Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2016, 03:49 PM
 
1,364 posts, read 1,116,673 times
Reputation: 1053

Advertisements

Here are some interesting numbers about the percentage of GDP that is spend for welfare. But I am not sure whether those numbers are comparable.

Net Total / Net Public / Private

Mexico: 7.7% / 7.5% / 0.2%
Norway: 19.3% / 18.1% / 1.2%
Finland: 23.4% / 22.6% / 0.8%
Sweden: 24.6% / 22.5% / 2.1%
Germany: 25.3% / 23.7% / 1.6%
Netherlands: 25.8% / 20.7% / 5.1%
Denmark: 26.1% / 23.4% / 2.7%
U.S.: 28.8% / 20.1% / 8.7%
France: 31.3% / 27.9% / 2.4%

Not sure how relevant or accurate those figures are. But they seem to be interesting. The U.S. seems to spend a higher amount of GDP for social issues than the "socialistic" Nordic countries. The question is whether the higher amount in the U.S. leads to better results than in the Nordic countries and of course whether those figures are correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:08 PM
 
1,364 posts, read 1,116,673 times
Reputation: 1053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lycanmaster View Post
I'm not sure if the actual citizens of those countries feel the same...

One Swedish woman I knew awhile back was studying here in the U.S. She wanted to return home to Sweden because she like her home country's economic policies better. They were "more socialist."

I don't think that a person from Europe would say "my country is more socialist". At least in Germany the word "socialism" is a curse word. Almost no one over here would describe Europe as "socialistic". It's more common to desribe it with the word "social democratic" or we say "it's more social than the U.S." Soziale Gerechtigkeit or "social justice" is very important in Germany. But it's not entirely clear what "social justice" means.

But it's true that many Europeans that have lived in the U.S. say one reason to turn home was, that the European home country is more social. But that doesn't mean that they don't like the U.S.

The sketchy welfare system in the U.S. seems to be one of the biggest issues that Europeans have in the U.S. But for some Europeans the U.S. has some advantages that compensate for the disadvantages in the welfare system. There is no perfect place on earth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:11 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,745,293 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Now step 2 is finding the corporate income tax revenues for the bay area.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
The corporate tax rate is the same in the Bay Area as the rest of California.
So you're saying you don't know the difference between rates and revenues
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,753,051 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
We do mention that, the problem is you guys want to keep the loopholes once you realize the actually amount these companies would pay goes up with no loopholes.
What loopholes are you talking about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,237,301 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motion View Post
I think too many Americans misunderstand Nordic countries like Denmark,Sweden and Norway. Yes these countries practice socialism to varying degrees(like the U.S) but it's an over simplification of these countries for Americans to view them as "Socialist countries".

Here's what some at the Cato Institute have said:

"Notwithstanding problems associated with a large welfare state, there is much to applaud in Nordic nations. They have open markets, low levels of regulation, strong property rights, stable currencies, and many other policies associated with growth and prosperity. Indeed, Nordic nations generally rank among the world’s most market-oriented nations.

Nordic nations also have implemented some pro-market reforms. Every Nordic nation has a lower corporate tax rate than the United States..."

None of which is BECAUSE of their Socialist tendencies. In fact, these are the decidedly NON-Socialist aspects of their systems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:19 PM
 
1,364 posts, read 1,116,673 times
Reputation: 1053
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Marginal corporate tax rate in Sweden: 22%

United States: 39.2%

Which is greater?

In my opinion the corporate tax in the U.S. is too high. That's a no brainer. Of course it should be lower to prevent that corporations relocate their HQ to countries like Ireland or to prevent that profits are "parked" in Caribbean tax havens. But it's very important that the distributed dividends are decent taxed with the income tax at the level of the dividend recipients. I don't know how dividends are taxed in the U.S.

It could be so simple. I don't understand why the left and right can't find pragmatic solutions. They are all caught in their ideologies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:29 PM
 
1,364 posts, read 1,116,673 times
Reputation: 1053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
None of which is BECAUSE of their Socialist tendencies. In fact, these are the decidedly NON-Socialist aspects of their systems.
That's the reason why the whole discussion capitalistic vs socialistic is absurd. I would describe the Scandinavian countries as very pragmatic countries with a focus on social issues. This description probably also fits to countries like the Netherlands or Germany and surely some other countries.
And a big advantage of those countries. Political parties in those countries are mostly able to find solutions, collectively. The mutual blockade in the U.S. between the right and the left is so disturbing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
4,903 posts, read 3,363,830 times
Reputation: 2977
Quote:
Originally Posted by lukas1973 View Post
I don't think that a person from Europe would say "my country is more socialist". At least in Germany the word "socialism" is a curse word. Almost no one over here would describe Europe as "socialistic". It's more common to desribe it with the word "social democratic" or we say "it's more social than the U.S." Soziale Gerechtigkeit or "social justice" is very important in Germany. But it's not entirely clear what "social justice" means.

But it's true that many Europeans that have lived in the U.S. say one reason to turn home was, that the European home country is more social. But that doesn't mean that they don't like the U.S.

The sketchy welfare system in the U.S. seems to be one of the biggest issues that Europeans have in the U.S. But for some Europeans the U.S. has some advantages that compensate for the disadvantages in the welfare system. There is no perfect place on earth.
Agreed that "social democratic" would be a better description, especially for North and Western Europe anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,821,814 times
Reputation: 11103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Yes, you do misunderstand.

GDP Comparisons:

Finland: $247,389,000
City of Atlanta: $294,589,000
The problem with this is that the US has a huge internal market, while Finland has a tiny internal market, which makes the comparison extremely unfair. Additionally Atlanta has lots of fortune 500 companies, for example one of the most famous brands on the planet: Coca Cola. Finland doesn't have those. These few big megacorporations boost the GDP massively. If Finland would have 300 million people, the largest domestic grocery chain would create enormous additional GDP. But alas, as we are only 5.5 million people, it's impossible. Or simply move the Coca Cola HQ to Helsinki from Atlanta, and we'll see about the GDP comparison then.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
No, they don't get free university education.

Only the cream of the crop gets to go to college for free.



It's called "job-sharing".

It was created by government to hide the continually constant high employment rates.
You're wrong. It's in our constitution that education is free and a fundamental right regardless on your financial situation. On top of that students get student subsidies, subsidised housing, subsisided meals at the student canteens (around €2.60 for a hot meal + salad) and free student healthcare. This makes economic mobility a lot more easier. Honestly, I think this constitution is a lot better than "the right to bear arms if the Queen of England attacks".

Job sharing is available only to a person who has a 20-year work history, and the maximum length is 180 days. Doesn't have any effect whatsoever. It's only a possibility if for example a father wants to spend a half year at home with his newborn kid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lycanmaster View Post
I'm not sure if the actual citizens of those countries feel the same...

One Swedish woman I knew awhile back was studying here in the U.S. She wanted to return home to Sweden because she like her home country's economic policies better. They were "more socialist."
I won't comment on which system is better, but people in the Nordic Countries are quite happy tax payers. We have a long tradition of equality, and people have realised that high taxes makes the society better for everyone. Here 1st graders walk to school alone. Maybe the ethos is socialist, or at least egalitarian, but we like it that way. We don't think taxation is theft but for the better good. But if you have a good idea and want to work your butt off, you're able to do that as well, and if you're smart you get wealthy.


edit: and I forgot to mention, Bernie Sanders is not a "democratic socialist", and neither very far left on the political spectrum at least on an European scale. This might be confusing in the US, but here in Europe "democratic socialism" is the far left, with strict governmental intervention and ownership. Sanders would be in Finland a social democrat, which as a party is totally committed to the free market ideology. Currently only Sweden has a social democratic government, with Denmark, Finland and Norway having centrist/centre-right governments. So maybe the Nordics are classified mostly as social liberal, with free markets somewhat regulated in some points, collective bargaining, moderate left socialist and centrist foreign policies, overall only slightly on the left side of the spectrum compared to the US.

Last edited by Ariete; 02-11-2016 at 11:54 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,177,123 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
The problem with this is that the US has a huge internal market, while Finland has a tiny internal market, which makes the comparison extremely unfair. Additionally Atlanta has lots of fortune 500 companies, for example one of the most famous brands on the planet: Coca Cola. Finland doesn't have those. These few big megacorporations boost the GDP massively. If Finland would have 300 million people, the largest domestic grocery chain would create enormous additional GDP. But alas, as we are only 5.5 million people, it's impossible. Or simply move the Coca Cola HQ to Helsinki from Atlanta, and we'll see about the GDP comparison then.
Thanks for proving my point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
You're wrong. It's in our constitution that education is free and a fundamental right regardless on your financial situation.
Education is free in the US, too.

I was talking about tertiary education, specifically university education.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
On top of that students get student subsidies, subsidised housing, subsisided meals at the student canteens (around €2.60 for a hot meal + salad) and free student healthcare.
And yet only 39% of the adult population held a "tertiary qualification" in 2011.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
Job sharing is ...
...a euphemism.

Call it whatever cute name you want, but the point is that many European States have shorter work weeks in order to force employers to hire more employees and reduce the perennially high unemployment rates.

Finland's unemployment rate is currently about 9.2%


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete View Post
We have a long tradition of equality,...
And what percent of the population are minorities?

Finland is ethnically homogeneous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top