Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ah, the same people who were handed intelligence by Russia to watch out for the boston bomber guy tell us they have a process for screening syrian refugees and there is no credible threat to the US.
Sleep well the obama administration is on the job.
And rest assured HRC will do her best to live up to the obama admins vigilance.
^^^^This.
However, I'm not worried about it at all.
ISIS would want to strike NYC, LA, Chicago and DC above most any other target in the US.
If you live in one of these cities, your odds of being affected are tiny. If you live elsewhere, you odds are pretty much non-existent.
I oppose accepting Syrian refugees because there isn't a good reason to bring them into the US.
Then told us ISIS was contained.... just to have it perpetrate the worst attack on Paris since WWII a matter of hours later.
Now they tell us "Syrian refugees" will go through an extensive screening process; problem is, you can't perform background checks when the info isn't there to begin with.
Anyone that wants to attack this country can do so anytime they want. Let's not pretend that it's hard. If a goofy ass kid can find a weapon and kill 20 small children in a school, a committed terrorist can have a field day at will. That's life in an open and free society.
If they haven't done it, you should safely assume that they just don't want to....yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78
Exactly, how many mass shootings have happened in the US this year alone?
ISIS would want to strike NYC, LA, Chicago and DC above most any other target in the US.
If you live in one of these cities, your odds of being affected are tiny. If you live elsewhere, you odds are pretty much non-existent.
I oppose accepting Syrian refugees because there isn't a good reason to bring them into the US.
Why do you think only those cities? Because of media presence? If so, why Chicago?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
