Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-18-2014, 03:16 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,049,136 times
Reputation: 10270

Advertisements

Still waiting for the rollback of welfare and food stamps.

 
Old 09-18-2014, 03:19 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6033
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
Still waiting for the rollback of welfare and food stamps.
so am I.

I would be nice for both sides to work together on that instead of one side trying to demonize anyone who needs those programs.
 
Old 09-18-2014, 03:27 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Gee, and to think I used to trust Forbes, and now I find it is just another Left Wing rag.
 
Old 09-18-2014, 05:58 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
This is again a false argument, births exceed job age. The population adding 13 million people doesnt mean we need 13 million more jobs.

in 1995( those turning 18 last year), there were 3.892 million people born, All those people wont go immediately into the job market. Many will go to college(66% of high school grads go to college), but in bigger contrast, there were 3.957 births in 2013


then there is the fact that old people retire from their jobs or step down to part time.

in 1943( these people turned 66 in 2009), 3.102 million people turned old enough to retire, 2.939 million in 2010, 2.858 in 2011, 3.411 in 2012, 3.817 in 2013, and 3.637 in this coming year.

My argument is simply, that the ratio of births to jobs needed is not 1:1 as you were claiming.

Never mind the fact that this entire post is you attacking President Obama for a recession that started before he even took office.
Should we compare the number of people on welfare now vs then?

if those jobs arent needed, there would be less people on welfare, not more, and someone has to pay for them.
 
Old 09-18-2014, 06:05 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed from California View Post
An opinion piece by an obambot and a complete sham with interpreting the stats.

I expect 100+ posts from bots saying how great we're doing under jugears.
So true!
 
Old 09-18-2014, 06:08 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fancy-Schmancy View Post
Good news for the nation...so of course the conservatives are trying desperately to find some reason not to believe it. 'You can't trust the numbers!' usually right around the time they've quoted some number that seems to support their argument (like all the people who've dropped out of the work force -- that's a gov't sourced number too). Or 'the source is a liberal liar' -- they never argue *facts*.

The facts are that every economic indicator is improving. Unemployment -- like it or not -- is just 6.1% nation wide. Car dealers had their best August in 11 years. Consumer confidence is up. Exports are up. The deficit is down and dropping. More Americans have health care/insurance. Crime is down.

Just roll with it, guys. Sooner or later things will start to sink again and then you can be happy again.
You're really amusing. You always make me laugh.
 
Old 09-18-2014, 06:08 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,196,724 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by sxrckr View Post
I was wondering the same thing.

Anyway, you need to learn:
Positive developments = result of Obama
Negative developments = Bush's fault
I blame it on Woodrow Wilson who signed the Federal Reserve into being in 1913. All down hill from there.
 
Old 09-18-2014, 06:19 AM
 
Location: Hyrule
8,390 posts, read 11,603,621 times
Reputation: 7544
He's only going down in history to me for being the ass who forces people making 50 thou a year to pay 800 to 1000 a month for a family of 3 to have insurance or get fined. It's ridiculous. You can't even get a good cash price at the doctors anymore, and the expensive plans pay for nothing. OBAMA is taking a sledge hammer to the middle class.

He gained votes for promising what he couldn't deliver just like the rest of them. Then after in office shook hands with insurance corps and mandated their bs.

When I hear Obamas name I only think of my regret for voting for him. I was wrong he wasn't the less of two evils, paying for that mistake now. Sucks.
 
Old 09-18-2014, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
This is again a false argument, births exceed job age. The population adding 13 million people doesnt mean we need 13 million more jobs.

in 1995( those turning 18 last year), there were 3.892 million people born, All those people wont go immediately into the job market. Many will go to college(66% of high school grads go to college), but in bigger contrast, there were 3.957 births in 2013


then there is the fact that old people retire from their jobs or step down to part time.

in 1943( these people turned 66 in 2009), 3.102 million people turned old enough to retire, 2.939 million in 2010, 2.858 in 2011, 3.411 in 2012, 3.817 in 2013, and 3.637 in this coming year.

My argument is simply, that the ratio of births to jobs needed is not 1:1 as you were claiming.

Never mind the fact that this entire post is you attacking President Obama for a recession that started before he even took office.
wow apparently you never finished 5th grade, or you just cant read

population (not just births) GREW by 13 million in the last 5 years

number of jobs created in those 5 years LESS THAN 3 Million

number of PEOPLE working full time jobs...8 MILLION LESS than 5 years ago


EVERY DAY 6000 people turn 65 in the usa
EVERY DAY 13,000 people turn 18 in the usa


even a 5th grader could see the math... too bad you cant
 
Old 09-18-2014, 08:03 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,935,949 times
Reputation: 5932
Interesting to see the same RWNJ's attack the source and on other threads scream at others to not do so and address what is in article.

Nope no Double Standard on the right is there?

ROTFLMAO!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top