Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:17 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
So I guess no one knows how we determine where every single person around the world has traveled in the last 5 years?
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
We do, it is called a passport.
I don't know if it's still the case but I was in Morocco about 20 years ago and on entry, instead of stamping your passport they put a stamped piece of paper in your passport. The explanation I was given was that if I ever wanted to travel to Israel, not having a stamp from an Arabic country in my passport would be a good thing. I believe Cuba followed a similar policy with Americans who traveled there via Canada or Mexico.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,947,214 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by philkirkham View Post
Oh, now ya done it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:32 PM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,767,070 times
Reputation: 15667
I would support a bill like that. Nothing wrong and not against one group as it is people from all backgrounds that will not get a visa as they could have been there.

One person on CNN compared it with Ebola and closing the Country off to anyone who visited the areas where Ebola was threatening the population and the way this man explained it was very good and nothing to do with comparing islam to a disease as another person stated but comparing how to keep the Country safe.

Only sick people will make a sick comparison without seeing what really was meant to be compared.

No more PC but just being clear how to keep everyone safe.

The family of this murder couple stated they knew they were radicalized and they didn't report it and the mom lived in the household so she must be a radical muslim as well and that entire family sat there and did nothing so they are a bunch of sick people and the father already stated Israel will be off the map within 2 years so he should be out of this Country as he is sick in hi head too. that is hatred and b stating these things to his son he contributed to the radicalism, instead of saying son wise up and get rid of your sick thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,765,593 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Only been to Ireland where US citizens don't need a Visa.

I would have thought after 9/11 that the US would definitely require visas from any ME country or any country experiencing lots of terrorism.
The Visa Waiver Program was enacted in 1986 with the full support of the Chamber of Commerece lobby.

It was last expanded in 2008 with the addition of 7 countries.

No Middle Eastern country has ever participated in the program.

By design, the waiver can be terminated by either party, at any time.

Media reports the WH supports imposing restrictions.

How much other crap will be attached to this bill that could impact voting is anyone's guess?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:42 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Only been to Ireland where US citizens don't need a Visa.

I would have thought after 9/11 that the US would definitely require visas from any ME country or any country experiencing lots of terrorism.
The way I heard this proposal explained it's got nothing to do with letting people with ME passports into the US without a visa. It would affect those who can normally travel here without a visa IF they've been to Syria or Iraq in the last 5 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:46 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
I don't know if it's still the case but I was in Morocco about 20 years ago and on entry, instead of stamping your passport they put a stamped piece of paper in your passport. The explanation I was given was that if I ever wanted to travel to Israel, not having a stamp from an Arabic country in my passport would be a good thing. I believe Cuba followed a similar policy with Americans who traveled there via Canada or Mexico.
Yup, I remember that as well. Thing to remember is that you are tracked in a ton of ways. If your passport is missing the stamp, that doesn't mean that the US is unaware of where you have been.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
10,363 posts, read 7,995,858 times
Reputation: 27773
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
HOW can it be considered reasonable when it gives a pass to anyone who's been to Saudi Arabia, a known haven for Islamic terror, in the last 5 years?

Iraq and Syria bad?

Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Egypt, et al just fine and dandy?
That's just an argument for adding Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Egypt, Pakistan, etc. to the bill, not an argument against the idea itself. (Saudi might be tough, though, because of the hajj, which is going to generate a lot more legitimate traffic to that problematic country than most of the others get.)

Will it stop more terrorist attacks? Maybe, maybe not. (I don't expect it will make a huge difference, but it might make a small bit of difference.) But it doesn't infringe on anyone's rights, so at worst it's just ineffective, not ineffective AND unconstitutional (like so many of the other proposals currently floating around are).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
10,363 posts, read 7,995,858 times
Reputation: 27773
Quote:
Originally Posted by flashes1 View Post
This makes too much sense. No American needs to be going to the Middle East.
The bill has no effect on Americans' travel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
This will do more to prevent a terrorist attack than any gun control law.

Over 20 million come to the US with no travel visas each year and we let them stay for 90 days.
This bill will end that for anyone that's been to ME countries in the past 5 years.

And this bill has bipartisan support.

House set to tighten restrictions on visa-free travel to US
The House is poised to crack down on visa-free travel to the U.S., aiming to ensure that the Paris attacks won't be repeated here.
..
It is likely to pass by a wide, bipartisan margin.
Israelis won't be happy about this bill.


70 million tourists come to US annually, not 20 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,765,593 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post



The family of this murder couple stated they knew they were radicalized and they didn't report it and the mom lived in the household so she must be a radical muslim as well and that entire family sat there and did nothing so they are a bunch of sick people and the father already stated Israel will be off the map within 2 years so he should be out of this Country as he is sick in hi head too. that is hatred and b stating these things to his son he contributed to the radicalism, instead of saying son wise up and get rid of your sick thoughts.
Yesterday, the FBI disclosed this couple were both radicalized and Farooq had been so long before he sought a wife. They did not attribute this conclusion to the family and instead referred to hundreds of interviews. Farooq has a long history of gun ownership and target practice and his was joined him, post her arrival in the US.

This puts an end to speculation that his wife may have radicalized him. They seem to have been kindred spirits.

Farooq and his father did not have a relationship. Father is an alcoholic, wife beater and despises his ex wife.

Seems the FBI has their hands full sorting out this family and personal agendas.

I choose not to draw any premature conclusions given I have no knowledge of the interviews that have and will continue to be conducted by the FBI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top