Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The three west coast states follow the same pattern--blue in the big cities, and red in the sticks. WA is supposedly the bluest, yet we have a race in the 4th CD where two republicans will face off in Nov to decide who represents the district. Democrats Positioned to Elect Republicans Clint Didier or Dan Newhouse
But this is more than offset by Seattle, where if a liberal democrat is challenged, it is from the left by a socialist or Green Partier.
No, it isn't like that at all. It's hypocritical to simultaneously bash the Republican Party as being for greedy rich people while ridiculing Republican states for being poor. It is not hypocritical to bash people scamming the welfare system while living in a state that receives more federal aid, as long as you yourself are not on welfare. That's comparing someone's ideas to another person's place of residence. Completely failed analogy.
If it was not for the double-standard hypocrisy of Democrats, they would have no standards at all.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,557 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2
No, it isn't like that at all. It's hypocritical to simultaneously bash the Republican Party as being for greedy rich people while ridiculing Republican states for being poor. It is not hypocritical to bash people scamming the welfare system while living in a state that receives more federal aid, as long as you yourself are not on welfare. That's comparing someone's ideas to another person's place of residence. Completely failed analogy.
your analogy is a failure as well.
Democrats arent ridiculing republicans for being poor, but simply pointing out that your parties policies do not create the prosperity that you claim it would.
No, it isn't like that at all. It's hypocritical to simultaneously bash the Republican Party as being for greedy rich people while ridiculing Republican states for being poor. It is not hypocritical to bash people scamming the welfare system while living in a state that receives more federal aid, as long as you yourself are not on welfare. That's comparing someone's ideas to another person's place of residence. Completely failed analogy.
However you want to justify that hypocrisy is fine with me.
Im sorry,Did Feinsteins bill even make it out of committee ?
The fact that both Feinstein and Schumer introduced bills to ban all firearms is proof that Marxist fascists, a.k.a. the Democratic Party, do indeed want to ban all firearms. Nobody is buying your deliberate lie: "But that doesnt mean we want to take everyone guns away."
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,557 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch
The fact that both Feinstein and Schumer introduced bills to ban all firearms is proof that Marxist fascists, a.k.a. the Democratic Party, do indeed want to ban all firearms. Nobody is buying your deliberate lie: "But that doesnt mean we want to take everyone guns away."
Their bills banned ALL firearms ????
im going to give you a chance to retract that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
