New scientific paper links climate to sun, not carbon (claims, tax, best)

[jimhcom]

New paper finds strong evidence the Sun has controlled climate over the past 11,000 years, not CO2 | Principia Scientific Intl

As rational people have been saying for some time, climate change is dictated by changes in the sun and not in CO2.

[Ed from California]

Yes but one can't tax the sun.

[Goinback2011]

The warmers don't like to talk about the giant nuclear fireball or about the evidence for warm/cool era oscillation during the Holocene.

[Fifty Seven]

Has this paper been peer reviewed?

[Fifty Seven]

Originally Posted by Goinback2011

The warmers don't like to talk about the giant nuclear fireball or about the evidence for warm/cool era oscillation during the Holocene.

I remember a few years ago hearing a report about how the temps were changing on Mars and other planets in a pattern than resembled climate shifts here on Earth. I also remember asking how that could be if our climate shifts were due to human activity(how many SUV's are on Mars, anyway?), and getting plenty of insults and labels(denier, etc.) in response but not much in the way of rebuttals.

[DCforever]

Oh My God, the Tea Baggers have discovered that the Sun is a factor in the Earth's global temperature. Next study: The Sun provides Light!

[DCforever]

Originally Posted by Uncle Bully

I remember a few years ago hearing a report about how the temps were changing on Mars and other planets in a pattern than resembled climate shifts here on Earth. I also remember asking how that could be if our climate shifts were due to human activity(how many SUV's are on Mars, anyway?), and getting plenty of insults and labels(denier, etc.) in response but not much in the way of rebuttals.

You should check into these guys they can help your memory.

[Fifty Seven]

Originally Posted by DCforever

You should check into these guys they can help your memory.

I also remember most of the insults being rather condescending and tasteless, like this one.

[DCforever]

Originally Posted by Uncle Bully

I also remember most of the insults being rather condescending and tasteless, like this one.

Good to see your mind has moments of clarity.

[Seabass Inna Bun]

I read the article. At the bottom it links to a right-wing denialist site call "hockeyshtick". This is not science. There's no science here.

I'm sure that if the denialists ever post something of actual scientific merit, it will show up in the scientific publications. This is why they never, ever post anything from scientific publications; their claims have no scientific merit.

Better luck next time, denialists.