Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-04-2015, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,846,404 times
Reputation: 1438

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
The economy was in freefall because Clinton, on the advice of his financial working group (Summers, Raines, Rubin) deliberately left derivatives unregulated. Repealing Glass-Steagall didn`t help the situation either.

Clinton: I Was Wrong to Listen to Wrong Advice Against Regulating Derivatives* - ABC News


Once the initial crisis was over, why would the economy continue in freefall?

When has that ever happened?

The fact that this is the weakest recovery from recession in our history speaks to the failed policies of the Obama administration.
Who in the Bush Administration was pushing for regulating derivatives between Jan 2001 and 2007/8 when the market for derivatives was growing dramatically?

Certainly not Treasury Sec. Hank Paulson who was in charge at Goldman Sachs when Goldman became a major players in the derivative marketplace.

Summers and Rubin were not alone in resisting regulation of derivatives, it was a bi-partisan position.

Why would the economy continue to freefall? Because the investment banks which are a driving force in a capitalist economy had been devastated. I'm frankly amazed that the US has done as well as it has given the circumstances of late 2008.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-05-2015, 12:20 AM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,937,526 times
Reputation: 3416
Americans have a very short memory and have never learned actual history.... The worst president in US history is Lyndon Baines Johnson. He escalated the vietnam war, and is the father of the modern social services network. He has cost this country more in actual lost productivity, and revenue than any president past or present.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2015, 01:45 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
Who in the Bush Administration was pushing for regulating derivatives between Jan 2001 and 2007/8 when the market for derivatives was growing dramatically?

Certainly not Treasury Sec. Hank Paulson who was in charge at Goldman Sachs when Goldman became a major players in the derivative marketplace.

Summers and Rubin were not alone in resisting regulation of derivatives, it was a bi-partisan position.

Why would the economy continue to freefall? Because the investment banks which are a driving force in a capitalist economy had been devastated. I'm frankly amazed that the US has done as well as it has given the circumstances of late 2008.


I agree Bush could have done more to stop the avalanche Clinton started.

As for those devastated investment banks, they never missed a beat.

As soon as they got their paws on all that TARP money, they did what any soulless reptile would do.

Instead of loaning the money out, like they were supposed to do, they went out and bought up the same assets they made near worthless at fire sale prices.

Nice to have friends with a money printing machine.


As for Sleepy Summers, I know why Brooksley Born`s career at CFTC came to an end.

What I don`t understand is why he was able to find a job that didn`t involve a large broom and an even larger set of keys.

Ditto Paulson and Rubin.


Now, about that ****ty recovery...

Reaganomics Vs. Obamanomics: Facts And Figures - Forbes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2015, 01:49 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,419,527 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
The economy was in freefall because Clinton, on the advice of his financial working group (Summers, Raines, Rubin) deliberately left derivatives unregulated. Repealing Glass-Steagall didn`t help the situation either.

Clinton: I Was Wrong to Listen to Wrong Advice Against Regulating Derivatives* - ABC News


Once the initial crisis was over, why would the economy continue in freefall?

When has that ever happened?

The fact that this is the weakest recovery from recession in our history speaks to the failed policies of the Obama administration.
Are you serious?

The economy lost TRILLIONS in consumer wealth when the financial crisis hit. Foreclosures were rampant, business failures were common, and hundreds of thousands of jobs were being lost every month. The economic contraction was the worst in 80 years. Anyone expecting a quick recovery was delusional.

Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Take it up with Clinton.

His trade deals.

His repeal of Glass-Steagall.

His refusal to regulate derivatives.

Without Clinton, there is no financial crisis.
Conservatives love to site Glass-Steagall as the direct cause o the Great Recession (mainly to deflect blame from Bush onto Clinton) but it's a false narrative. If you tally the institutions that ran into severe problems in 2008-09, the list includes Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, AIG, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, none of which would have under Glass-Steagall’s restrictions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2015, 02:25 AM
 
3,353 posts, read 6,442,185 times
Reputation: 1128
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
I'm by no measure a fan of Bush, but I truly don't believe he could be labelled as the 'worse President.' What did he do to truly drag the country down on purpose?

Let's discuss a few reasons people say Bush is the worst:v

Iraq War, yes, today it's looked at as a major policy failure but with the previous intelligence dating back to Clinton's first term, Iraq had WMD's. Mind you, with 9/11 just happening, the U.S. wasn't going to tolerate any threat. Now on the offense of Bush, why didn't we also attack NK? Maybe China would've stopped us? Regardless, I understand why Iraq happened. It's like someone killing your neighbor and you having no guns in your home, well, of course you'll arm up now to prevent that from happening again.

Tax-Breaks primarily for the wealthy, a lot of people forget there was a recession at the end of Clinton's term so in-turn, the same argument that Obama supporters use can be used for Bush and that's that he inherited a problem. To be fair, regardless of the surpluses were to continue, Bush would still made a tax-cut, but with the economy in 'shambles,' I do understand why he may think tax-cuts would spur growth as in some cases they do.

NCLB-A true policy failure, but I do believe it was made in good-faith.

The Great Recession-while Bush did make attempts while in office to restructure a few organizations that were seeming to bubble, and many conservatives blame Clinton for that, I don't believe Bush would've done anything to truly stop a bubble. In other words, he probably would've removed even more regulations on those organizations but we'll never know, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2015, 04:06 AM
 
26,500 posts, read 15,084,039 times
Reputation: 14655
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Obama must be 2nd worst then.

Obama has doubled down on virtually everything that he complained about Bush for.

Obama is also a pathological liar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2015, 04:33 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
Are you serious?

The economy lost TRILLIONS in consumer wealth when the financial crisis hit. Foreclosures were rampant, business failures were common, and hundreds of thousands of jobs were being lost every month. The economic contraction was the worst in 80 years. Anyone expecting a quick recovery was delusional.



Conservatives love to site Glass-Steagall as the direct cause o the Great Recession (mainly to deflect blame from Bush onto Clinton) but it's a false narrative. If you tally the institutions that ran into severe problems in 2008-09, the list includes Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, AIG, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, none of which would have under Glass-Steagall’s restrictions.


"The economic contraction was the worst in 80 years."




Yeah, I see the ministry of truth has been busy...

"Note: On July 31, 2013 the Bureau of Economic Analysis BEA revised all GDP statistics from 1929. It also made revisions in 2014, back through 1999. The most recent stats are given below, with the original stats in parentheses."

History of U.S. Recessions: Causes, Lengths, Stats


Must nice to be able rewrite the facts to fit the narrative.


OK, so if Clinton never takes the oath of office, never signs NAFTA and the 2000 China Trade Act, never repeals Glass-Steigall, never requires GSEs to bundle mortgages into derivatives, never allows unregulated derivatives to be traded or leveraged, how do we still have a financial crisis like the one we witnessed in 2008?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2015, 07:56 AM
 
2,083 posts, read 1,621,084 times
Reputation: 1406
Obama's approval rating right now is WORSE than Bush:
Poll: More Americans like George W. Bush than dislike - CNNPolitics.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2015, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
George "W" Bush is by far the worst. He was off the charts horrible, and I don't think anyone will ever overtake him as the worst.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2015, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Twin Cities, MN
186 posts, read 158,524 times
Reputation: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
George "W" Bush is by far the worst. He was off the charts horrible, and I don't think anyone will ever overtake him as the worst.

All you have to do is look to your boy in the White House currently and you have your answer. The O-boy blows every other President away in terms of being the worst, wake up and do some research here. Wow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top