Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I tend to agree: liberal tolerance seems to result in conservative nuts running wild. If conservatives are not ruled with an iron hand, they will rampage in the street in the name of 'freedom' or 'religion', killing all of those who do not share their own religious views or definition of freedom.
After all, in no sense of the word would these Islam terrorist be considered 'liberal'. They are very conservative. The nutcases who attacked the federal building in Oklahoma City certainly viewed themselves as 'conservative', wanted to destroy the government.
(Note: my post is mainly sarcastic; not completely, but mainly).
Location: Pittsburgh (via Chicago, via Pittsburgh)
3,887 posts, read 5,523,609 times
Reputation: 3107
Quote:
Originally Posted by LearnMe
Ignoring the idiot comments for a moment..., just what is the conservative answer to terrorism?
Perhaps we should pull another knee-jerk reaction and invade another country in the Middle East like Iraq? Have we not tried the American cowboy attempt at foreign policy for decades now. Are there still those who think terrorism began on 9/11?
I know better than to entertain the possibility that conservatives so inclined know much beyond how to vent anger and fear, lynch mob mentality style, that any one of them can articulate any sort of viable strategy to address the problems of the middle east -- centuries in the making!
But when the argument is made that liberals are the problem, I've really got to laugh!
Just like I do when I watch the GOP debates for POTUS.
Right, liberals are the problem. Hah!
Don't you see all the super smart conservatives on your facebook feed post stupid pictures of bombs and say "kill da iran and iraqies derr"...not realizing that perhaps the only country Isis hates more than the US is Iran. Also not realizing that bombing whole cities HASN'T BEEN WORKING IN THE PAST TEN YEARS...ISIS is proof of that. We have been attacking with drones throughout the Obama administration and it has only worked in ISIS's favor. We need special force coalitions from France, the UK, the US, Germany, hell, even Saudi special forces to go in and take out ISIS..not bomb towns and cities, create more civilian unrest and create more extremists. Knee-jerk reactions by conservatives are what ISIS THRIVES ON. They want mass retaliation. Small groups of select special forces? You know, sort of how we got Bin Laden? Thats a different story.
Ignoring the idiot comments for a moment..., just what is the conservative answer to terrorism?
Perhaps we should pull another knee-jerk reaction and invade another country in the Middle East like Iraq? Have we not tried the American cowboy attempt at foreign policy for decades now. Are there still those who think terrorism began on 9/11?
I know better than to entertain the possibility that conservatives so inclined know much beyond how to vent anger and fear, lynch mob mentality style, that any one of them can articulate any sort of viable strategy to address the problems of the middle east -- centuries in the making!
But when the argument is made that liberals are the problem, I've really got to laugh!
Just like I do when I watch the GOP debates for POTUS.
Right, liberals are the problem. Hah!
Take a look at Le Pen's platform. She seems to the be only one brave enough to voice it.
I agree with her on some issues. Instead of tracking these extremists for years just deport them.
History has shown us that governments were aware of these extremists and had been tracking them for years before they struck. That was even true with the Boston bomber boys.
Le Pen: ‘The French Are No Longer Safe’ - The New York Times
“Finally, fundamentalist Islam must be wiped out,” she said. “France must ban Islamist organizations, close radical mosques, and kick out foreigners who are preaching hatred on our soil, as well as illegal immigrants who have nothing to do here.”
I tend to agree: liberal tolerance seems to result in conservative nuts running wild. If conservatives are not ruled with an iron hand, they will rampage in the street in the name of 'freedom' or 'religion', killing all of those who do not share their own religious views or definition of freedom.
After all, in no sense of the word would these Islam terrorist be considered 'liberal'. They are very conservative. The nutcases who attacked the federal building in Oklahoma City certainly viewed themselves as 'conservative', wanted to destroy the government.
(Note: my post is mainly sarcastic; not completely, but mainly).
That Clinton-era wet job was witnessed in part by an office worker named Jane Graham. You can hear her relate what she saw, involving a crew who had federal passes as maintenance workers operating out of a beat up looking station wagon parked in the underground garage, and what to her looked like sticks of grey "putty," in the days leading up to the event, here:
Only two months before, then Sen. Biden had first attempted to introduce into Congress the legislation that 6 years later he revealed was his own bill.
Let's go bomb and invade some random countries with ground troops!! That is the obvious thing that we need to do.
Liberal diversionary idiocy.
When you cannot face the fact that liberal "tolerance" has delivered political, cultural, and economic dangers to western nations, you simply ignore the issue.
It is clear that the tenents of Islam are incompatible with western culture. In the US, in which there have been larger concentrations of Muslims, there has been rejection of US laws and values and failure to assimilate. No nation benefits from incompatible elements in its borders.
Further, the average liberal favors open borders and importing millions of unskilled, uneducated, often dangerous, illegals into the US. Such measures drive down wages, cost the US $100 billion per year, and increases crime in the US.
Wake up-
If you believe that importing Muslims and uneducated Mexicans into the US is a good idea, take one two INTO YOUR HOUSE and see how it works out. If not, why would you subject others to these same dangers, just to satisfy your weird sense of western guilt?
It is clear that the tenents of Islam are incompatible with western culture. In the US, in which there have been larger concentrations of Muslims, there has been rejection of US laws and values and failure to assimilate. No nation benefits from incompatible elements in its borders.
Islam is a bloody cancer, incompatible with every other religion in the world.
It has managed to get the Buddhists to become violent in Myanmar/Sri Lanka.
The same Buddhists whose show dissent by self-immolation (burning themselves) are fighting Islam.
Islam is a bloody cancer, incompatible with every other religion in the world.
It has managed to get the Buddhists to become violent in Myanmar/Sri Lanka.
The same Buddhists whose show dissent by self-immolation (burning themselves) are fighting Islam.
What exactly are Muslims doing in myanmar that has turned supposedly peaceful buddhists into murder machines?
This is yet another example that even a supposedly peaceful religion such as Buddhism has its crazy violent right-wingers.
Islam does not and never has believed in separation of church and state nor true democracy. Islam and the first amendment are incompatible. Islam and democracy are incompatible. Islam is the foreign enemy of the constitution. Muslim immigration makes Islam a domestic enemy of the constitution.
Also, racial advocacy groups like blackliesmatter is essentially the black version of the KKK and nazism. We should go after them and view them the same way we view the KKK .
What exactly are Muslims doing in myanmar that has turned supposedly peaceful buddhists into murder machines?
This is yet another example that even a supposedly peaceful religion such as Buddhism has its crazy violent right-wingers.
Multiculturalism leads to violence and conflict that even peaceful religious tenets can't suppress. Do you think the left and the secular doesn't resort to violence. Ever heard of communism? Only totalitarianism and force can somewhat tamp down the violent conflict multiculturalism creates.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.