Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2015, 09:46 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17865

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorc140 View Post
How does that change the fact that Alaska has one of the highest rates of gun violence in the nation. Gun violence includes people who are shot, but survive due to medical care, and therefore cannot be counted in the murder rate. Once you include all shootings, Alaska is much less safe than Washington DC or Chicago
Citation?

 
Old 04-03-2015, 09:49 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17865
That has absolutely nothing to do with what you said.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
5,940 posts, read 3,572,239 times
Reputation: 5651
Brady Campaign? They are about as much of an authority on guns as FOX is for news. You can tell when they are lying. Their lips move.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 09:51 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,085,057 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weichert View Post
You will note (or should) that I've not mentioned owning some kind of weapon.

The problem that I have is people carrying them where ever they go. That is absolute nonsense.

Like I previously wrote, there is a time and a place for everything.
People that legally carry with CCWs, rarely have their licenses revoked because they have committed a crime.
We have been photoed, fingerprinted, passed FBI background checks, paid the fees, passed firearm proficiency tests. We have been found 13 times less likely to break the law. We make personal safety our responsibility. In the past 3 years we have grown to over 11 million from 8 million CCW licensees.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 09:53 PM
 
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
5,940 posts, read 3,572,239 times
Reputation: 5651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorc140 View Post
It shows how the states with looser gun laws have the most gun violence

Maybe no one should feed the Trolls. He will get tired of posting to himself. If this was a serious discussion it would be different.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 09:55 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorc140 View Post
It shows how the states with looser gun laws have the most gun violence
It does not attempt to connect the dots son, it arbitrarily scores a state based on their existing gun laws for whatever criteria they consider relevant. For example thy have Montana listed as F, they have one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the country. Despite this they also have one the lowest rates of murder by firearm. Why would give them a F? LOL
 
Old 04-03-2015, 09:56 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,085,057 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorc140 View Post
Nope, fix the gun problem, and fix the murder problem
Remove the guns from the ghettos and see if the huge murder per capita goes down. No reason to remove guns from the rest of the country that has a low murder per capita. Let's see how successful you can be at removing these illegal guns in the inner cities.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 09:59 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,085,057 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris347 View Post
Maybe no one should feed the Trolls. He will get tired of posting to himself. If this was a serious discussion it would be different.
I know you're right. He is new to the forum today and already has exposed his agenda with over 60 posts already.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 10:00 PM
 
Location: Sale Creek, TN
4,882 posts, read 5,014,802 times
Reputation: 6054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorc140 View Post
2. There are no "innate" rights. Rights are granted to people based off a consensus of their peers and the agreement of the government they elect.
Let us know how this works out for you, when they ban, outlaw or prohibit something legal now, that you support.
 
Old 04-03-2015, 10:07 PM
 
32,070 posts, read 15,062,274 times
Reputation: 13688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlandochuck1 View Post
I know you're right. He is new to the forum today and already has exposed his agenda with over 60 posts already.
So what if they joined today. Are they not allowed to start a thread. And here we have over 250 posts in this thread. So I guess some are enjoying debating this. And you guys posting...don't feed the troll....are just adding to this thread so why comment at all. Seems simple to me, you don't like a thread then don't comment and move on lol
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top