing we can change by carbon credits or cap and trade scheme's.
Even if this were true (which it isn't, at least not for the majority), then being wrong once doesn't mean that you are going to be wrong forever. It's like saying that airplanes couldn't possibly exist because in the 7th century someone died trying to fly by making giant wings out of bearskin.

Your argument is fallacious.
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Where you aren't
1,245 posts, read 926,975 times
Reputation: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
I hope no science is ever accepted by the ENTIRE scientific community. We always want people working on other theories. That's how science advances. The question is how much consensus is required before we develop policies to deal with our best understanding of the problem. We have more than enough.

Fortunately you "deniers" are busy looking for data inconsistencies while we "believers" are busy writing law and regulation to mitigate AGW. The "AGW isn't happening" train left to station about a decade ago. We are phasing out coal-fire generation plants, reducing gasoline consumption, and the most exciting automobile to come along is decades is electric powered.

Keep debating. We will keep regulating.
How are people going to afford to charge those so called electric cars when the electricity costs skyrocket, and we end up with rolling blackouts due to AGW conspiracy theorists non existent thinking? Keep regulating, and businesses will go out of business, and or move some where its affordable to do business.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top