Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-01-2015, 05:54 PM
 
7,578 posts, read 5,330,332 times
Reputation: 9447

Advertisements

Apparently from what we are told, the problems encountered where not from an economic source but rather a political backlash from the naughty and greedy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-01-2015, 06:01 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 10,417,672 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juram View Post
Actually its his problem now. When you drive out your top employees, you're going to have issues.

People who worked their butts off, who helped the company grow into what it has become were basically told that their contributions were only as valuable as the guy who walked in through the door last week.
Bingo. The guy was just not thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2015, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
3,515 posts, read 3,689,807 times
Reputation: 6403
Quote:
Originally Posted by pommysmommy View Post
Bingo. The guy was just not thinking.


I think its an awesome idea to better compensate his employees, to see a company treating its employees lije assets rather than liabilities but he screwed up in creating this $70k barrier.

Better off would have been a sliding scale dependent on experience and performance. Give everyone a raise but make sure that your longest-tenured, most valuable employes get compensated in recognition of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2015, 06:07 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,881,487 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juram View Post
I think the issue is that if youre working your ass off, never miss work, pass up on vacations and youre a quite valuable asset to the company, having some slacker who spends half his day picking his nose earning the same thing is pretty much a slap in the face, its like the company said "thanks for the hard work, **** you!"
That's just an assumption. Sometimes the issue is you're working your ass off, never miss work, pass up on vacations and youre a quite valuable asset to the company but you have brown nosing, fast talking slackers being paid much more. Had the CEO not given anyone a raise, this whiny web developer would've been happier making $9k/year and more in the future less, just as long as others don't by god get a raise. Good ol' jealousy.

I think this CEO tried to change too much too fast and may or may not have properly taken merit and seniority into consideration. He certainly can't control jealousy and probably didn't take that into account. He's been flooded with applicants and probably will have no problem finding new talent.

I just assume everyone is operating on jealousy. And Democrats are Republicans are just two-sides of the jealousy coin. Democrats want to make everyone else equally poor and unaccomplished and Republicans want to make the majority poorer and a few higher class and wealthy.

Last edited by mtl1; 08-01-2015 at 06:17 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2015, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
That's just an assumption. Sometimes the issue is you're working your ass off, never miss work, pass up on vacations and youre a quite valuable asset to the company but you have brown nosing, fast talking slackers being paid much more. Had the CEO not given anyone a raise, this whiny web developer would've been happier making $9k/year and more in the future less, just as long as others don't by god get a raise. Good ol' jealousy.

I think this CEO tried to change too much too fast and may or may not have properly taken merit and seniority into consideration. He's been flooded with applicants and probably will have no problem finding new talent.
Who wouldn't want an entry level job paying $70K a year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2015, 06:21 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,881,487 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Who wouldn't want an entry level job paying $70K a year.

Well whether entry level or not I guess he'll be able to be very choosy and pick the best. Maybe from his competitors lol. Why isn't it socialism that other businesses are sore because he's paying a lot better than they do? All business have to pay the same bottom market wage?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2015, 06:22 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
Well whether entry level or not I guess he'll be able to be very choosy and pick the best. Maybe from his competitors lol. Why isn't it socialism that other businesses are sore because he's paying a lot better than they do? All business have to pay the same bottom market wage?
He's down to $3 million and has a lawsuit to deal with from his brother.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2015, 06:25 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,881,487 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
He's down to $3 million and has a lawsuit to deal with from his brother.
I guess we're a litigious society right. His brother is not the CEO and doesn't have a controlling interests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2015, 06:27 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 10,417,672 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
I guess we're a litigious society right. His brother is not the CEO and doesn't have a controlling interests.
Was his brother invested in the company? If so, the CEO had fiduciary responsiblity to investors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2015, 06:30 PM
 
1,136 posts, read 924,480 times
Reputation: 1642
Quote:
Originally Posted by VLWH View Post
Ideology was ok but execution was horrible. He should of gave moderate raises to all and larger raises to his best and brightest employees, you know the ones that kept the company profitable.
How do you know the ones leaving aren't the least productive. How do you know he isn't paying more to certain long time employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top