Should Army Traitor Bowe Bergdahl Go To Prison (suspect, terrorists, states)

[desertdetroiter]

Originally Posted by T-310

Uh what part of a legitimate government organization did they belong to?

So if you decide to fight without belonging to a "legitimate government organization," then you're a terrorist?

So that means that every rebel movement that the U.S. ever funded or supported was tantamount to abetting terrorism, right?

Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds

So now McVeigh is not a terrorist?

Should we call ISIS, Taliban, Hamas, etc.... victims of the world?

Irrelevant nonsense.

If the men we traded for Bergdahl were terrorists, prove it.

[desertdetroiter]

Originally Posted by Arjay51

Any evidence you would just ignore, so why bother.

As for your terrorist question, fighting the US from hiding when you are not being attacked, from hiding amid civilians and calling for the destructions of the US while demanding concessions is terrorism.

I don't expect you to admit that since apparently you support terrorism from your comments.

Lol...I knew you were gonna pull up lame.

You don't have any evidence. Just say so and move on instead of personally attacking me.

[wildflower82]

Originally Posted by desertdetroiter

So if you decide to fight without belonging to a "legitimate government organization," then you're a terrorist?

So that means that every rebel movement that the U.S. ever funded or supported was tantamount to abetting terrorism, right?


Irrelevant nonsense.

If the men we traded for Bergdahl were terrorists, prove it.

About as much as post #46.........

You are like Obama, you do the shuffle well, the both of you are so transparent.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by T-310

Uh what part of a legitimate government organization did they belong to?

The Taliban will be a part of Afghan government at some point, like it or not. I don't much care for their philosophy but they are a far cry from Al Queada and ISIS. They are fighting to get the US out of Afghanistan just as they did when the Russians were there, and they had our support.

They are not interested in sending terror to the US, just getting rid of us. There is no proof at this point that they did anything worth of 13 years of incarceration, at some point GITMO will be closed the sooner the better.

[Arjay51]

Originally Posted by desertdetroiter

So if you decide to fight without belonging to a "legitimate government organization," then you're a terrorist?

So that means that every rebel movement that the U.S. ever funded or supported was tantamount to abetting terrorism, right?


Irrelevant nonsense.

If the men we traded for Bergdahl were terrorists, prove it.

As are most of your posts.

And once again, why attempt to prove anything to you. You will only deny because it does not fit you narrative.

[wildflower82]

Originally Posted by Arjay51

As are most of your posts.

And once again, why attempt to prove anything to you. You will only deny because it does not fit you narrative.

Wondering why the poster is spending so much time sticking up for Muslim terrorists, traded for 1 US military deserter.

[T-310]

Originally Posted by desertdetroiter

So if you decide to fight without belonging to a "legitimate government organization," then you're a terrorist?

So that means that every rebel movement that the U.S. ever funded or supported was tantamount to abetting terrorism, right?


Irrelevant nonsense.

If the men we traded for Bergdahl were terrorists, prove it.

My definition of a terrorist is those Indiscrminitely kills people like the Taliban and idiots trying to kill their way to power in Syria and Iraq.

Your definition of a terrorist is whatever suits your talking points. All those idiots in Gitmo would be fish food if I were in charge.

[bluesjuke]

Originally Posted by Arjay51

As are most of your posts.

And once again, why attempt to prove anything to you. You will only deny because it does not fit you narrative.

Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds

Wondering why the poster is spending so much time sticking up for Muslim terrorists, traded for 1 US military deserter.

It's easier to argue than defend that it was right of Obama to make this sad/bad trade.

[desertdetroiter]

Originally Posted by T-310

My definition of a terrorist is those Indiscrminitely kills people like the Taliban and idiots trying to kill their way to power in Syria and Iraq.

Your definition of a terrorist is whatever suits your talking points. All those idiots in Gitmo would be fish food if I were in charge.

Who did the Taliban kill indiscriminately? Prove your assertion.

When the United States backed the non government mujihadeen forces in Afghanistan, were we abetting terrorism?

[desertdetroiter]

Originally Posted by bluesjuke

It's easier to argue than defend that it was right of Obama to make this sad/bad trade.

How was the trade a bad trade?

We're supposed to leave an American soldier in a foreign country? Since when is that permissible?

Bergdahl is not a deserter until he's convicted of being one. And even if he abandoned his post, he's STILL an American soldier until his ETS.

What precedent are you using to justify keeping Bergdahl in foreign captivity when he can be exchanged?

And again...prove that the five men that we traded were committing acts of terrorism against the United States.