Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-04-2015, 12:52 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 19 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,549 posts, read 16,533,663 times
Reputation: 6032

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
uhm... congress is made up of two houses... house of reps, and the house of the senate

dems controlled the senate 2001, 2006 through present
He was obviously talking about the House of Represenatives, which Republicans have controlled for 10 of the last 14.

Democrats also only controlled the senate in 2001 because 1 republican resigned, it was a 50 to 49 split. Not real control by any means.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-04-2015, 01:41 PM
 
26,480 posts, read 15,060,677 times
Reputation: 14631
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
See, you are presenting multuple problems here.

1. We arent arguing the same thing.

Im talking about what Cheney meant, not what O'Neil meant. Cheney was responding to the electoral and short term ramifications of deficits.

There is no dance going on. Im debating in good faith where as you ( demonstrated below with your "you think its ok for Obama to lie" comment) are just arguing for the sake of attacking Democrats.
Because you are choosing to be narrow sighted on purpose to defend your original fictitious point.

Paul O'Neil said Large Deficits matter, because they in the long run are creating unsustainable interest payments from a large debt. Cheney said deficits don't matter and dismissed the entire point that O'Neil made including a large national debt making a Fiscal Crisis loom on the horizon. Deficits and Debt are connected at the hip - especially with the point being made by O'Neil and dismissed by Cheney. According to Paul O'Neill who Cheney's quote comes from - Cheney dismissed the large national debt itself and the increasing interest payments.

You have never argued in good faith - you always spin for Obama. You point blank lied to me in the past about a politifact link to defend Obama. Your premise is Obama uber alles and then you *** saw your position from there.





Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Im arguing that the world is black and white by saying it isnt black and white ????????????????????
You told me that Obama was one in the same...no...you are looking at the world with a very simplistic mind...there are shades of gray.

Candidate Obama Version 2008 =/= President Obama Version 2014.





Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Nope, we are debating specific facets of an argument.

If you are going to debate total deficits and not budget deficits, then you should be comparing total deficits of every year and not just budget deficits on the Bush years to total deficits of the Obama years.

You are the one who is distorting, you do the exact same thing when you argue the unemployment rate and you compare the "real" unemployment rate(U6) of the Obama years to the Official unemployment rate(U3) of the Bush years instead of comparing u6 to u6 or u3 to u3.

[

again, its fine if you want to make that argument, but you need to do it from both sides and at a time when we are actually comparing the 2.
You are the one distorting.

I am the one using consistently REAL DEFICITS ACCRUED in reality.

You are the one pushing the false narrative that Bush inherited a surplus - when you know it was a projected surplus that didn't pan out - you are lying.



Bottomline....

Fiscal Year 2014 saw a $1.1 Trillion dollar real deficit...as candidate Obama version 2008 said you can't use CRs to hide spending like Bush.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2015, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,608,156 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post

Bottomline....

Fiscal Year 2014 saw a $1.1 Trillion dollar real deficit...as candidate Obama version 2008 said you can't use CRs to hide spending like Bush.
Can you post your definition of deficit?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2015, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,475,534 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Can you post your definition of deficit?
the end result when all the +'s and -'s are counted for the fy...(the projected revenue vs the actual revenue vs the projected spending vs the actual spending)

fy 14 had a deficit of almost 1.1 trillion (1.07 trillion to be exact)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2015, 02:41 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,541,469 times
Reputation: 6392
The .gov mobsters will keep up their couterfeiting operation as long as possible. Prepare accordingly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2015, 03:36 PM
 
4,983 posts, read 3,289,843 times
Reputation: 2739
But we have record tax collection. This doesn't compute!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2015, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,167,905 times
Reputation: 7875
Thanks for the update, I was wondering what the year end numbers were for the national debt....though not really anything to act like the roof is on fire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2015, 03:43 PM
 
4,534 posts, read 4,928,619 times
Reputation: 6327
Funny how war(s) is (are) expensive, ain't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2015, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,608,156 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
the end result when all the +'s and -'s are counted for the fy...(the projected revenue vs the actual revenue vs the projected spending vs the actual spending)

fy 14 had a deficit of almost 1.1 trillion (1.07 trillion to be exact)
Projected? How about actual?

Actual total revenue was 5.7 trillion, and total expenses were 6.1.

Federal revenue was 3.0 and federal expenses were 3.5.

Where do you get 1.1 trillion difference? You are looking at numbers, and you do not understand what they mean.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2015, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,167,905 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by fibonacci View Post
Funny how war(s) is (are) expensive, ain't it?
When you put them on the company credit card, they are basically free until the bill is due.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top