Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-03-2015, 03:26 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,643,046 times
Reputation: 22232

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Rothstein View Post
That's because the politicians are bought and paid for by the .5%.
Actually, it's because many politicians have sold the public down the river. Instead of holding those politicians accountable, people tend to lash out at those who are able to influence the office holders.

Since way too many voters are cheerleaders for their political "team", they don't want to hold politicians accountable, because that would mean "betraying" the players on their team.

 
Old 02-03-2015, 05:14 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,067 posts, read 44,906,239 times
Reputation: 13720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francois View Post
Mostly, people area just fed up with all of the tax breaks going to those who need it the LEAST
If they're supposedly getting so many tax breaks, why is the share of the federal income tax revenue they pay about twice that of their share of the income? Meanwhile, the middle class (top 25-50%) pays only half their share (compared to their share of the income).

It's all here in Table 1:
Summary of Latest Federal Income Tax Data
 
Old 02-03-2015, 06:18 PM
 
325 posts, read 256,073 times
Reputation: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
If they're supposedly getting so many tax breaks, why is the share of the federal income tax revenue they pay about twice that of their share of the income? Meanwhile, the middle class (top 25-50%) pays only half their share (compared to their share of the income).

It's all here in Table 1:
Summary of Latest Federal Income Tax Data
More spin, trying to elicit an emotional response. Is anyone other than me disturbed by the fact that 50% of the American population earned less than 37,000? And most of those filings will be for FAMILIES!
When the hell did 50k household income become rich?
I'm going to compare that adjusted for inflation with the equivalent buying power in the 50's and see how the percentages line up.
 
Old 02-03-2015, 06:22 PM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,388,256 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Maleman View Post
More spin, trying to elicit an emotional response. Is anyone other than me disturbed by the fact that 50% of the American population earned less than 37,000? And most of those filings will be for FAMILIES!
When the hell did 50k household income become rich?
I'm going to compare that adjusted for inflation with the equivalent buying power in the 50's and see how the percentages line up.
He forgets the payroll tax quite conveniently. The top doesn't pay that one.
 
Old 02-03-2015, 06:32 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,067 posts, read 44,906,239 times
Reputation: 13720
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Maleman View Post
When the hell did 50k household income become rich?
$50k is middle class. And the middle class is only paying 1/2 their share of the federal income tax revenue (based on their share of the income), while the top 1% is paying twice as much as they should. So how is paying twice what one should (again, based on income share), a tax break?
 
Old 02-03-2015, 06:38 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,067 posts, read 44,906,239 times
Reputation: 13720
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
He forgets the payroll tax quite conveniently. The top doesn't pay that one.
Indeed, they do. Two liberal think tanks have calculated the average total effective federal tax rates for each income group. Here are the effective federal tax rates they pay:




Permission to share granted here: File:US federal effective tax rates by income percentile and component.gif - Wikimedia Commons

Data source: Average Effective Federal Tax Rates

" *Individual income tax rates for the lowest and second lowest quintiles are negative and are netted against the payroll tax rate. A quintile is one fifth of the population. Calculations assume that employees also pay the employer portion of payroll taxes in the form of reduced wages. The breaks are (in 2013 dollars): 20% $24,191; 40% $47,261; 60% $79,521; 80% $134,266; 90% $180,482; 95% $261,471; 99% $615,048; 99.9% $3,170,865."
 
Old 02-03-2015, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,220,022 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandyJet View Post
Middle class made bad life choices and rather than admit they are dumb or lazy or both they project their problems on to the 1%

Lets start out by stating a very simple truth, there wouldn't be rich people without government.

A second truth, is that corporations and the financial industry are also a product of government. Corporations are a legal entity, protected by government, and granted a number of privileges. And the financial industry is a combination of these same corporate protections, mixed with the privileges granted by central banks.


Those who have become wealthy are not people who on their own are necessarily any more virtuous or hard-working than anyone else. They are just the people who have best learned how to take advantage of an economic system created and perpetuated through government force.


There is this notion that members of the 1% are just more hardworking than the average American. But is this actually true?


Lets imagine a world populated only of the 1%. How much work would even be getting done? What kind of material standard of living would such a world have? Aren't the 1% at best only the managers of other people's labor, and at worst, usurers who have learned how to game the system to their advantage?

Isn't the goal of all financiers, and for that matter investors, and even individuals with their savings, to "live off the interest" of their money. Effectively, to live perpetually off the labor of others.


The only class of people who could manage just as well or better on their own, would be what I would call "the working classes". Coincidentally, this is also the group of people who are most generous with their money.

Wealthy Have Gotten Less Generous As Poor Give More To Charity


The rich tend to be liars and cheats, who lack empathy for other people's problems, and have an unhealthy obsession with money and power. They tend to behave unethically/immorally, and even worse, they are the most influential people in the culture of this country. They are even held up as an example of what we should all emulate.

Rich People More Likely to Lie, Cheat, Study Suggests | Socioeconomic Status & Unethical Behaviors | Warren Buffett & Bill Gates

Are Rich People Unethical? - ABC News


It is sad and disgusting.

Last edited by Redshadowz; 02-03-2015 at 07:34 PM..
 
Old 02-03-2015, 07:21 PM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,388,256 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Indeed, they do. Two liberal think tanks have calculated the average total effective federal tax rates for each income group. Here are the effective federal tax rates they pay:




Permission to share granted here: File:US federal effective tax rates by income percentile and component.gif - Wikimedia Commons

Data source: Average Effective Federal Tax Rates

" *Individual income tax rates for the lowest and second lowest quintiles are negative and are netted against the payroll tax rate. A quintile is one fifth of the population. Calculations assume that employees also pay the employer portion of payroll taxes in the form of reduced wages. The breaks are (in 2013 dollars): 20% $24,191; 40% $47,261; 60% $79,521; 80% $134,266; 90% $180,482; 95% $261,471; 99% $615,048; 99.9% $3,170,865."
Where does it show capital gains?
 
Old 02-03-2015, 07:26 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,397,951 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
Where does it show capital gains?
But...thats not income, didnt you know?

Sigh. Tell you what, the rich could pay ALL of the taxes, and as long as they get massive returns they wont care. They've seen their income literally double recently.....

Tell you what, double my income, and double my taxes and I'd still be happy. Doubling my income while people treat the idea of me paying more as affront to humanity and I'd be laughing my tush off.
 
Old 02-03-2015, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,220,022 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
$50k is middle class. And the middle class is only paying 1/2 their share of the federal income tax revenue (based on their share of the income), while the top 1% is paying twice as much as they should. So how is paying twice what one should (again, based on income share), a tax break?

Let me start out by stating, I really hate people complaining about tax rates in a way that basically paints a picture that the spectrum of incomes are the natural outcome of market economics.

In reality, all incomes are manipulated either up or down as a result of government intervention.


Furthermore, governments regularly make many businesses artificially profitable for the sake of international competitiveness(IE subsidies/protections), or even as a result of things like "licensing" and other regulations which reduce competition.


Look at it like this, if it wasn't for licensing, Doctors wouldn't be paid nearly as well as they are now. The same goes for electricians and plumbers. For that matter, the insurance industry would be a tiny shell of its current self without government insurance mandates. Anything considered a utility is a "government-regulated monopoly for private profit".


My friend used to say "No one actually knows how much a loaf of bread costs. All the ingredients that go into a loaf of bread are subsidized and/or regulated by the government".



With that said, I am a massive fan of the free market. In fact, you could just as well call me an anarcho-capitalist(IE Murray Rothbard).


But since the vast majority of the wealth created every year in this country is the result of government involvement in the market. And since this is especially true the higher someone's income. It simply isn't very useful to talk about what the appropriate tax rates are for different income brackets. I mean, it is impossible to know what a fair tax system is, in an economy which is completely manipulated from top to bottom.

Last edited by Redshadowz; 02-03-2015 at 08:05 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top